Cargando…

Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting various diagnostic criteria for diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are consensus-based, needs for additional evidence related to outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this systematic-review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of different GDM diagnostic-cri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani, Naz, Marzieh Saei Ghare, Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh, Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Diabetes Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0178
_version_ 1784762890634395648
author Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani
Naz, Marzieh Saei Ghare
Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh
Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira
author_facet Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani
Naz, Marzieh Saei Ghare
Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh
Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira
author_sort Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting various diagnostic criteria for diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are consensus-based, needs for additional evidence related to outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this systematic-review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of different GDM diagnostic-criteria on the risk of adverse-neonatal-outcomes. METHODS: Electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Sciences were searched to retrieve English original, population-based studies with the universal GDM screening approach, up to January-2020. GDM diagnostic criteria were classified in seven groups and International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) was considered as reference one. We used the Mantel–Haenszel method to calculate the pooled odds of events. The possibility of publication bias was examined by Begg’s test. RESULTS: A total of 55 population-based studies consisting of 1,604,391 pregnant women with GDM and 7,770,855 non-GDM counterparts were included. Results showed that in all diagnostic-criteria subgroups, the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes including macrosomia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, preterm birth, and birth-trauma were significantly higher than the non-GDM counterparts were significantly higher than non-GDM counterparts. Meta-regression analysis revealed that the magnitude of neonatal risks in all diagnostic-criteria subgroups are similar. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the risk of adverse-neonatal-outcome increased among women with GDM, but the magnitude of risk was not different among those women who were diagnosed through more or less intensive strategies. These findings may help health-care-providers and policy-makers to select the most cost-effective approach for the screening of GDM among pregnant women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9353558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93535582022-08-11 Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani Naz, Marzieh Saei Ghare Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira Diabetes Metab J Original Article BACKGROUND: Evidence supporting various diagnostic criteria for diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are consensus-based, needs for additional evidence related to outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this systematic-review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of different GDM diagnostic-criteria on the risk of adverse-neonatal-outcomes. METHODS: Electronic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Sciences were searched to retrieve English original, population-based studies with the universal GDM screening approach, up to January-2020. GDM diagnostic criteria were classified in seven groups and International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) was considered as reference one. We used the Mantel–Haenszel method to calculate the pooled odds of events. The possibility of publication bias was examined by Begg’s test. RESULTS: A total of 55 population-based studies consisting of 1,604,391 pregnant women with GDM and 7,770,855 non-GDM counterparts were included. Results showed that in all diagnostic-criteria subgroups, the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes including macrosomia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, preterm birth, and birth-trauma were significantly higher than the non-GDM counterparts were significantly higher than non-GDM counterparts. Meta-regression analysis revealed that the magnitude of neonatal risks in all diagnostic-criteria subgroups are similar. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the risk of adverse-neonatal-outcome increased among women with GDM, but the magnitude of risk was not different among those women who were diagnosed through more or less intensive strategies. These findings may help health-care-providers and policy-makers to select the most cost-effective approach for the screening of GDM among pregnant women. Korean Diabetes Association 2022-07 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9353558/ /pubmed/35255550 http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0178 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Diabetes Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani
Naz, Marzieh Saei Ghare
Bidhendi-Yarandi, Razieh
Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira
Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_full Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_fullStr Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_short Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
title_sort effect of different types of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus on adverse neonatal outcomes: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353558/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0178
work_keys_str_mv AT tehranifahimehramezani effectofdifferenttypesofdiagnosticcriteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitusonadverseneonataloutcomesasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT nazmarziehsaeighare effectofdifferenttypesofdiagnosticcriteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitusonadverseneonataloutcomesasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT bidhendiyarandirazieh effectofdifferenttypesofdiagnosticcriteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitusonadverseneonataloutcomesasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression
AT behboudigandevanisamira effectofdifferenttypesofdiagnosticcriteriaforgestationaldiabetesmellitusonadverseneonataloutcomesasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandmetaregression