Cargando…

SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS

BACKGROUND: Spine metastases are a common occurrence in cancer patients and result in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotecha, Rupesh, Schiro, Brian, Sporrer, Justin, Rubens, Muni, Avendano, Maria, Appel, Haley, Tom, Martin, Mehta, Minesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354164/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.042
_version_ 1784763006472683520
author Kotecha, Rupesh
Schiro, Brian
Sporrer, Justin
Rubens, Muni
Avendano, Maria
Appel, Haley
Tom, Martin
Mehta, Minesh
author_facet Kotecha, Rupesh
Schiro, Brian
Sporrer, Justin
Rubens, Muni
Avendano, Maria
Appel, Haley
Tom, Martin
Mehta, Minesh
author_sort Kotecha, Rupesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spine metastases are a common occurrence in cancer patients and result in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with modest rates of pain relief, high rates of disease recurrence, low response rates for those with radioresistant histologies, and limited improvement in neurologic deficits. The addition of radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (RFA/PVA) to index sites together with EBRT may improve pain response rates and corresponding quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with spine metastases from T5-L5, stratified according to tumor type (radioresistant vs. radiosensitive) in which patients in each stratum are randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either RFA/PVA and EBRT or EBRT alone. All patients are treated with EBRT to a dose of 20-30 Gy in 5-10 fractions. The target parameters are measured and recorded at the baseline clinic visit, and daily at home with collection of weekly measurements at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months following treatment with imaging and QOL assessments. DISCUSSION: The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether RFA/PVA in addition to EBRT improves pain control compared to palliative EBRT alone for patients with spine metastases, defined as complete or partial pain relief (measured using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale [NRPS]) at 3 months. Secondary objectives include determining whether combined modality treatment improves the rapidity of pain response, duration of pain response, patient reported pain impact, health utility, and overall QOL. The results from this study will be used to allow for comparisons to alternative treatment approaches. This trial was activated 5/2020 and is open to accrual.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9354164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93541642022-08-09 SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS Kotecha, Rupesh Schiro, Brian Sporrer, Justin Rubens, Muni Avendano, Maria Appel, Haley Tom, Martin Mehta, Minesh Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts BACKGROUND: Spine metastases are a common occurrence in cancer patients and result in pain, neurologic deficits, decline in performance status, disability, inferior quality of life (QOL), and reduction in ability to receive cancer-directed therapies. Conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is associated with modest rates of pain relief, high rates of disease recurrence, low response rates for those with radioresistant histologies, and limited improvement in neurologic deficits. The addition of radiofrequency ablation/percutaneous vertebral augmentation (RFA/PVA) to index sites together with EBRT may improve pain response rates and corresponding quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in patients with spine metastases from T5-L5, stratified according to tumor type (radioresistant vs. radiosensitive) in which patients in each stratum are randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either RFA/PVA and EBRT or EBRT alone. All patients are treated with EBRT to a dose of 20-30 Gy in 5-10 fractions. The target parameters are measured and recorded at the baseline clinic visit, and daily at home with collection of weekly measurements at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after treatment, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months following treatment with imaging and QOL assessments. DISCUSSION: The primary objective of this randomized trial is to determine whether RFA/PVA in addition to EBRT improves pain control compared to palliative EBRT alone for patients with spine metastases, defined as complete or partial pain relief (measured using the Numerical Rating Pain Scale [NRPS]) at 3 months. Secondary objectives include determining whether combined modality treatment improves the rapidity of pain response, duration of pain response, patient reported pain impact, health utility, and overall QOL. The results from this study will be used to allow for comparisons to alternative treatment approaches. This trial was activated 5/2020 and is open to accrual. Oxford University Press 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9354164/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.042 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Abstracts
Kotecha, Rupesh
Schiro, Brian
Sporrer, Justin
Rubens, Muni
Avendano, Maria
Appel, Haley
Tom, Martin
Mehta, Minesh
SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS
title SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS
title_full SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS
title_fullStr SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS
title_full_unstemmed SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS
title_short SPIN-01 RADIATION THERAPY ALONE VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY PLUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION/VERTEBRAL AUGMENTATION FOR SPINE METASTASIS: TRIAL IN PROGRESS
title_sort spin-01 radiation therapy alone versus radiation therapy plus radiofrequency ablation/vertebral augmentation for spine metastasis: trial in progress
topic Supplement Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354164/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.042
work_keys_str_mv AT kotecharupesh spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress
AT schirobrian spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress
AT sporrerjustin spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress
AT rubensmuni spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress
AT avendanomaria spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress
AT appelhaley spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress
AT tommartin spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress
AT mehtaminesh spin01radiationtherapyaloneversusradiationtherapyplusradiofrequencyablationvertebralaugmentationforspinemetastasistrialinprogress