Cargando…
Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: We meta-analyzed available evidence on fertility, survival, and cancer recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029929 |
_version_ | 1784762541725974528 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yu-fei Fan, Yu Mu, Yi Zhang, Peng Wang, Meng-yao Li, Jin-ke |
author_facet | Zhang, Yu-fei Fan, Yu Mu, Yi Zhang, Peng Wang, Meng-yao Li, Jin-ke |
author_sort | Zhang, Yu-fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We meta-analyzed available evidence on fertility, survival, and cancer recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies reporting reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients with stage I EOC who underwent FSS. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled rates of disease outcomes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity in the data. RESULTS: We included 23 observational retrospective studies involving 1126 patients. The pooled pregnancy rate was 30% (95% CI, 0.26–0.34), while the pooled natural conception rate was 26% (95% CI, 0.20–0.33). The pooled live birth rate was 27% (95% CI, 0.22–0.32). The pooled rate of EOC recurrence was 12% (95% CI, 0.09–0.14), which did not differ significantly from the rate among patients who underwent radical surgery (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45–1.33). CONCLUSIONS: FSS is associated with good oncological outcomes but less than satisfactory reproductive outcomes. All in all, the procedure appears to be a safe alternative to radical surgery for EOC patients who want to preserve fertility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9351938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93519382022-08-05 Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Yu-fei Fan, Yu Mu, Yi Zhang, Peng Wang, Meng-yao Li, Jin-ke Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article OBJECTIVE: We meta-analyzed available evidence on fertility, survival, and cancer recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies reporting reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients with stage I EOC who underwent FSS. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled rates of disease outcomes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity in the data. RESULTS: We included 23 observational retrospective studies involving 1126 patients. The pooled pregnancy rate was 30% (95% CI, 0.26–0.34), while the pooled natural conception rate was 26% (95% CI, 0.20–0.33). The pooled live birth rate was 27% (95% CI, 0.22–0.32). The pooled rate of EOC recurrence was 12% (95% CI, 0.09–0.14), which did not differ significantly from the rate among patients who underwent radical surgery (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45–1.33). CONCLUSIONS: FSS is associated with good oncological outcomes but less than satisfactory reproductive outcomes. All in all, the procedure appears to be a safe alternative to radical surgery for EOC patients who want to preserve fertility. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9351938/ /pubmed/35945736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029929 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Yu-fei Fan, Yu Mu, Yi Zhang, Peng Wang, Meng-yao Li, Jin-ke Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage i epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029929 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyufei reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fanyu reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muyi reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangpeng reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangmengyao reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijinke reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |