Cargando…

Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: We meta-analyzed available evidence on fertility, survival, and cancer recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yu-fei, Fan, Yu, Mu, Yi, Zhang, Peng, Wang, Meng-yao, Li, Jin-ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029929
_version_ 1784762541725974528
author Zhang, Yu-fei
Fan, Yu
Mu, Yi
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Meng-yao
Li, Jin-ke
author_facet Zhang, Yu-fei
Fan, Yu
Mu, Yi
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Meng-yao
Li, Jin-ke
author_sort Zhang, Yu-fei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We meta-analyzed available evidence on fertility, survival, and cancer recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies reporting reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients with stage I EOC who underwent FSS. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled rates of disease outcomes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity in the data. RESULTS: We included 23 observational retrospective studies involving 1126 patients. The pooled pregnancy rate was 30% (95% CI, 0.26–0.34), while the pooled natural conception rate was 26% (95% CI, 0.20–0.33). The pooled live birth rate was 27% (95% CI, 0.22–0.32). The pooled rate of EOC recurrence was 12% (95% CI, 0.09–0.14), which did not differ significantly from the rate among patients who underwent radical surgery (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45–1.33). CONCLUSIONS: FSS is associated with good oncological outcomes but less than satisfactory reproductive outcomes. All in all, the procedure appears to be a safe alternative to radical surgery for EOC patients who want to preserve fertility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9351938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93519382022-08-05 Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Yu-fei Fan, Yu Mu, Yi Zhang, Peng Wang, Meng-yao Li, Jin-ke Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article OBJECTIVE: We meta-analyzed available evidence on fertility, survival, and cancer recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies reporting reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients with stage I EOC who underwent FSS. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled rates of disease outcomes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity in the data. RESULTS: We included 23 observational retrospective studies involving 1126 patients. The pooled pregnancy rate was 30% (95% CI, 0.26–0.34), while the pooled natural conception rate was 26% (95% CI, 0.20–0.33). The pooled live birth rate was 27% (95% CI, 0.22–0.32). The pooled rate of EOC recurrence was 12% (95% CI, 0.09–0.14), which did not differ significantly from the rate among patients who underwent radical surgery (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45–1.33). CONCLUSIONS: FSS is associated with good oncological outcomes but less than satisfactory reproductive outcomes. All in all, the procedure appears to be a safe alternative to radical surgery for EOC patients who want to preserve fertility. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9351938/ /pubmed/35945736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029929 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yu-fei
Fan, Yu
Mu, Yi
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Meng-yao
Li, Jin-ke
Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage i epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35945736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029929
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyufei reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fanyu reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT muyi reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangpeng reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangmengyao reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijinke reproductiveandoncologicaloutcomesoffertilitysparingsurgeryinpatientswithstageiepithelialovariancancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis