Cargando…

Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the use of and evidence for eConsult in correctional facilities worldwide. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Three academic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL) were searched to identify papers published between 1990 and 2020 that presented data on eConsult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sethuram, Claire, Helmer-Smith, Mary, Karunananthan, Sathya, Keely, Erin, Singh, Jatinderpreet, Liddy, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055049
_version_ 1784762775604559872
author Sethuram, Claire
Helmer-Smith, Mary
Karunananthan, Sathya
Keely, Erin
Singh, Jatinderpreet
Liddy, Clare
author_facet Sethuram, Claire
Helmer-Smith, Mary
Karunananthan, Sathya
Keely, Erin
Singh, Jatinderpreet
Liddy, Clare
author_sort Sethuram, Claire
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the use of and evidence for eConsult in correctional facilities worldwide. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Three academic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL) were searched to identify papers published between 1990 and 2020 that presented data on eConsult use in correctional facilities. The grey literature was also searched for any resources that discussed eConsult use in correctional facilities. Articles and resources were excluded if they discussed synchronous, patient-to-provider or unsecure communication. The reference lists of included articles were also hand searched. RESULTS: Of the 226 records retrieved from the academic literature search and 595 from the grey literature search, 22 were included in the review. Most study populations included adult male offenders in a variety of correctional environments. These resources identified 13 unique eConsult services in six countries. Six of these services involved multiple medical specialties, while the remaining services were single specialty. The available evidence was organised into five identified themes: feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to care, provider satisfaction and clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified evidence that the use of eConsult in correctional facilities is beneficial and avoids unnecessary transportation of offenders outside of the facilities. It is feasible, cost-effective, increases access to care, has an impact on clinical care and has high provider satisfaction. Some gaps in the literature remain, and we suggest further research on patient satisfaction, enablers and barriers to implementation, and women, youth and transgender populations in this setting to inform service providers and stakeholders. Despite some gaps, eConsult is evidently an important tool to provide timely, high-quality care to offenders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9352998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93529982022-08-19 Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review Sethuram, Claire Helmer-Smith, Mary Karunananthan, Sathya Keely, Erin Singh, Jatinderpreet Liddy, Clare BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the use of and evidence for eConsult in correctional facilities worldwide. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: Three academic databases (MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL) were searched to identify papers published between 1990 and 2020 that presented data on eConsult use in correctional facilities. The grey literature was also searched for any resources that discussed eConsult use in correctional facilities. Articles and resources were excluded if they discussed synchronous, patient-to-provider or unsecure communication. The reference lists of included articles were also hand searched. RESULTS: Of the 226 records retrieved from the academic literature search and 595 from the grey literature search, 22 were included in the review. Most study populations included adult male offenders in a variety of correctional environments. These resources identified 13 unique eConsult services in six countries. Six of these services involved multiple medical specialties, while the remaining services were single specialty. The available evidence was organised into five identified themes: feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to care, provider satisfaction and clinical impact. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified evidence that the use of eConsult in correctional facilities is beneficial and avoids unnecessary transportation of offenders outside of the facilities. It is feasible, cost-effective, increases access to care, has an impact on clinical care and has high provider satisfaction. Some gaps in the literature remain, and we suggest further research on patient satisfaction, enablers and barriers to implementation, and women, youth and transgender populations in this setting to inform service providers and stakeholders. Despite some gaps, eConsult is evidently an important tool to provide timely, high-quality care to offenders. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9352998/ /pubmed/35922103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055049 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Sethuram, Claire
Helmer-Smith, Mary
Karunananthan, Sathya
Keely, Erin
Singh, Jatinderpreet
Liddy, Clare
Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review
title Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review
title_full Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review
title_fullStr Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review
title_short Electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review
title_sort electronic consultation in correctional facilities worldwide: a scoping review
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9352998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35922103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055049
work_keys_str_mv AT sethuramclaire electronicconsultationincorrectionalfacilitiesworldwideascopingreview
AT helmersmithmary electronicconsultationincorrectionalfacilitiesworldwideascopingreview
AT karunananthansathya electronicconsultationincorrectionalfacilitiesworldwideascopingreview
AT keelyerin electronicconsultationincorrectionalfacilitiesworldwideascopingreview
AT singhjatinderpreet electronicconsultationincorrectionalfacilitiesworldwideascopingreview
AT liddyclare electronicconsultationincorrectionalfacilitiesworldwideascopingreview