Cargando…

Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation

BACKGROUND: Safe and effective analgesia strategy remains one of the priorities for pediatric inguinal hernia treatment. AIM: To explore safety and efficacy of dexmededomidine monotherapy for postoperative analgesia in children who received laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Guang, Zhang, Ling, Wang, Hui-Se, Lin, Yi, Jin, Hong-Quan, Wang, Xiao-Dan, Qiao, Wei-Na, Zhang, Ya-Tao, Sun, Jiao-Qian, Liu, Zhi-Na
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157988
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7376
_version_ 1784762952954413056
author Liu, Guang
Zhang, Ling
Wang, Hui-Se
Lin, Yi
Jin, Hong-Quan
Wang, Xiao-Dan
Qiao, Wei-Na
Zhang, Ya-Tao
Sun, Jiao-Qian
Liu, Zhi-Na
author_facet Liu, Guang
Zhang, Ling
Wang, Hui-Se
Lin, Yi
Jin, Hong-Quan
Wang, Xiao-Dan
Qiao, Wei-Na
Zhang, Ya-Tao
Sun, Jiao-Qian
Liu, Zhi-Na
author_sort Liu, Guang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Safe and effective analgesia strategy remains one of the priorities for pediatric inguinal hernia treatment. AIM: To explore safety and efficacy of dexmededomidine monotherapy for postoperative analgesia in children who received laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation. METHODS: This randomized single-center controlled trial included 390 children (aged 1-3 years, ASA grade I-II), randomly divided into a dexmededomidine group (D group), a dexmededomidine + sufentanil group (DS group), and a sufentanil group (S group). The primary endpoint was percentage of children with the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score ≤ 3 points 2 h after surgery. RESULTS: The comparisons of the FLACC scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h were not significantly different among the three groups (P > 0.05). The sedative effects in the D group were significantly better than those in the S group (P > 0.05), but not significantly different from those in the DS group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the D group than in the S group and DS group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Analgesic effects of dexmededomidine monotherapy are comparable to those of sufentanil alone or in combination with dexmededomidine for children who underwent laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation, with better sedative effects and a lower incidence of adverse events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9353900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93539002022-09-23 Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation Liu, Guang Zhang, Ling Wang, Hui-Se Lin, Yi Jin, Hong-Quan Wang, Xiao-Dan Qiao, Wei-Na Zhang, Ya-Tao Sun, Jiao-Qian Liu, Zhi-Na World J Clin Cases Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Safe and effective analgesia strategy remains one of the priorities for pediatric inguinal hernia treatment. AIM: To explore safety and efficacy of dexmededomidine monotherapy for postoperative analgesia in children who received laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation. METHODS: This randomized single-center controlled trial included 390 children (aged 1-3 years, ASA grade I-II), randomly divided into a dexmededomidine group (D group), a dexmededomidine + sufentanil group (DS group), and a sufentanil group (S group). The primary endpoint was percentage of children with the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score ≤ 3 points 2 h after surgery. RESULTS: The comparisons of the FLACC scores at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h were not significantly different among the three groups (P > 0.05). The sedative effects in the D group were significantly better than those in the S group (P > 0.05), but not significantly different from those in the DS group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the D group than in the S group and DS group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Analgesic effects of dexmededomidine monotherapy are comparable to those of sufentanil alone or in combination with dexmededomidine for children who underwent laparoscopic unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation, with better sedative effects and a lower incidence of adverse events. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-07-26 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9353900/ /pubmed/36157988 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7376 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Randomized Clinical Trial
Liu, Guang
Zhang, Ling
Wang, Hui-Se
Lin, Yi
Jin, Hong-Quan
Wang, Xiao-Dan
Qiao, Wei-Na
Zhang, Ya-Tao
Sun, Jiao-Qian
Liu, Zhi-Na
Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation
title Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation
title_full Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation
title_fullStr Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation
title_full_unstemmed Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation
title_short Dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation
title_sort dexmededomidine in pediatric unilateral internal inguinal ring ligation
topic Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157988
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i21.7376
work_keys_str_mv AT liuguang dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT zhangling dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT wanghuise dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT linyi dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT jinhongquan dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT wangxiaodan dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT qiaoweina dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT zhangyatao dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT sunjiaoqian dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation
AT liuzhina dexmededomidineinpediatricunilateralinternalinguinalringligation