Cargando…

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies

BACKGROUND: Prognostic models are typically developed to estimate the risk that an individual in a particular health state will develop a particular health outcome, to support (shared) decision making. Systematic reviews of prognostic model studies can help identify prognostic models that need to fu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Damen, Johanna A.A., Moons, Karel G.M., van Smeden, Maarten, Hooft, Lotty
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2023
Materias:	Review
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35934199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.019

Ejemplares similares

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bellou, Vanesa, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
por: Debray, Thomas PA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Damen, Johanna A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
por: Damen, Johanna A. A. G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Treatment use in prognostic model research: a systematic review of cardiovascular prognostic studies
por: Pajouheshnia, Romin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A generic nomogram for multinomial prediction models: theory and guidance for construction
por: van Smeden, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review
por: Hudda, Mohammed T., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria
por: van Smeden, Maarten, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Small-study effects and time trends in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, Wynanda Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols
por: van der Braak, Kim, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review
por: de Hond, Anne A. H., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
por: Ochodo, Eleanor A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

What did we learn in 35 years of research on nutrition and supplements for age‐related macular degeneration: a systematic review
por: Pameijer, Els M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies
por: Bax, Leon, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies
por: Naaktgeboren, Christiana A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
por: Wynants, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Developing and validating risk prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis
por: Ahmed, Ikhlaaq, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Nava, Chiara, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models
por: de Jong, Valentijn M. T., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Identification of Additional Trials in Prospective Trial Registers for Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: van Enst, Wynanda A., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

How to Conduct and Interpret Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
por: Singh, Siddharth
Publicado: (2017)

Performance of binary prediction models in high-correlation low-dimensional settings: a comparison of methods
por: Leeuwenberg, Artuur M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: van Weert, Julia C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care
por: Zwakman, Marieke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

From accuracy to patient outcome and cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests and biomarkers: an exemplary modelling study
por: Koffijberg, Hendrik, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_hsr90abqhuc4o7sk2rvgidnj5k