Cargando…

Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study

BACKGROUND: To outline how the training program and work situation of residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) was affected by the pandemic and to illuminate how residents experienced these changes. METHODS: As part of the COVID-19 in Pregnancy and Early Childhood Staff (COPE Staff) cohort st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wådell, Matilda, Örtqvist, Anne K., Linden, Karolina, Akerstrom, Magnus, Andersson, Ola, Carlsson, Ylva, Graner, Sofie, Jonsson, Maria, Naurin, Elin, Sengpiel, Verena, Veje, Malin, Wessberg, Anna, Zaigham, Mehreen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03631-0
_version_ 1784763040285065216
author Wådell, Matilda
Örtqvist, Anne K.
Linden, Karolina
Akerstrom, Magnus
Andersson, Ola
Carlsson, Ylva
Graner, Sofie
Jonsson, Maria
Naurin, Elin
Sengpiel, Verena
Veje, Malin
Wessberg, Anna
Zaigham, Mehreen
author_facet Wådell, Matilda
Örtqvist, Anne K.
Linden, Karolina
Akerstrom, Magnus
Andersson, Ola
Carlsson, Ylva
Graner, Sofie
Jonsson, Maria
Naurin, Elin
Sengpiel, Verena
Veje, Malin
Wessberg, Anna
Zaigham, Mehreen
author_sort Wådell, Matilda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To outline how the training program and work situation of residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) was affected by the pandemic and to illuminate how residents experienced these changes. METHODS: As part of the COVID-19 in Pregnancy and Early Childhood Staff (COPE Staff) cohort study, between January and May 2021, all participating residents were invited to answer a 28-question online Resident Survey focusing on their specialist education, work situation and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were given in percentages for categorical variables and means and standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables. Univariate comparative analyses were performed with the use of the Pearson’s Chi-2-test for dichotomous data. The association between residents’ worry about the quality and length of their specialist training, with extra clinical hours and transfer to other healthcare institutions were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Free text responses were analyzed by content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 162 participating OB-GYN residents, 69% expressed concern that the pandemic would have a negative impact on their training. Ninety-five (95%) reported cancellation/postponement of educational activities, 70% performed fewer surgeries and 27% had been transferred to other healthcare institutions where about half reported having gained more general knowledge as a physician. Working extra clinical hours was reported by 69% (7.4 ± 5.3 hours per week) and 14% had considered changing their profession due to the pandemic. Senior residents, compared to junior residents, more often experienced cancelled/postponed clinical rotations (30% vs 15%, P=0.02) and reported performing fewer surgeries (P=0.02). The qualitative analysis highlighted the lack of surgical procedural training as a major concern for residents. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has strongly impacted the training program and work situation of OB-GYN residents in Sweden. Residents were concerned over the negative impact of the pandemic on their training program and senior residents reported more missed educational opportunities as compared to junior residents. Program directors, head of institutions and clinical supervisors can use the problem areas pinpointed by this study to support residents and compensate for missed educational opportunities. While hands-on-training and operating time cannot be compensated for, the authors hope that the findings of the study can help develop new strategies to minimize the negative impact of the current and future pandemics on resident education and work situation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9354310
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93543102022-08-06 Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study Wådell, Matilda Örtqvist, Anne K. Linden, Karolina Akerstrom, Magnus Andersson, Ola Carlsson, Ylva Graner, Sofie Jonsson, Maria Naurin, Elin Sengpiel, Verena Veje, Malin Wessberg, Anna Zaigham, Mehreen BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: To outline how the training program and work situation of residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) was affected by the pandemic and to illuminate how residents experienced these changes. METHODS: As part of the COVID-19 in Pregnancy and Early Childhood Staff (COPE Staff) cohort study, between January and May 2021, all participating residents were invited to answer a 28-question online Resident Survey focusing on their specialist education, work situation and experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were given in percentages for categorical variables and means and standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables. Univariate comparative analyses were performed with the use of the Pearson’s Chi-2-test for dichotomous data. The association between residents’ worry about the quality and length of their specialist training, with extra clinical hours and transfer to other healthcare institutions were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Free text responses were analyzed by content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 162 participating OB-GYN residents, 69% expressed concern that the pandemic would have a negative impact on their training. Ninety-five (95%) reported cancellation/postponement of educational activities, 70% performed fewer surgeries and 27% had been transferred to other healthcare institutions where about half reported having gained more general knowledge as a physician. Working extra clinical hours was reported by 69% (7.4 ± 5.3 hours per week) and 14% had considered changing their profession due to the pandemic. Senior residents, compared to junior residents, more often experienced cancelled/postponed clinical rotations (30% vs 15%, P=0.02) and reported performing fewer surgeries (P=0.02). The qualitative analysis highlighted the lack of surgical procedural training as a major concern for residents. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has strongly impacted the training program and work situation of OB-GYN residents in Sweden. Residents were concerned over the negative impact of the pandemic on their training program and senior residents reported more missed educational opportunities as compared to junior residents. Program directors, head of institutions and clinical supervisors can use the problem areas pinpointed by this study to support residents and compensate for missed educational opportunities. While hands-on-training and operating time cannot be compensated for, the authors hope that the findings of the study can help develop new strategies to minimize the negative impact of the current and future pandemics on resident education and work situation. BioMed Central 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9354310/ /pubmed/35927725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03631-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wådell, Matilda
Örtqvist, Anne K.
Linden, Karolina
Akerstrom, Magnus
Andersson, Ola
Carlsson, Ylva
Graner, Sofie
Jonsson, Maria
Naurin, Elin
Sengpiel, Verena
Veje, Malin
Wessberg, Anna
Zaigham, Mehreen
Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study
title Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study
title_full Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study
title_fullStr Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study
title_short Challenges imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on the Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods Swedish survey in the COPE Staff cohort study
title_sort challenges imposed by the covid-19 pandemic on the obstetrics and gynecology residency program: a mixed-methods swedish survey in the cope staff cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354310/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03631-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wadellmatilda challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT ortqvistannek challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT lindenkarolina challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT akerstrommagnus challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT anderssonola challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT carlssonylva challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT granersofie challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT jonssonmaria challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT naurinelin challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT sengpielverena challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT vejemalin challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT wessberganna challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy
AT zaighammehreen challengesimposedbythecovid19pandemicontheobstetricsandgynecologyresidencyprogramamixedmethodsswedishsurveyinthecopestaffcohortstudy