Cargando…
No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise
The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether auditory brainstem response (ABR) and speech perception in noise (SPiN) were associated with occupational noise exposure in normal hearing young factory workers. Forty young adults occupationally exposed to noise and 40 non-exposed young adult...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.915211 |
_version_ | 1784762972971728896 |
---|---|
author | Pinsonnault-Skvarenina, Alexis Moïn-Darbari, Karina Zhao, Wulan Zhang, Meibian Qiu, Wei Fuente, Adrian |
author_facet | Pinsonnault-Skvarenina, Alexis Moïn-Darbari, Karina Zhao, Wulan Zhang, Meibian Qiu, Wei Fuente, Adrian |
author_sort | Pinsonnault-Skvarenina, Alexis |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether auditory brainstem response (ABR) and speech perception in noise (SPiN) were associated with occupational noise exposure in normal hearing young factory workers. Forty young adults occupationally exposed to noise and 40 non-exposed young adults (control group) from Zhejiang province in China were selected. All participants presented with normal hearing thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Participants were evaluated with the Mandarin Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) test and ABR. The latter was obtained for click stimulus at 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 dBnHL. Peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies for waves I and V were obtained. The ABR wave I amplitude, the wave I/V amplitude ratio, the slope of the wave I amplitude growth as a function of stimulus intensity (AMP-I(Slope)), and the wave V latency shift with ipsilateral noise (LAT-V(Slope)) were used as ABR outcomes. Finally, equivalent continuous average sound pressure level normalized to 8 h (L(Aeq.8h)) and cumulative noise exposure (CNE) were obtained for noise-exposed participants. No significant differences between groups were found for any ABR outcomes. Noise-exposed participants exhibited worse BKB scores than control group participants. A multivariate regression model showed that 23.3% of the variance in BKB scores was explained by group category (exposed vs. non-exposed) and hearing thresholds. However, since none of the ABR outcomes exploring cochlear synaptopathy were associated with noise exposure, we cannot conclude that cochlear synaptopathy was the contributing factor for the differences between groups for BKB scores. Factors that go beyond sensory processing may explain such results, especially given socio-economic differences between the noise-exposed and control groups. We conclude that in this sample of participants, occupational noise exposure was not associated with signs of cochlear synaptopathy as measured by ABR and BKB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9354017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93540172022-08-06 No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise Pinsonnault-Skvarenina, Alexis Moïn-Darbari, Karina Zhao, Wulan Zhang, Meibian Qiu, Wei Fuente, Adrian Front Neurosci Neuroscience The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether auditory brainstem response (ABR) and speech perception in noise (SPiN) were associated with occupational noise exposure in normal hearing young factory workers. Forty young adults occupationally exposed to noise and 40 non-exposed young adults (control group) from Zhejiang province in China were selected. All participants presented with normal hearing thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Participants were evaluated with the Mandarin Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) test and ABR. The latter was obtained for click stimulus at 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 dBnHL. Peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies for waves I and V were obtained. The ABR wave I amplitude, the wave I/V amplitude ratio, the slope of the wave I amplitude growth as a function of stimulus intensity (AMP-I(Slope)), and the wave V latency shift with ipsilateral noise (LAT-V(Slope)) were used as ABR outcomes. Finally, equivalent continuous average sound pressure level normalized to 8 h (L(Aeq.8h)) and cumulative noise exposure (CNE) were obtained for noise-exposed participants. No significant differences between groups were found for any ABR outcomes. Noise-exposed participants exhibited worse BKB scores than control group participants. A multivariate regression model showed that 23.3% of the variance in BKB scores was explained by group category (exposed vs. non-exposed) and hearing thresholds. However, since none of the ABR outcomes exploring cochlear synaptopathy were associated with noise exposure, we cannot conclude that cochlear synaptopathy was the contributing factor for the differences between groups for BKB scores. Factors that go beyond sensory processing may explain such results, especially given socio-economic differences between the noise-exposed and control groups. We conclude that in this sample of participants, occupational noise exposure was not associated with signs of cochlear synaptopathy as measured by ABR and BKB. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9354017/ /pubmed/35937884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.915211 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pinsonnault-Skvarenina, Moïn-Darbari, Zhao, Zhang, Qiu and Fuente. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Pinsonnault-Skvarenina, Alexis Moïn-Darbari, Karina Zhao, Wulan Zhang, Meibian Qiu, Wei Fuente, Adrian No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise |
title | No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise |
title_full | No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise |
title_fullStr | No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise |
title_full_unstemmed | No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise |
title_short | No effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise |
title_sort | no effect of occupational noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and speech perception in noise |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.915211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinsonnaultskvareninaalexis noeffectofoccupationalnoiseexposureonauditorybrainstemresponseandspeechperceptioninnoise AT moindarbarikarina noeffectofoccupationalnoiseexposureonauditorybrainstemresponseandspeechperceptioninnoise AT zhaowulan noeffectofoccupationalnoiseexposureonauditorybrainstemresponseandspeechperceptioninnoise AT zhangmeibian noeffectofoccupationalnoiseexposureonauditorybrainstemresponseandspeechperceptioninnoise AT qiuwei noeffectofoccupationalnoiseexposureonauditorybrainstemresponseandspeechperceptioninnoise AT fuenteadrian noeffectofoccupationalnoiseexposureonauditorybrainstemresponseandspeechperceptioninnoise |