Cargando…

Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND: Validation of biomarker‐based prognostic models to improve risk stratification in men with localized prostate cancer (PrCa) remains a clinical need. It has previously been shown that the cell cycle progression (CCP) test provides significant, independent prognostic information for men wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cuzick, Jack M., Stone, Steven, Lenz, Lauren, Flake, Darl D., Rajamani, Saradha, Moller, Henrik, Berney, Daniel Maurice, Cohen, Todd, Scardino, Peter T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1535
_version_ 1784762485889302528
author Cuzick, Jack M.
Stone, Steven
Lenz, Lauren
Flake, Darl D.
Rajamani, Saradha
Moller, Henrik
Berney, Daniel Maurice
Cohen, Todd
Scardino, Peter T.
author_facet Cuzick, Jack M.
Stone, Steven
Lenz, Lauren
Flake, Darl D.
Rajamani, Saradha
Moller, Henrik
Berney, Daniel Maurice
Cohen, Todd
Scardino, Peter T.
author_sort Cuzick, Jack M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Validation of biomarker‐based prognostic models to improve risk stratification in men with localized prostate cancer (PrCa) remains a clinical need. It has previously been shown that the cell cycle progression (CCP) test provides significant, independent prognostic information for men who were incidentally diagnosed with PrCa after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and were conservatively managed. AIM: The results have been extended in a newly analyzed retrospective cohort of UK men diagnosed through TURP biopsy (TURP1B; N = 305). METHODS AND RESULTS: The CCP score was derived from TURP biopsy tissue and combined with a modified UCSF Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score (CAPRA) to generate the clinical cell‐cycle risk score (CCR). The primary endpoint was PrCa‐specific mortality (PSM). Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for a one‐unit change in score. Median follow‐up was 9.6 (IQR: 5.4, 14.1) years, and 67 (22%) men died from PrCa within 10 years of diagnosis. The median CCP score was 1.1 (IQR: 0.6, 1.7). In univariate analyses, CCR proved a significant prognosticator of PSM (HR per unit score change = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.89, 2.74; P = 1.0 × 10(−19)). In multivariate analyses, CCR remained a significant prognosticator of PSM after adjusting for CAPRA (HR per unit score change = 4.36; 95% CI: 2.65, 7.16; P = 1.3 × 10(−8)), indicating that its molecular component, CCP, provides significant, independent prognostic information. CONCLUSION: These findings validate a combined clinicopathologic and molecular prognostic model for conservatively managed men who are diagnosed through TURP, supporting the use of CCR to inform clinical management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9351676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93516762022-08-09 Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy Cuzick, Jack M. Stone, Steven Lenz, Lauren Flake, Darl D. Rajamani, Saradha Moller, Henrik Berney, Daniel Maurice Cohen, Todd Scardino, Peter T. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Validation of biomarker‐based prognostic models to improve risk stratification in men with localized prostate cancer (PrCa) remains a clinical need. It has previously been shown that the cell cycle progression (CCP) test provides significant, independent prognostic information for men who were incidentally diagnosed with PrCa after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and were conservatively managed. AIM: The results have been extended in a newly analyzed retrospective cohort of UK men diagnosed through TURP biopsy (TURP1B; N = 305). METHODS AND RESULTS: The CCP score was derived from TURP biopsy tissue and combined with a modified UCSF Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score (CAPRA) to generate the clinical cell‐cycle risk score (CCR). The primary endpoint was PrCa‐specific mortality (PSM). Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for a one‐unit change in score. Median follow‐up was 9.6 (IQR: 5.4, 14.1) years, and 67 (22%) men died from PrCa within 10 years of diagnosis. The median CCP score was 1.1 (IQR: 0.6, 1.7). In univariate analyses, CCR proved a significant prognosticator of PSM (HR per unit score change = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.89, 2.74; P = 1.0 × 10(−19)). In multivariate analyses, CCR remained a significant prognosticator of PSM after adjusting for CAPRA (HR per unit score change = 4.36; 95% CI: 2.65, 7.16; P = 1.3 × 10(−8)), indicating that its molecular component, CCP, provides significant, independent prognostic information. CONCLUSION: These findings validate a combined clinicopathologic and molecular prognostic model for conservatively managed men who are diagnosed through TURP, supporting the use of CCR to inform clinical management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9351676/ /pubmed/34423592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1535 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cuzick, Jack M.
Stone, Steven
Lenz, Lauren
Flake, Darl D.
Rajamani, Saradha
Moller, Henrik
Berney, Daniel Maurice
Cohen, Todd
Scardino, Peter T.
Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy
title Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy
title_full Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy
title_fullStr Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy
title_short Validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy
title_sort validation of the cell cycle progression score to differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer in men diagnosed through transurethral resection of the prostate biopsy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34423592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1535
work_keys_str_mv AT cuzickjackm validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT stonesteven validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT lenzlauren validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT flakedarld validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT rajamanisaradha validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT mollerhenrik validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT berneydanielmaurice validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT cohentodd validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy
AT scardinopetert validationofthecellcycleprogressionscoretodifferentiateindolentfromaggressiveprostatecancerinmendiagnosedthroughtransurethralresectionoftheprostatebiopsy