Cargando…

Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review

PURPOSE: This study systematically reviewed studies to determine the frequency and nature of medication administration errors in Latin American hospitals. SUMMARY: We systematically searched the medical literature of seven electronic databases to identify studies on medication administration errors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assunção-Costa, Lindemberg, Costa de Sousa, Ivellise, Alves de Oliveira, Maria Rafaela, Ribeiro Pinto, Charleston, Machado, Juliana Ferreira Fernandes, Valli, Cleidenete Gomes, de Souza, Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35925985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272123
_version_ 1784762565200445440
author Assunção-Costa, Lindemberg
Costa de Sousa, Ivellise
Alves de Oliveira, Maria Rafaela
Ribeiro Pinto, Charleston
Machado, Juliana Ferreira Fernandes
Valli, Cleidenete Gomes
de Souza, Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes
author_facet Assunção-Costa, Lindemberg
Costa de Sousa, Ivellise
Alves de Oliveira, Maria Rafaela
Ribeiro Pinto, Charleston
Machado, Juliana Ferreira Fernandes
Valli, Cleidenete Gomes
de Souza, Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes
author_sort Assunção-Costa, Lindemberg
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study systematically reviewed studies to determine the frequency and nature of medication administration errors in Latin American hospitals. SUMMARY: We systematically searched the medical literature of seven electronic databases to identify studies on medication administration errors in Latin American hospitals using the direct observation method. Studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese between 1946 and March 2021 were included. A total of 10 studies conducted at 22 hospitals were included in the review. Nursing professionals were the most frequently observed during medication administration and were observers in four of the ten included studies. Total number of error opportunities was used as a parameter to calculate error rates. The administration error rate had a median of 32% (interquartile range 16%–35.8%) with high variability in the described frequencies (9%–64%). Excluding time errors, the median error rate was 9.7% (interquartile range 7.4%–29.5%). Four different definitions of medication errors were used in these studies. The most frequently observed errors were time, dose, and omission. Only four studies described the therapeutic classes or groups involved in the errors, with systemic anti-infectives being the most reported. None of the studies assessed the severity or outcome of the errors. The assessment of the overall risk bias revealed that one study had low risk, three had moderate risk, and three had high risk. In the assessment of the exploratory, observational, and before-after studies, two were classified as having fair quality and one as having poor quality. CONCLUSION: The administration error rate in Latin America was high, even when time errors were excluded. The variation observed in the frequencies can be explained by the different contexts in which the study was conducted. Future research using direct observation techniques is necessary to more accurately estimate the nature and severity of medication administration errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9352042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93520422022-08-05 Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review Assunção-Costa, Lindemberg Costa de Sousa, Ivellise Alves de Oliveira, Maria Rafaela Ribeiro Pinto, Charleston Machado, Juliana Ferreira Fernandes Valli, Cleidenete Gomes de Souza, Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: This study systematically reviewed studies to determine the frequency and nature of medication administration errors in Latin American hospitals. SUMMARY: We systematically searched the medical literature of seven electronic databases to identify studies on medication administration errors in Latin American hospitals using the direct observation method. Studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese between 1946 and March 2021 were included. A total of 10 studies conducted at 22 hospitals were included in the review. Nursing professionals were the most frequently observed during medication administration and were observers in four of the ten included studies. Total number of error opportunities was used as a parameter to calculate error rates. The administration error rate had a median of 32% (interquartile range 16%–35.8%) with high variability in the described frequencies (9%–64%). Excluding time errors, the median error rate was 9.7% (interquartile range 7.4%–29.5%). Four different definitions of medication errors were used in these studies. The most frequently observed errors were time, dose, and omission. Only four studies described the therapeutic classes or groups involved in the errors, with systemic anti-infectives being the most reported. None of the studies assessed the severity or outcome of the errors. The assessment of the overall risk bias revealed that one study had low risk, three had moderate risk, and three had high risk. In the assessment of the exploratory, observational, and before-after studies, two were classified as having fair quality and one as having poor quality. CONCLUSION: The administration error rate in Latin America was high, even when time errors were excluded. The variation observed in the frequencies can be explained by the different contexts in which the study was conducted. Future research using direct observation techniques is necessary to more accurately estimate the nature and severity of medication administration errors. Public Library of Science 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9352042/ /pubmed/35925985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272123 Text en © 2022 Assunção-Costa et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Assunção-Costa, Lindemberg
Costa de Sousa, Ivellise
Alves de Oliveira, Maria Rafaela
Ribeiro Pinto, Charleston
Machado, Juliana Ferreira Fernandes
Valli, Cleidenete Gomes
de Souza, Luís Eugênio Portela Fernandes
Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review
title Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review
title_full Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review
title_fullStr Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review
title_short Drug administration errors in Latin America: A systematic review
title_sort drug administration errors in latin america: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35925985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272123
work_keys_str_mv AT assuncaocostalindemberg drugadministrationerrorsinlatinamericaasystematicreview
AT costadesousaivellise drugadministrationerrorsinlatinamericaasystematicreview
AT alvesdeoliveiramariarafaela drugadministrationerrorsinlatinamericaasystematicreview
AT ribeiropintocharleston drugadministrationerrorsinlatinamericaasystematicreview
AT machadojulianaferreirafernandes drugadministrationerrorsinlatinamericaasystematicreview
AT vallicleidenetegomes drugadministrationerrorsinlatinamericaasystematicreview
AT desouzaluiseugenioportelafernandes drugadministrationerrorsinlatinamericaasystematicreview