Cargando…
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY
The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanhydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY by Novozymes A/S. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7467 |
_version_ | 1784762907570995200 |
---|---|
author | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
author_facet | Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanhydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY by Novozymes A/S. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. It is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrup and other starch hydrolysates, and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of total organic solids are removed by distillation and by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups, dietary exposure estimation was considered unnecessary. The production strain of the food enzyme fulfils the requirements for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. As no other concerns arising from the manufacturing process have been identified, the Panel considers that toxicological tests are not needed for the assessment of this food enzyme. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production) the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme did not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9353655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93536552022-08-09 Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew EFSA J Scientific Opinion The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanhydrolase; EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY by Novozymes A/S. The genetic modifications do not give rise to safety concerns. The food enzyme is considered free from viable cells of the production organism and its DNA. It is intended to be used in starch processing for the production of glucose syrup and other starch hydrolysates, and distilled alcohol production. Since residual amounts of total organic solids are removed by distillation and by the purification steps applied during the production of glucose syrups, dietary exposure estimation was considered unnecessary. The production strain of the food enzyme fulfils the requirements for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. As no other concerns arising from the manufacturing process have been identified, the Panel considers that toxicological tests are not needed for the assessment of this food enzyme. A search for similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and one match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use (other than distilled alcohol production) the risk of allergic sensitisation and elicitation reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is considered to be low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme did not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9353655/ /pubmed/35949930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7467 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Lambré, Claude Barat Baviera, José Manuel Bolognesi, Claudia Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro Crebelli, Riccardo Gott, David Michael Grob, Konrad Lampi, Evgenia Mengelers, Marcel Mortensen, Alicja Rivière, Gilles Steffensen, Inger‐Lise Tlustos, Christina Van Loveren, Henk Vernis, Laurence Zorn, Holger Glandorf, Boet Aguilera, Jaime Liu, Yi Chesson, Andrew Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY |
title | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY
|
title_full | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY
|
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY
|
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY
|
title_short | Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain NZYM‐AY
|
title_sort | safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified bacillus licheniformis strain nzym‐ay |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949930 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT lambreclaude safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT bolognesiclaudia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT cocconcellipiersandro safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT crebelliriccardo safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT gottdavidmichael safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT grobkonrad safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT lampievgenia safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT mengelersmarcel safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT mortensenalicja safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT rivieregilles safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT steffenseningerlise safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT tlustoschristina safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT vanloverenhenk safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT vernislaurence safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT zornholger safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT glandorfboet safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT aguilerajaime safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT liuyi safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay AT chessonandrew safetyevaluationofthefoodenzymeaamylasefromthegeneticallymodifiedbacilluslicheniformisstrainnzymay |