Cargando…
Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVES: Spin is a reporting practice in which study results are misrepresented by overestimating efficacy or underestimating harm. Prevalence of spin varies between clinical specialties, and estimates are based almost entirely on clinical trials. Little is known about spin in systematic reviews....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421 |
_version_ | 1784762420574552064 |
---|---|
author | Wise, Audrey Mannem, Deepika Arthur, Wade Ottwell, Ryan Greiner, Benjamin Srouji, Derek Wildes, Daniel Hartwell, Micah Wright, Drew N Khojasteh, Jam Vassar, Matthew |
author_facet | Wise, Audrey Mannem, Deepika Arthur, Wade Ottwell, Ryan Greiner, Benjamin Srouji, Derek Wildes, Daniel Hartwell, Micah Wright, Drew N Khojasteh, Jam Vassar, Matthew |
author_sort | Wise, Audrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Spin is a reporting practice in which study results are misrepresented by overestimating efficacy or underestimating harm. Prevalence of spin varies between clinical specialties, and estimates are based almost entirely on clinical trials. Little is known about spin in systematic reviews. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis searching MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to antiplatelet therapies following acute coronary syndrome on 2 June 2020. Data were extracted evaluating the presence of spin and study characteristics, including methodological quality as rated by A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). All data extraction was conducted in a masked, duplicate manner from 2 June 2020 to 26 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Not applicable. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed abstracts of systematic reviews on antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and evaluated the prevalence of the nine most severe types of spin. We additionally explored associations between spin and certain study characteristics, including quality. RESULTS: Our searches returned 15 263 articles, and 185 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. Of these 185 reviews, 31.9% (59/185) contained some form of spin in the abstract. Seven forms of spin (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9) among the nine most severe were identified. No instances of types 6 or 8 were found. There were no statistically significant relationships between spin and the evaluated study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 appraisals. CONCLUSIONS: Spin was present in abstracts for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; subsequent studies are needed to identify correlations between spin and specific study characteristics. There were no statistically significant associations between spin and study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 ratings; however, implementing changes will ensure that spin is reduced in the field of cardiology as well as other fields of medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9351322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93513222022-08-19 Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study Wise, Audrey Mannem, Deepika Arthur, Wade Ottwell, Ryan Greiner, Benjamin Srouji, Derek Wildes, Daniel Hartwell, Micah Wright, Drew N Khojasteh, Jam Vassar, Matthew BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: Spin is a reporting practice in which study results are misrepresented by overestimating efficacy or underestimating harm. Prevalence of spin varies between clinical specialties, and estimates are based almost entirely on clinical trials. Little is known about spin in systematic reviews. DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional analysis searching MEDLINE and Embase for systematic reviews and meta-analyses pertaining to antiplatelet therapies following acute coronary syndrome on 2 June 2020. Data were extracted evaluating the presence of spin and study characteristics, including methodological quality as rated by A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR-2). All data extraction was conducted in a masked, duplicate manner from 2 June 2020 to 26 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Not applicable. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed abstracts of systematic reviews on antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and evaluated the prevalence of the nine most severe types of spin. We additionally explored associations between spin and certain study characteristics, including quality. RESULTS: Our searches returned 15 263 articles, and 185 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. Of these 185 reviews, 31.9% (59/185) contained some form of spin in the abstract. Seven forms of spin (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9) among the nine most severe were identified. No instances of types 6 or 8 were found. There were no statistically significant relationships between spin and the evaluated study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 appraisals. CONCLUSIONS: Spin was present in abstracts for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; subsequent studies are needed to identify correlations between spin and specific study characteristics. There were no statistically significant associations between spin and study characteristics or AMSTAR-2 ratings; however, implementing changes will ensure that spin is reduced in the field of cardiology as well as other fields of medicine. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9351322/ /pubmed/35918107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Wise, Audrey Mannem, Deepika Arthur, Wade Ottwell, Ryan Greiner, Benjamin Srouji, Derek Wildes, Daniel Hartwell, Micah Wright, Drew N Khojasteh, Jam Vassar, Matthew Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study |
title | Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | spin within systematic review abstracts on antiplatelet therapies after acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35918107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiseaudrey spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT mannemdeepika spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT arthurwade spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT ottwellryan spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT greinerbenjamin spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT sroujiderek spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT wildesdaniel spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT hartwellmicah spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT wrightdrewn spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT khojastehjam spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy AT vassarmatthew spinwithinsystematicreviewabstractsonantiplatelettherapiesafteracutecoronarysyndromeacrosssectionalstudy |