Cargando…

Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study

BACKGROUND: Various washout policies are widely used in adults living with long-term catheters (LTC). There is currently insufficient evidence on the benefits and potential harms of prophylactic LTC washout policies in the prevention of blockages and other LTC-related adverse events, such as urinary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdel-fattah, Mohamed, Johnson, Diana, Constable, Lynda, Thomas, Ruth, Cotton, Seonaidh, Tripathee, Sheela, Cooper, David, Boran, Sue, Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos, Evans, Suzanne, Granitsiotis, Paraskeve, Hashim, Hashim, Kilonzo, Mary, Larcombe, James, Little, Paul, MacLennan, Sara, Murchie, Peter, Myint, Phyo Kyaw, N’Dow, James, Norrie, John, Omar, Muhammad Imran, Paterson, Catherine, Scotland, Graham, Thiruchelvam, Nikesh, MacLennan, Graeme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06577-2
_version_ 1784762409084256256
author Abdel-fattah, Mohamed
Johnson, Diana
Constable, Lynda
Thomas, Ruth
Cotton, Seonaidh
Tripathee, Sheela
Cooper, David
Boran, Sue
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos
Evans, Suzanne
Granitsiotis, Paraskeve
Hashim, Hashim
Kilonzo, Mary
Larcombe, James
Little, Paul
MacLennan, Sara
Murchie, Peter
Myint, Phyo Kyaw
N’Dow, James
Norrie, John
Omar, Muhammad Imran
Paterson, Catherine
Scotland, Graham
Thiruchelvam, Nikesh
MacLennan, Graeme
author_facet Abdel-fattah, Mohamed
Johnson, Diana
Constable, Lynda
Thomas, Ruth
Cotton, Seonaidh
Tripathee, Sheela
Cooper, David
Boran, Sue
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos
Evans, Suzanne
Granitsiotis, Paraskeve
Hashim, Hashim
Kilonzo, Mary
Larcombe, James
Little, Paul
MacLennan, Sara
Murchie, Peter
Myint, Phyo Kyaw
N’Dow, James
Norrie, John
Omar, Muhammad Imran
Paterson, Catherine
Scotland, Graham
Thiruchelvam, Nikesh
MacLennan, Graeme
author_sort Abdel-fattah, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various washout policies are widely used in adults living with long-term catheters (LTC). There is currently insufficient evidence on the benefits and potential harms of prophylactic LTC washout policies in the prevention of blockages and other LTC-related adverse events, such as urinary tract infections. CATHETER II tests the hypothesis that weekly prophylactic LTC washouts (normal saline or citric acid) in addition to standard LTC care reduce the incidence of catheter blockage requiring intervention compared to standard LTC care only in adults living with LTC. METHODS: CATHETER II is a pragmatic three-arm open multi-centre superiority randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot, economic analysis, and embedded qualitative study. Eligible participants are adults aged ≥ 18 years, who have had a LTC in use for ≥ 28 days, have no plans to discontinue the use of the catheter, are able to undertake the catheter washouts, and complete trial documentation or have a carer able to help them. Participants are identified from general practitioner practices, secondary/tertiary care, community healthcare, care homes, and via public advertising strategies. Participants are randomised 1:1:1 to receive a weekly saline (0.9%) washout in addition to standard LTC care, a weekly citric acid (3.23%) washout in addition to standard LTC care or standard LTC care only. Participants and/or carers will receive training to administer the washouts. Patient-reported outcomes are collected at baseline and for 24 months post-randomisation. The primary clinical outcome is catheter blockage requiring intervention up to 24 months post-randomisation expressed per 1000 catheter days. Secondary outcomes include symptomatic catheter-associated urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics, catheter change, adverse events, NHS/ healthcare use, and impact on quality of life. DISCUSSION: This study will guide treatment decision-making and clinical practice guidelines regarding the effectiveness of various prophylactic catheter washout policies in men and women living with LTC. This research has received ethical approval from Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 (19/WA/0015). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN17116445. Registered prospectively on 06 November 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06577-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9351274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93512742022-08-05 Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study Abdel-fattah, Mohamed Johnson, Diana Constable, Lynda Thomas, Ruth Cotton, Seonaidh Tripathee, Sheela Cooper, David Boran, Sue Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos Evans, Suzanne Granitsiotis, Paraskeve Hashim, Hashim Kilonzo, Mary Larcombe, James Little, Paul MacLennan, Sara Murchie, Peter Myint, Phyo Kyaw N’Dow, James Norrie, John Omar, Muhammad Imran Paterson, Catherine Scotland, Graham Thiruchelvam, Nikesh MacLennan, Graeme Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Various washout policies are widely used in adults living with long-term catheters (LTC). There is currently insufficient evidence on the benefits and potential harms of prophylactic LTC washout policies in