Cargando…

Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: Spin is a reporting practice in which study results are misrepresented by overestimating efficacy or underestimating harm. Prevalence of spin varies between clinical specialties, and estimates are based almost entirely on clinical trials. Little is known about spin in systematic reviews....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wise, Audrey, Mannem, Deepika, Arthur, Wade, Ottwell, Ryan, Greiner, Benjamin, Srouji, Derek, Wildes, Daniel, Hartwell, Micah, Wright, Drew N, Khojasteh, Jam, Vassar, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421
_version_ 1784762420574552064
author Wise, Audrey
Mannem, Deepika
Arthur, Wade
Ottwell, Ryan
Greiner, Benjamin
Srouji, Derek
Wildes, Daniel
Hartwell, Micah
Wright, Drew N
Khojasteh, Jam
Vassar, Matthew
author_facet Wise, Audrey
Mannem, Deepika
Arthur, Wade
Ottwell, Ryan
Greiner, Benjamin
Srouji, Derek
Wildes, Daniel
Hartwell, Micah
Wright, Drew N
Khojasteh, Jam
Vassar, Matthew
author_sort Wise, Audrey
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Spin is a reporting practice in which study results are misrepresented by overestimating efficacy or underestimating harm. Prevalence of spin varies between clinical specialties, and estimates are based almost entirely on clinical trials. Little is known about spin in systematic reviews. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis searching MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to antiplatelet therapies following acute coronary syndrome on 2 June 2020. Data were extracted evaluating the presence of spin and study characteristics, including methodological quality as rated by A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). All data extraction was conducted in a masked, duplicate manner from 2 June 2020 to 26 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Not applicable. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed abstracts of systematic reviews on antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and evaluated the prevalence of the nine most severe types of spin. We additionally explored associations between spin and certain study characteristics, including quality. RESULTS: Our searches returned 15 263 articles, and 185 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. Of these 185 reviews, 31.9% (59/185) contained some form of spin in the abstract. Seven forms of spin (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9) among the nine most severe were identified. No instances of types 6 or 8 were found. There were no statistically significant relationships between spin and the evaluated study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 appraisals. CONCLUSIONS: Spin was present in abstracts for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; subsequent studies are needed to identify correlations between spin and specific study characteristics. There were no statistically significant associations between spin and study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 ratings; however, implementing changes will ensure that spin is reduced in the field of cardiology as well as other fields of medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9351322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93513222022-08-19 Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study Wise, Audrey Mannem, Deepika Arthur, Wade Ottwell, Ryan Greiner, Benjamin Srouji, Derek Wildes, Daniel Hartwell, Micah Wright, Drew N Khojasteh, Jam Vassar, Matthew BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: Spin is a reporting practice in which study results are misrepresented by overestimating efficacy or underestimating harm. Prevalence of spin varies between clinical specialties, and estimates are based almost entirely on clinical trials. Little is known about spin in systematic reviews. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis searching MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to antiplatelet therapies following acute coronary syndrome on 2 June 2020. Data were extracted evaluating the presence of spin and study characteristics, including methodological quality as rated by A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). All data extraction was conducted in a masked, duplicate manner from 2 June 2020 to 26 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Not applicable. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed abstracts of systematic reviews on antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and evaluated the prevalence of the nine most severe types of spin. We additionally explored associations between spin and certain study characteristics, including quality. RESULTS: Our searches returned 15 263 articles, and 185 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. Of these 185 reviews, 31.9% (59/185) contained some form of spin in the abstract. Seven forms of spin (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9) among the nine most severe were identified. No instances of types 6 or 8 were found. There were no statistically significant relationships between spin and the evaluated study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 appraisals. CONCLUSIONS: Spin was present in abstracts for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; subsequent studies are needed to identify correlations between spin and specific study characteristics. There were no statistically significant associations between spin and study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 ratings; however, implementing changes will ensure that spin is reduced in the field of cardiology as well as other fields of medicine. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9351322/ /pubmed/35918107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Wise, Audrey
Mannem, Deepika
Arthur, Wade
Ottwell, Ryan
Greiner, Benjamin
Srouji, Derek
Wildes, Daniel
Hartwell, Micah
Wright, Drew N
Khojasteh, Jam
Vassar, Matthew
Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
title Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
title_full Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
title_short Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
title_sort spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421
work_keys_str_mv AT wiseaudrey spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT mannemdeepika spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT arthurwade spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT ottwellryan spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT greinerbenjamin spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT sroujiderek spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT wildesdaniel spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT hartwellmicah spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT wrightdrewn spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT khojastehjam spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy
AT vassarmatthew spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy