Cargando…
Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch
To evaluate the accuracy of the smartwatch in estimating carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). A cohort of gender-matched volunteers aged 18–80 years were recruited. At the sitting and supine positions, cfPWV was measured alternately by smartwatch and CompliorAnalyse, for each participant, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.893557 |
_version_ | 1784762889451601920 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Ningling Wang, Luyan Xi, Yang Wang, Hongyi Yang, Fan Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Jing Cui, Yuxian Zeng, Zhechun |
author_facet | Sun, Ningling Wang, Luyan Xi, Yang Wang, Hongyi Yang, Fan Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Jing Cui, Yuxian Zeng, Zhechun |
author_sort | Sun, Ningling |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the accuracy of the smartwatch in estimating carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). A cohort of gender-matched volunteers aged 18–80 years were recruited. At the sitting and supine positions, cfPWV was measured alternately by smartwatch and CompliorAnalyse, for each participant, and nine sets of data were collected from each participant with a 60 s interval between measurements. The accuracy of cfPWV measurement for smartwatches was assessed using mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE), while the consistency of the two methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis and concordance class correlation. A total of 347 participants were enrolled. The mean cfPWV was 9.01 ± 2.29 m/s measured by CompliorAnalyse and 9.06 ± 1.94 m/s by smartwatch. The consistency correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.9045 (95% CI 0.8853–0.9206), the ME was 0.046 ± 0.92, and the MAE was 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.73). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the error of 95% samples was in the range between −1.77 m/s and 1.86 m/s. The Kappa value of cfPWV greater than 10 m/s was 0.79, the area under the ROC curve was 0.97 (P < 0.001), sensitivity was 0.90, specificity was 0.93, positive predictive value was 0.83 and negative predictive value was 0.96. Smartwatch can accurately estimate cfPWV to evaluate arterial stiffness. This method is simple and feasible and is suitable for people to actively and early monitor vascular elasticity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9353553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93535532022-08-06 Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch Sun, Ningling Wang, Luyan Xi, Yang Wang, Hongyi Yang, Fan Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Jing Cui, Yuxian Zeng, Zhechun Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine To evaluate the accuracy of the smartwatch in estimating carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). A cohort of gender-matched volunteers aged 18–80 years were recruited. At the sitting and supine positions, cfPWV was measured alternately by smartwatch and CompliorAnalyse, for each participant, and nine sets of data were collected from each participant with a 60 s interval between measurements. The accuracy of cfPWV measurement for smartwatches was assessed using mean error (ME) and mean absolute error (MAE), while the consistency of the two methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman analysis and concordance class correlation. A total of 347 participants were enrolled. The mean cfPWV was 9.01 ± 2.29 m/s measured by CompliorAnalyse and 9.06 ± 1.94 m/s by smartwatch. The consistency correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.9045 (95% CI 0.8853–0.9206), the ME was 0.046 ± 0.92, and the MAE was 0.66 (95% CI 0.59–0.73). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the error of 95% samples was in the range between −1.77 m/s and 1.86 m/s. The Kappa value of cfPWV greater than 10 m/s was 0.79, the area under the ROC curve was 0.97 (P < 0.001), sensitivity was 0.90, specificity was 0.93, positive predictive value was 0.83 and negative predictive value was 0.96. Smartwatch can accurately estimate cfPWV to evaluate arterial stiffness. This method is simple and feasible and is suitable for people to actively and early monitor vascular elasticity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9353553/ /pubmed/35935640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.893557 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Wang, Xi, Wang, Yang, Chen, Liu, Cui and Zeng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Sun, Ningling Wang, Luyan Xi, Yang Wang, Hongyi Yang, Fan Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Jing Cui, Yuxian Zeng, Zhechun Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch |
title | Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch |
title_full | Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch |
title_fullStr | Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch |
title_short | Accuracy Evaluation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Estimated by Smart Terminal Watch |
title_sort | accuracy evaluation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity estimated by smart terminal watch |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35935640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.893557 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunningling accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT wangluyan accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT xiyang accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT wanghongyi accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT yangfan accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT chenyuanyuan accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT liujing accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT cuiyuxian accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch AT zengzhechun accuracyevaluationofcarotidfemoralpulsewavevelocityestimatedbysmartterminalwatch |