Cargando…

Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening

The availability of fast validated screening for dementia is a critical clinical need to improve neurologic examination time efficiency. This study validated a 1-minute timed categorical recall (TCR) method, naming as many US cities as possible and compared TCR to the Folstein Minimental Status Exam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Charles R., Cargill, Michael P., Lee, Chansoon D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029518
_version_ 1784762518895329280
author Joseph, Charles R.
Cargill, Michael P.
Lee, Chansoon D.
author_facet Joseph, Charles R.
Cargill, Michael P.
Lee, Chansoon D.
author_sort Joseph, Charles R.
collection PubMed
description The availability of fast validated screening for dementia is a critical clinical need to improve neurologic examination time efficiency. This study validated a 1-minute timed categorical recall (TCR) method, naming as many US cities as possible and compared TCR to the Folstein Minimental Status Exam (MMSE) as a preliminary cognitive screening tool. Random uncompensated 349 volunteers were recruited ages 18 to 97 from local free clinics, retirement homes, university faculty, and students in Lynchburg, Virginia 2015 to 2020. Participants’ demographic and medical information were collected. After 1 minute preparation, participants were rapidly named as many US cities as possible until they were told to stop (1 minute). The time limitation was withheld in advance. Number of cities and organizational strategies were recorded. Folstein MMSE administration immediately after TCR was administered to 122 subjects recruited in the final 2 study years as a comparison benchmark. A multiple linear regression model and a regression tree model were used to identify important variables for the number of cities named and determine subgroups and their thresholds. TCR resulted in accuracy rate (0.80), sensitivity (0.78), and specificity (0.81). The global TCR threshold (9 cities named) is superseded by 4 subgroup thresholds, categorized by statistically important variables (age, education level, and number of states visited) as follows: For those visiting ≥8 states and 1. 18 to 71 ages with a master’s degree or above, the threshold was naming 20 cities; 2. 18 to 29 ages with a bachelor’s degree or below, the threshold was naming 17 cities; 3. 30 to 71 ages with a bachelor’s degree or below, the threshold was naming 10 cities. For those visiting <8 states or for ages 72 to 97 (regardless of education levels and number of states visited), the threshold was naming 8 cities. American cities are common knowledge across ages and backgrounds, making it a useful bedside screen for dementia. In clinical practice, patients who report fewer cities than the threshold of 9 cities should receive further cognitive testing. If the patient meets the criteria for a subgroup, then the higher subgroup thresholds apply. TCR is a more time-efficient preliminary dementia screening tool with improved sensitivity and similar specificity compared with MMSE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9351842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93518422022-08-05 Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening Joseph, Charles R. Cargill, Michael P. Lee, Chansoon D. Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The availability of fast validated screening for dementia is a critical clinical need to improve neurologic examination time efficiency. This study validated a 1-minute timed categorical recall (TCR) method, naming as many US cities as possible and compared TCR to the Folstein Minimental Status Exam (MMSE) as a preliminary cognitive screening tool. Random uncompensated 349 volunteers were recruited ages 18 to 97 from local free clinics, retirement homes, university faculty, and students in Lynchburg, Virginia 2015 to 2020. Participants’ demographic and medical information were collected. After 1 minute preparation, participants were rapidly named as many US cities as possible until they were told to stop (1 minute). The time limitation was withheld in advance. Number of cities and organizational strategies were recorded. Folstein MMSE administration immediately after TCR was administered to 122 subjects recruited in the final 2 study years as a comparison benchmark. A multiple linear regression model and a regression tree model were used to identify important variables for the number of cities named and determine subgroups and their thresholds. TCR resulted in accuracy rate (0.80), sensitivity (0.78), and specificity (0.81). The global TCR threshold (9 cities named) is superseded by 4 subgroup thresholds, categorized by statistically important variables (age, education level, and number of states visited) as follows: For those visiting ≥8 states and 1. 18 to 71 ages with a master’s degree or above, the threshold was naming 20 cities; 2. 18 to 29 ages with a bachelor’s degree or below, the threshold was naming 17 cities; 3. 30 to 71 ages with a bachelor’s degree or below, the threshold was naming 10 cities. For those visiting <8 states or for ages 72 to 97 (regardless of education levels and number of states visited), the threshold was naming 8 cities. American cities are common knowledge across ages and backgrounds, making it a useful bedside screen for dementia. In clinical practice, patients who report fewer cities than the threshold of 9 cities should receive further cognitive testing. If the patient meets the criteria for a subgroup, then the higher subgroup thresholds apply. TCR is a more time-efficient preliminary dementia screening tool with improved sensitivity and similar specificity compared with MMSE. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9351842/ /pubmed/35945729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029518 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Joseph, Charles R.
Cargill, Michael P.
Lee, Chansoon D.
Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening
title Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening
title_full Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening
title_fullStr Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening
title_short Utilizing timed categorical recall (naming US cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening
title_sort utilizing timed categorical recall (naming us cities) for rapid bedside dementia screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029518
work_keys_str_mv AT josephcharlesr utilizingtimedcategoricalrecallnaminguscitiesforrapidbedsidedementiascreening
AT cargillmichaelp utilizingtimedcategoricalrecallnaminguscitiesforrapidbedsidedementiascreening
AT leechansoond utilizingtimedcategoricalrecallnaminguscitiesforrapidbedsidedementiascreening