Cargando…

MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES

BACKGROUND: Safety of immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treatment remains incompletely understood. We aim to identify whether timing of IO/TT in relation to SRS impacts rates of adverse radiation effect (ARE) in MBM....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phuong, Christina, Vasudevan, Harish N, Chen, William C, Raleigh, David R, Fogh, Shannon, Boreta, Lauren, Daras, Mariza, Tsai, Katy, Nakamura, Jean, Sneed, Penny K, Braunstein, Steve E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354150/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.066
_version_ 1784763002956808192
author Phuong, Christina
Vasudevan, Harish N
Chen, William C
Raleigh, David R
Fogh, Shannon
Boreta, Lauren
Daras, Mariza
Tsai, Katy
Nakamura, Jean
Sneed, Penny K
Braunstein, Steve E
author_facet Phuong, Christina
Vasudevan, Harish N
Chen, William C
Raleigh, David R
Fogh, Shannon
Boreta, Lauren
Daras, Mariza
Tsai, Katy
Nakamura, Jean
Sneed, Penny K
Braunstein, Steve E
author_sort Phuong, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Safety of immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treatment remains incompletely understood. We aim to identify whether timing of IO/TT in relation to SRS impacts rates of adverse radiation effect (ARE) in MBM. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with MBM treated with SRS and IO/TT within three months prior and one year after SRS, from 2011-2021 at a single institution with at least two months MRI follow-up, identified 108 patients with 939 unique MBM meeting criteria. ARE was confirmed on independent imaging review. Concurrent IO/TT was defined as receiving IO/TT within 4 weeks before or after SRS. Data analysis was performed with the univariate cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median radiographic follow-up from time of SRS was 16months. IO/TT was initiated prior to SRS for 681 (72.5%) metastases and after SRS for 258 (27.5%) metastases. 837 (89.1%) metastases received concurrent IO/TT. Most common IO agents were ipilimumab (n=416), nivolumab (n=448), and pembrolizumab (n=203). Most common TT agents were dabrafenib (n=548), trametinib (n=540), and vemurafenib (n=81). 2-year local progression-free survival (PFS), distant intracranial PFS, and overall survival were 94.1%, 33.3%, and 55.2%, respectively. 55 (5.9%) metastases in 33 (30.6%) patients experienced ARE. Median time to ARE was 5mo (IQR 4-9mo). Of those who experienced ARE, 22 (66.7%) patients were symptomatic and treated with steroids; 12 (36.4%) patients underwent surgical intervention. ARE rates were not impacted by concurrent vs nonconcurrent IO/TT (5.5% vs 4.9%, p=0.34) nor IO/TT initiation pre vs post SRS (6.0% vs 5.4%, p=0.61). CONCLUSION: IO/TT in conjunction with SRS resulted in low ARE rates as compared to historical controls in the pre-IO/TT era. Timing of IO/TT in relation to SRS may not significantly impact ARE rates in MBM treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9354150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93541502022-08-09 MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES Phuong, Christina Vasudevan, Harish N Chen, William C Raleigh, David R Fogh, Shannon Boreta, Lauren Daras, Mariza Tsai, Katy Nakamura, Jean Sneed, Penny K Braunstein, Steve E Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts BACKGROUND: Safety of immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treatment remains incompletely understood. We aim to identify whether timing of IO/TT in relation to SRS impacts rates of adverse radiation effect (ARE) in MBM. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with MBM treated with SRS and IO/TT within three months prior and one year after SRS, from 2011-2021 at a single institution with at least two months MRI follow-up, identified 108 patients with 939 unique MBM meeting criteria. ARE was confirmed on independent imaging review. Concurrent IO/TT was defined as receiving IO/TT within 4 weeks before or after SRS. Data analysis was performed with the univariate cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median radiographic follow-up from time of SRS was 16months. IO/TT was initiated prior to SRS for 681 (72.5%) metastases and after SRS for 258 (27.5%) metastases. 837 (89.1%) metastases received concurrent IO/TT. Most common IO agents were ipilimumab (n=416), nivolumab (n=448), and pembrolizumab (n=203). Most common TT agents were dabrafenib (n=548), trametinib (n=540), and vemurafenib (n=81). 2-year local progression-free survival (PFS), distant intracranial PFS, and overall survival were 94.1%, 33.3%, and 55.2%, respectively. 55 (5.9%) metastases in 33 (30.6%) patients experienced ARE. Median time to ARE was 5mo (IQR 4-9mo). Of those who experienced ARE, 22 (66.7%) patients were symptomatic and treated with steroids; 12 (36.4%) patients underwent surgical intervention. ARE rates were not impacted by concurrent vs nonconcurrent IO/TT (5.5% vs 4.9%, p=0.34) nor IO/TT initiation pre vs post SRS (6.0% vs 5.4%, p=0.61). CONCLUSION: IO/TT in conjunction with SRS resulted in low ARE rates as compared to historical controls in the pre-IO/TT era. Timing of IO/TT in relation to SRS may not significantly impact ARE rates in MBM treatment. Oxford University Press 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9354150/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.066 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Abstracts
Phuong, Christina
Vasudevan, Harish N
Chen, William C
Raleigh, David R
Fogh, Shannon
Boreta, Lauren
Daras, Mariza
Tsai, Katy
Nakamura, Jean
Sneed, Penny K
Braunstein, Steve E
MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES
title MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES
title_full MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES
title_fullStr MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES
title_full_unstemmed MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES
title_short MMAP-10 ADVERSE RADIATION EFFECT AFTER STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY AND IMMUNOTHERAPY/TARGETED THERAPY FOR MELANOMA BRAIN METASTASES
title_sort mmap-10 adverse radiation effect after stereotactic radiosurgery and immunotherapy/targeted therapy for melanoma brain metastases
topic Supplement Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354150/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.066
work_keys_str_mv AT phuongchristina mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT vasudevanharishn mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT chenwilliamc mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT raleighdavidr mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT foghshannon mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT boretalauren mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT darasmariza mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT tsaikaty mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT nakamurajean mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT sneedpennyk mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases
AT braunsteinstevee mmap10adverseradiationeffectafterstereotacticradiosurgeryandimmunotherapytargetedtherapyformelanomabrainmetastases