Cargando…

Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid

The angle and position of the scapular glenoid are important in shoulder mechanics, the interpretation of diseases, and planning shoulder replacement surgery. In total shoulder replacement, understanding the bony parameters of the glenoid is also of considerable guiding significance for designing im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Jing, Zhong, Bin, Qu, Rongmei, Qian, Lei, Li, Zeyu, Liu, Chang, Xiao, Zhaoming, Xu, Guangwei, Liang, Haibin, Wei, Kuanhai, Ouyang, Jun, Dai, Jingxing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17783-y
_version_ 1784762723707387904
author Zhou, Jing
Zhong, Bin
Qu, Rongmei
Qian, Lei
Li, Zeyu
Liu, Chang
Xiao, Zhaoming
Xu, Guangwei
Liang, Haibin
Wei, Kuanhai
Ouyang, Jun
Dai, Jingxing
author_facet Zhou, Jing
Zhong, Bin
Qu, Rongmei
Qian, Lei
Li, Zeyu
Liu, Chang
Xiao, Zhaoming
Xu, Guangwei
Liang, Haibin
Wei, Kuanhai
Ouyang, Jun
Dai, Jingxing
author_sort Zhou, Jing
collection PubMed
description The angle and position of the scapular glenoid are important in shoulder mechanics, the interpretation of diseases, and planning shoulder replacement surgery. In total shoulder replacement, understanding the bony parameters of the glenoid is also of considerable guiding significance for designing implant size and improving material adaptability. To compare glenoid parameters measured from skeletal scapula specimens with those measured by 3D modeling of CT scanning images, analyze correlations between these data, and draw conclusions to guide clinical treatment of shoulder joint injury and total shoulder joint replacement. The data of manual and CT measurements from the same Chinese dry glenoid was compared. Three-dimensional measurement data were collected from the Japanese population and compared with the Chinese population data generated in this study. There were no significant differences between manual measurement and CT measurement in the inclination angle, glenopolar angle, anteroposterior transverse diameter, upper to lower vertical diameter, and depth of the glenoid (P = 0.288, 0.524, 0.111, 0.194, and 0.055, respectively). Further, there were no significant differences between Japanese and Chinese glenoid bones in the upper and lower vertical diameters or anteroposterior transverse diameters (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between CT and manual measurements, suggesting that the CT method may provide measurements very close to the actual specimen size. This result, however, indicated that the measurer should be careful when measuring the depth of the glenoid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9352768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93527682022-08-06 Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid Zhou, Jing Zhong, Bin Qu, Rongmei Qian, Lei Li, Zeyu Liu, Chang Xiao, Zhaoming Xu, Guangwei Liang, Haibin Wei, Kuanhai Ouyang, Jun Dai, Jingxing Sci Rep Article The angle and position of the scapular glenoid are important in shoulder mechanics, the interpretation of diseases, and planning shoulder replacement surgery. In total shoulder replacement, understanding the bony parameters of the glenoid is also of considerable guiding significance for designing implant size and improving material adaptability. To compare glenoid parameters measured from skeletal scapula specimens with those measured by 3D modeling of CT scanning images, analyze correlations between these data, and draw conclusions to guide clinical treatment of shoulder joint injury and total shoulder joint replacement. The data of manual and CT measurements from the same Chinese dry glenoid was compared. Three-dimensional measurement data were collected from the Japanese population and compared with the Chinese population data generated in this study. There were no significant differences between manual measurement and CT measurement in the inclination angle, glenopolar angle, anteroposterior transverse diameter, upper to lower vertical diameter, and depth of the glenoid (P = 0.288, 0.524, 0.111, 0.194, and 0.055, respectively). Further, there were no significant differences between Japanese and Chinese glenoid bones in the upper and lower vertical diameters or anteroposterior transverse diameters (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences between CT and manual measurements, suggesting that the CT method may provide measurements very close to the actual specimen size. This result, however, indicated that the measurer should be careful when measuring the depth of the glenoid. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9352768/ /pubmed/35927571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17783-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhou, Jing
Zhong, Bin
Qu, Rongmei
Qian, Lei
Li, Zeyu
Liu, Chang
Xiao, Zhaoming
Xu, Guangwei
Liang, Haibin
Wei, Kuanhai
Ouyang, Jun
Dai, Jingxing
Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid
title Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid
title_full Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid
title_fullStr Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid
title_full_unstemmed Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid
title_short Anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid
title_sort anatomic measurement of osseous parameters of the glenoid
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17783-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujing anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT zhongbin anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT qurongmei anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT qianlei anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT lizeyu anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT liuchang anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT xiaozhaoming anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT xuguangwei anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT lianghaibin anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT weikuanhai anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT ouyangjun anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid
AT daijingxing anatomicmeasurementofosseousparametersoftheglenoid