the prevention of blockages and other LTC-related adverse events, such as urinary tract infections. CATHETER II tests the hypothesis that weekly prophylactic LTC washouts (normal saline or citric acid) in addition to standard LTC care reduce the incidence of catheter blockage requiring intervention compared to standard LTC care only in adults living with LTC. METHODS: CATHETER II is a pragmatic three-arm open multi-centre superiority randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot, economic analysis, and embedded qualitative study. Eligible participants are adults aged ≥ 18 years, who have had a LTC in use for ≥ 28 days, have no plans to discontinue the use of the catheter, are able to undertake the catheter washouts, and complete trial documentation or have a carer able to help them. Participants are identified from general practitioner practices, secondary/tertiary care, community healthcare, care homes, and via public advertising strategies. Participants are randomised 1:1:1 to receive a weekly saline (0.9%) washout in addition to standard LTC care, a weekly citric acid (3.23%) washout in addition to standard LTC care or standard LTC care only. Participants and/or carers will receive training to administer the washouts. Patient-reported outcomes are collected at baseline and for 24 months post-randomisation. The primary clinical outcome is catheter blockage requiring intervention up to 24 months post-randomisation expressed per 1000 catheter days. Secondary outcomes include symptomatic catheter-associated urinary tract infection requiring antibiotics, catheter change, adverse events, NHS/ healthcare use, and impact on quality of life. DISCUSSION: This study will guide treatment decision-making and clinical practice guidelines regarding the effectiveness of various prophylactic catheter washout policies in men and women living with LTC. This research has received ethical approval from Wales Research Ethics Committee 6 (19/WA/0015). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN17116445. Registered prospectively on 06 November 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06577-2. BioMed Central 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9351274/ /pubmed/35927733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06577-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Abdel-fattah, Mohamed
Johnson, Diana
Constable, Lynda
Thomas, Ruth
Cotton, Seonaidh
Tripathee, Sheela
Cooper, David
Boran, Sue
Dimitropoulos, Konstantinos
Evans, Suzanne
Granitsiotis, Paraskeve
Hashim, Hashim
Kilonzo, Mary
Larcombe, James
Little, Paul
MacLennan, Sara
Murchie, Peter
Myint, Phyo Kyaw
N’Dow, James
Norrie, John
Omar, Muhammad Imran
Paterson, Catherine
Scotland, Graham
Thiruchelvam, Nikesh
MacLennan, Graeme
Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
title Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
title_full Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
title_short Randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the CATHETER II study
title_sort randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters: study protocol for the catheter ii study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06577-2
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelfattahmohamed randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT johnsondiana randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT constablelynda randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT thomasruth randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT cottonseonaidh randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT tripatheesheela randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT cooperdavid randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT boransue randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT dimitropouloskonstantinos randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT evanssuzanne randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT granitsiotisparaskeve randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT hashimhashim randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT kilonzomary randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT larcombejames randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT littlepaul randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT maclennansara randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT murchiepeter randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT myintphyokyaw randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT ndowjames randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT norriejohn randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT omarmuhammadimran randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT patersoncatherine randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT scotlandgraham randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT thiruchelvamnikesh randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy
AT maclennangraeme randomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofvariouswashoutpoliciesversusnowashoutpolicyinpreventingcatheterassociatedcomplicationsinadultslivingwithlongtermcathetersstudyprotocolforthecatheteriistudy