Cargando…
Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence
This study’s objective was to compare the total and outside the cleft prevalence of dental anomalies (DA) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and a control group. This retrospective cross-sectional study was done under a case–control design. The case group consisted of 192 non-syndromic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029383 |
_version_ | 1784762527485263872 |
---|---|
author | Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Huerta-García, Nieves Aime Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Lizarraga-Colomé, Eduardo Andrés Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel |
author_facet | Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Huerta-García, Nieves Aime Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Lizarraga-Colomé, Eduardo Andrés Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel |
author_sort | Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study’s objective was to compare the total and outside the cleft prevalence of dental anomalies (DA) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and a control group. This retrospective cross-sectional study was done under a case–control design. The case group consisted of 192 non-syndromic patients with complete CLP, while the control group included 411 patients. All subjects had orthopantomography, intra, and extraoral photographs. The prevalence of dental agenesis, supernumerary teeth, impacted teeth, dental transposition, and microdontia were compared using a chi-squared test (P < .05). Next, a second test was made, but only the anomalies outside the cleft were considered for this study. Total prevalence was 89.1% for cases, and 20.9% for controls (P < .01). The prevalence of each DA was significantly higher for the case group. In the analysis of DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence was still significantly associated (P < .01); however, only dental agenesis was statistically significant (P < .01). Further analysis found that a high rate of upper premolar absence (P < .01) could explain this event. Patients with CLP have a higher prevalence of DAs compared to controls. After considering only the DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence remains significantly higher. However, this phenomenon is explained mainly by the elevated prevalence of upper premolars’ agenesis. This study’s results suggest that environmental factors are behind the high prevalence of DAs in subjects with CLP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9351879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93518792022-08-05 Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Huerta-García, Nieves Aime Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Lizarraga-Colomé, Eduardo Andrés Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This study’s objective was to compare the total and outside the cleft prevalence of dental anomalies (DA) between patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and a control group. This retrospective cross-sectional study was done under a case–control design. The case group consisted of 192 non-syndromic patients with complete CLP, while the control group included 411 patients. All subjects had orthopantomography, intra, and extraoral photographs. The prevalence of dental agenesis, supernumerary teeth, impacted teeth, dental transposition, and microdontia were compared using a chi-squared test (P < .05). Next, a second test was made, but only the anomalies outside the cleft were considered for this study. Total prevalence was 89.1% for cases, and 20.9% for controls (P < .01). The prevalence of each DA was significantly higher for the case group. In the analysis of DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence was still significantly associated (P < .01); however, only dental agenesis was statistically significant (P < .01). Further analysis found that a high rate of upper premolar absence (P < .01) could explain this event. Patients with CLP have a higher prevalence of DAs compared to controls. After considering only the DAs outside the cleft, the total prevalence remains significantly higher. However, this phenomenon is explained mainly by the elevated prevalence of upper premolars’ agenesis. This study’s results suggest that environmental factors are behind the high prevalence of DAs in subjects with CLP. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9351879/ /pubmed/35945732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029383 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Herrera-Atoche, José Rubén Huerta-García, Nieves Aime Escoffié-Ramírez, Mauricio Aguilar-Pérez, Fernando Javier Aguilar-Ayala, Fernando Javier Lizarraga-Colomé, Eduardo Andrés Colomé-Ruiz, Gabriel Eduardo Zúñiga-Herrera, Iván Daniel Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence |
title | Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence |
title_full | Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence |
title_fullStr | Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence |
title_full_unstemmed | Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence |
title_short | Dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: A case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence |
title_sort | dental anomalies in cleft lip and palate: a case–control comparison of total and outside the cleft prevalence |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029383 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herreraatochejoseruben dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence AT huertagarcianievesaime dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence AT escoffieramirezmauricio dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence AT aguilarperezfernandojavier dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence AT aguilarayalafernandojavier dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence AT lizarragacolomeeduardoandres dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence AT colomeruizgabrieleduardo dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence AT zunigaherreraivandaniel dentalanomaliesincleftlipandpalateacasecontrolcomparisonoftotalandoutsidethecleftprevalence |