Cargando…

Lessons learned from the perinatal audit of uterine rupture in the Netherlands: A mixed‐method study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To analyze outcomes of nationwide local audits of uterine rupture to draw lessons for clinical care. METHODS: Descriptive cohort study. Critical incident audit sessions within all local perinatal cooperation groups in the Netherlands. Women who sustained uterine rupture between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosman, Ageeth N., van Dillen, Jeroen, Zwart, Joost, Overtoom, Evelien, Schaap, Timme, Bloemenkamp, Kitty, van den Akker, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.664
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To analyze outcomes of nationwide local audits of uterine rupture to draw lessons for clinical care. METHODS: Descriptive cohort study. Critical incident audit sessions within all local perinatal cooperation groups in the Netherlands. Women who sustained uterine rupture between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvable factors, recommendations, and lessons learned for clinical care. Women's case histories were discussed in multidisciplinary perinatal audit sessions. Participants evaluated care against national and local clinical guidelines and common professional standards to identify improvable factors. Cases and outcomes were registered in a nationwide database. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen women who sustained uterine rupture were discussed in local perinatal audit sessions by 40–60 participants on average: A total of 111 (97%) were multiparous of whom 107 (94%) had given birth by cesarean section in a previous pregnancy. The audit revealed 178 improvable factors and 200 recommendations. Six percent (N = 11) of the improvable factors were identified as very likely and 18% (N = 32) as likely to have a relationship with the outcome or occurrence of uterine rupture. Improvable factors were related to inadequate communication, absent, or unclear documentation, delay in diagnosing the rupture, and suboptimal management of labor. Speak up in case a suspicion arises, escalating care by involving specialist obstetricians, addressing the importance of accurate documentation, and improving training related to fetal monitoring were the most frequent recommendations and should be topics for team (skills and drills) training. CONCLUSIONS: Through a nationwide incident audit of uterine rupture, we identified improvable factors related to communication, documentation, and organization of care. Lessons learned include “speaking up,” improving the transfer of information and team training are crucial to reduce the incidence of uterine rupture.