Cargando…

Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine

Dietary bacteriophages potentially can serve as a step to reduce Salmonella contamination of feed through direct lysis of the bacteria. However, poultry producers commonly vaccinate with live Salmonella vaccines, which could potentially be lysed by dietary bacteriophages. The objective of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimminau, E.A., Karnezos, T.P., Russo, K.N., Baxter, J.A., Berghaus, R.D., Jones, M., Hofacre, C.L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102001
_version_ 1784762650032340992
author Kimminau, E.A.
Karnezos, T.P.
Russo, K.N.
Baxter, J.A.
Berghaus, R.D.
Jones, M.
Hofacre, C.L.
author_facet Kimminau, E.A.
Karnezos, T.P.
Russo, K.N.
Baxter, J.A.
Berghaus, R.D.
Jones, M.
Hofacre, C.L.
author_sort Kimminau, E.A.
collection PubMed
description Dietary bacteriophages potentially can serve as a step to reduce Salmonella contamination of feed through direct lysis of the bacteria. However, poultry producers commonly vaccinate with live Salmonella vaccines, which could potentially be lysed by dietary bacteriophages. The objective of this study was to evaluate if dietary bacteriophages impacted the colonization of a live Salmonella vaccine. A total of 210 day-of-hatch Ross male broiler chicks were divided into 3 treatments consisting of 2 replicate per treatment. Each replicate contained 35 birds. T1 was the challenge control, given no Salmonella vaccine, T2 was challenged and given Salmonella vaccine and T3 was challenged, given Salmonella vaccine as well as dietary bacteriophage. Salmonella vaccine was administered day of hatch. On d 3, four birds/pen were sampled for Salmonella vaccine colonization of ceca and liver/spleen. The remaining birds were challenged with 5 × 10(7) CFU of nalidixic acid- resistant Salmonella enteritidis (S.E.). On d 28, ten birds/replicate were sampled via cloaca swabs to culture for S.E. On d 42, the trial was terminated, birds were weighed, and performance was calculated. In addition, 15 birds/replicate were sampled for cecal cultures of S.E. On d 3, T1 had 0% vaccine strain isolated, and significantly lower (P = 0.009) cecal prevalence compared with T2 (75%) and T3 (38%) being intermediate. T1 (0%) had significantly lower liver/spleen vaccine strain prevalence (P = 0.002) compared with T3 (88%) and T2 (63%) being intermediate. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed among treatments in Salmonella prevalence in d 28 cloacal swabs. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in d 42 cecal Salmonella prevalence between all treatments. No significant differences in bird weight were observed between treatments d 0 to 42 (P > 0.05). However, T2 and T3 had lower mortality and adjusted feed conversion ratio (FCR; P < 0.05) compared with T1. Therefore, the dietary bacteriophage did not interfere with colonization or protection afforded by the live Salmonella vaccine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9352454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93524542022-08-05 Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine Kimminau, E.A. Karnezos, T.P. Russo, K.N. Baxter, J.A. Berghaus, R.D. Jones, M. Hofacre, C.L. Poult Sci MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY Dietary bacteriophages potentially can serve as a step to reduce Salmonella contamination of feed through direct lysis of the bacteria. However, poultry producers commonly vaccinate with live Salmonella vaccines, which could potentially be lysed by dietary bacteriophages. The objective of this study was to evaluate if dietary bacteriophages impacted the colonization of a live Salmonella vaccine. A total of 210 day-of-hatch Ross male broiler chicks were divided into 3 treatments consisting of 2 replicate per treatment. Each replicate contained 35 birds. T1 was the challenge control, given no Salmonella vaccine, T2 was challenged and given Salmonella vaccine and T3 was challenged, given Salmonella vaccine as well as dietary bacteriophage. Salmonella vaccine was administered day of hatch. On d 3, four birds/pen were sampled for Salmonella vaccine colonization of ceca and liver/spleen. The remaining birds were challenged with 5 × 10(7) CFU of nalidixic acid- resistant Salmonella enteritidis (S.E.). On d 28, ten birds/replicate were sampled via cloaca swabs to culture for S.E. On d 42, the trial was terminated, birds were weighed, and performance was calculated. In addition, 15 birds/replicate were sampled for cecal cultures of S.E. On d 3, T1 had 0% vaccine strain isolated, and significantly lower (P = 0.009) cecal prevalence compared with T2 (75%) and T3 (38%) being intermediate. T1 (0%) had significantly lower liver/spleen vaccine strain prevalence (P = 0.002) compared with T3 (88%) and T2 (63%) being intermediate. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed among treatments in Salmonella prevalence in d 28 cloacal swabs. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in d 42 cecal Salmonella prevalence between all treatments. No significant differences in bird weight were observed between treatments d 0 to 42 (P > 0.05). However, T2 and T3 had lower mortality and adjusted feed conversion ratio (FCR; P < 0.05) compared with T1. Therefore, the dietary bacteriophage did not interfere with colonization or protection afforded by the live Salmonella vaccine. Elsevier 2022-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9352454/ /pubmed/35908492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102001 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY
Kimminau, E.A.
Karnezos, T.P.
Russo, K.N.
Baxter, J.A.
Berghaus, R.D.
Jones, M.
Hofacre, C.L.
Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine
title Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine
title_full Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine
title_fullStr Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine
title_short Research Note: In-feed Bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live Salmonella vaccine
title_sort research note: in-feed bacteriophage does not impact efficacy of live salmonella vaccine
topic MICROBIOLOGY AND FOOD SAFETY
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35908492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102001
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminauea researchnoteinfeedbacteriophagedoesnotimpactefficacyoflivesalmonellavaccine
AT karnezostp researchnoteinfeedbacteriophagedoesnotimpactefficacyoflivesalmonellavaccine
AT russokn researchnoteinfeedbacteriophagedoesnotimpactefficacyoflivesalmonellavaccine
AT baxterja researchnoteinfeedbacteriophagedoesnotimpactefficacyoflivesalmonellavaccine
AT berghausrd researchnoteinfeedbacteriophagedoesnotimpactefficacyoflivesalmonellavaccine
AT jonesm researchnoteinfeedbacteriophagedoesnotimpactefficacyoflivesalmonellavaccine
AT hofacrecl researchnoteinfeedbacteriophagedoesnotimpactefficacyoflivesalmonellavaccine