Cargando…
CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME?
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been the gold standard for evaluating medical treatments for many decades. Randomization reduces systematic biases resulting from treatment or patient selection, whereby the improvement in clinical outcomes may be attributed to the experimental therapy under s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354198/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.037 |
_version_ | 1784763012377214976 |
---|---|
author | Polley, Mei-Yin Schwartz, Daniel Dignam, James |
author_facet | Polley, Mei-Yin Schwartz, Daniel Dignam, James |
author_sort | Polley, Mei-Yin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been the gold standard for evaluating medical treatments for many decades. Randomization reduces systematic biases resulting from treatment or patient selection, whereby the improvement in clinical outcomes may be attributed to the experimental therapy under study. However, RCTs are often criticized for requiring large sample sizes and taking a long time to complete. For newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), the clinical trial landscape has seen little progress since the establishment of the standard of care (SOC) by Stupp. Given the urgent need for better therapies, it has been argued that data collected from patients treated with the SOC from past GBM trials can provide high-quality external control data to supplement concurrent control arm in future trials, thereby increasing drug development efficiency by reducing the number of patients treated with SOC. Herein we consider a new design approach that leverages historical control data in the design and analysis of phase 3 GBM trials. At the first stage, patients are randomized with an equal probability to standard (concurrent control) arm and experimental arm. An interim analysis entails an outcome comparison between the concurrent and external control arms. If comparability is established, the external control data are carried forward to be combined with concurrent control data at the second stage where the randomization ratio is adapted to favor the experimental therapy, thereby reducing the number of patients treated in the concurrent control arm. Using completed phase 3 GBM trials, we elucidate the potential gain in design efficiency and draw caution to scenarios where it may fall short on meeting statistical criteria. We highlight practical challenges in its implementation and conclude that the new method is not ready for definitive phase 3 GBM studies at the current time. This work represents a critical appraisal of this new concept in GBM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9354198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93541982022-08-09 CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME? Polley, Mei-Yin Schwartz, Daniel Dignam, James Neurooncol Adv Supplement Abstracts Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been the gold standard for evaluating medical treatments for many decades. Randomization reduces systematic biases resulting from treatment or patient selection, whereby the improvement in clinical outcomes may be attributed to the experimental therapy under study. However, RCTs are often criticized for requiring large sample sizes and taking a long time to complete. For newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), the clinical trial landscape has seen little progress since the establishment of the standard of care (SOC) by Stupp. Given the urgent need for better therapies, it has been argued that data collected from patients treated with the SOC from past GBM trials can provide high-quality external control data to supplement concurrent control arm in future trials, thereby increasing drug development efficiency by reducing the number of patients treated with SOC. Herein we consider a new design approach that leverages historical control data in the design and analysis of phase 3 GBM trials. At the first stage, patients are randomized with an equal probability to standard (concurrent control) arm and experimental arm. An interim analysis entails an outcome comparison between the concurrent and external control arms. If comparability is established, the external control data are carried forward to be combined with concurrent control data at the second stage where the randomization ratio is adapted to favor the experimental therapy, thereby reducing the number of patients treated in the concurrent control arm. Using completed phase 3 GBM trials, we elucidate the potential gain in design efficiency and draw caution to scenarios where it may fall short on meeting statistical criteria. We highlight practical challenges in its implementation and conclude that the new method is not ready for definitive phase 3 GBM studies at the current time. This work represents a critical appraisal of this new concept in GBM. Oxford University Press 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9354198/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.037 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Abstracts Polley, Mei-Yin Schwartz, Daniel Dignam, James CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME? |
title | CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME? |
title_full | CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME? |
title_fullStr | CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME? |
title_full_unstemmed | CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME? |
title_short | CLRM-17 USE OF EXTERNAL CONTROL DATA FOR PLANNING AND ANALYZING GBM TRIALS: READY FOR PRIME TIME? |
title_sort | clrm-17 use of external control data for planning and analyzing gbm trials: ready for prime time? |
topic | Supplement Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354198/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polleymeiyin clrm17useofexternalcontroldataforplanningandanalyzinggbmtrialsreadyforprimetime AT schwartzdaniel clrm17useofexternalcontroldataforplanningandanalyzinggbmtrialsreadyforprimetime AT dignamjames clrm17useofexternalcontroldataforplanningandanalyzinggbmtrialsreadyforprimetime |