Cargando…
Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement
BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, a significant proportion of patients might recover AV conduction at follow-up. OBJECTIVES: The aim of ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.904828 |
_version_ | 1784762889193652224 |
---|---|
author | Pelargonio, Gemma Scacciavillani, Roberto Donisi, Luca Narducci, Maria Lucia Aurigemma, Cristina Pinnacchio, Gaetano Bencardino, Gianluigi Perna, Francesco Spera, Francesco Raffaele Comerci, Gianluca Ruscio, Eleonora Romagnoli, Enrico Crea, Filippo Burzotta, Francesco Trani, Carlo |
author_facet | Pelargonio, Gemma Scacciavillani, Roberto Donisi, Luca Narducci, Maria Lucia Aurigemma, Cristina Pinnacchio, Gaetano Bencardino, Gianluigi Perna, Francesco Spera, Francesco Raffaele Comerci, Gianluca Ruscio, Eleonora Romagnoli, Enrico Crea, Filippo Burzotta, Francesco Trani, Carlo |
author_sort | Pelargonio, Gemma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, a significant proportion of patients might recover AV conduction at follow-up. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the recovery of AV conduction by determination through Wenckebach point in patients with PPI and therefore identify patients who could benefit from device reprogramming to avoid unnecessary RV pacing. METHODS: We enrolled 43 patients that underwent PM implantation after TAVI at our Department from January 2018 to January 2021. PM interrogation was performed at follow-up and patients with native spontaneous rhythm were further assessed for AV conduction through WP determination. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients requiring a PM represented the final study population, divided in patients with severely impaired AV conduction (no spontaneous valid rhythm or WP < 100; 26) and patients with valid AV conduction (WP ≥ 100; 17). In the first group patients had a significantly higher number of intraprocedural atrioventricular block (AVB) (20 vs. 1, p < 0.005), showed a significant higher implantation depth in LVOT (7.7 ± 2.2 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.05) and lower ΔMSID (−0.28 ± 3 vs. −3.94 ± 2, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: AV conduction may recover in a significant proportion of patients. In our study, valve implantation depth in the LVOT and intraprocedural AV block are associated with severely impaired AV conduction. Regular PM interrogation and reprogramming are required to avoid unnecessary permanent right ventricular stimulation in patients with AV conduction recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9353552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93535522022-08-06 Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement Pelargonio, Gemma Scacciavillani, Roberto Donisi, Luca Narducci, Maria Lucia Aurigemma, Cristina Pinnacchio, Gaetano Bencardino, Gianluigi Perna, Francesco Spera, Francesco Raffaele Comerci, Gianluca Ruscio, Eleonora Romagnoli, Enrico Crea, Filippo Burzotta, Francesco Trani, Carlo Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) are a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, a significant proportion of patients might recover AV conduction at follow-up. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the recovery of AV conduction by determination through Wenckebach point in patients with PPI and therefore identify patients who could benefit from device reprogramming to avoid unnecessary RV pacing. METHODS: We enrolled 43 patients that underwent PM implantation after TAVI at our Department from January 2018 to January 2021. PM interrogation was performed at follow-up and patients with native spontaneous rhythm were further assessed for AV conduction through WP determination. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients requiring a PM represented the final study population, divided in patients with severely impaired AV conduction (no spontaneous valid rhythm or WP < 100; 26) and patients with valid AV conduction (WP ≥ 100; 17). In the first group patients had a significantly higher number of intraprocedural atrioventricular block (AVB) (20 vs. 1, p < 0.005), showed a significant higher implantation depth in LVOT (7.7 ± 2.2 vs. 4.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.05) and lower ΔMSID (−0.28 ± 3 vs. −3.94 ± 2, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: AV conduction may recover in a significant proportion of patients. In our study, valve implantation depth in the LVOT and intraprocedural AV block are associated with severely impaired AV conduction. Regular PM interrogation and reprogramming are required to avoid unnecessary permanent right ventricular stimulation in patients with AV conduction recovery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9353552/ /pubmed/35935649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.904828 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pelargonio, Scacciavillani, Donisi, Narducci, Aurigemma, Pinnacchio, Bencardino, Perna, Spera, Comerci, Ruscio, Romagnoli, Crea, Burzotta and Trani. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Pelargonio, Gemma Scacciavillani, Roberto Donisi, Luca Narducci, Maria Lucia Aurigemma, Cristina Pinnacchio, Gaetano Bencardino, Gianluigi Perna, Francesco Spera, Francesco Raffaele Comerci, Gianluca Ruscio, Eleonora Romagnoli, Enrico Crea, Filippo Burzotta, Francesco Trani, Carlo Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement |
title | Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement |
title_full | Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement |
title_fullStr | Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement |
title_short | Atrioventricular conduction in PM recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Implications using Wenckebach point measurement |
title_sort | atrioventricular conduction in pm recipients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: implications using wenckebach point measurement |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935649 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.904828 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pelargoniogemma atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT scacciavillaniroberto atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT donisiluca atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT narduccimarialucia atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT aurigemmacristina atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT pinnacchiogaetano atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT bencardinogianluigi atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT pernafrancesco atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT sperafrancescoraffaele atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT comercigianluca atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT ruscioeleonora atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT romagnolienrico atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT creafilippo atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT burzottafrancesco atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement AT tranicarlo atrioventricularconductioninpmrecipientsaftertranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationimplicationsusingwenckebachpointmeasurement |