Cargando…
Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
BACKGROUND: Genotype status of glioma have important significance to clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there are few studies on the prediction of multiple genotype status in glioma by method of multi-sequence radiomics. The purpose of the study is to compare the performance of clinical f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35931979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8 |
_version_ | 1784763053632389120 |
---|---|
author | He, Jinlong Ren, Jialiang Niu, Guangming Liu, Aishi Wu, Qiong Xie, Shenghui Ma, Xueying Li, Bo Wang, Peng Shen, Jing Wu, Jianlin Gao, Yang |
author_facet | He, Jinlong Ren, Jialiang Niu, Guangming Liu, Aishi Wu, Qiong Xie, Shenghui Ma, Xueying Li, Bo Wang, Peng Shen, Jing Wu, Jianlin Gao, Yang |
author_sort | He, Jinlong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genotype status of glioma have important significance to clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there are few studies on the prediction of multiple genotype status in glioma by method of multi-sequence radiomics. The purpose of the study is to compare the performance of clinical features (age, sex, WHO grade, MRI morphological features etc.), radiomics features from multi MR sequence (T2WI, T1WI, DWI, ADC, CE-MRI (contrast enhancement)), and a combined multiple features model in predicting biomarker status (IDH, MGMT, TERT, 1p/19q of glioma. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 81 glioma patients confirmed by histology were enrolled in this study. Five MRI sequences were used for radiomic feature extraction. Finally, 107 features were extracted from each sequence on Pyradiomics software, separately. These included 18 first-order metrics, such as the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis etc., 14 shape features and second-order metrics including 24 grey level run length matrix (GLCM), 16 grey level run length matrix (GLRLM), 16 grey level size zone matrix (GLSZM), 5 neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), and 14 grey level dependence matrix (GLDM). Then, Univariate analysis and LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model were used to data dimension reduction, feature selection, and radiomics signature building. Significant features (p < 0.05 by multivariate logistic regression were retained to establish clinical model, T1WI model, T2WI model, T1 + C (T1WI contrast enhancement model, DWI model and ADC model, multi sequence model. Clinical features were combined with multi sequence model to establish a combined model. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: The combined model showed the better performance in some groups of genotype status among some models (IDH AUC = 0.93, MGMT AUC = 0.88, TERT AUC = 0.76). Multi sequence model performed better than single sequence model in IDH, MGMT, TERT. There was no significant difference among the models in predicting 1p/19q status. Decision curve analysis showed combined model has higher clinical benefit than multi sequence model. CONCLUSION: Multi sequence model is an effective method to identify the genotype status of cerebral glioma. Combined with clinical models can better distinguish genotype status of glioma. KEY POINTS: The combined model showed the higher performance compare with other models in predicting genotype status of IDH, MGMT, TERT. Multi sequence model showed a better predictive model than that of a single sequence model. Compared with other models, the combined model and multi sequence model show no advantage in prediction of 1p/19q status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9354364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93543642022-08-06 Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status He, Jinlong Ren, Jialiang Niu, Guangming Liu, Aishi Wu, Qiong Xie, Shenghui Ma, Xueying Li, Bo Wang, Peng Shen, Jing Wu, Jianlin Gao, Yang BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: Genotype status of glioma have important significance to clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there are few studies on the prediction of multiple genotype status in glioma by method of multi-sequence radiomics. The purpose of the study is to compare the performance of clinical features (age, sex, WHO grade, MRI morphological features etc.), radiomics features from multi MR sequence (T2WI, T1WI, DWI, ADC, CE-MRI (contrast enhancement)), and a combined multiple features model in predicting biomarker status (IDH, MGMT, TERT, 1p/19q of glioma. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 81 glioma patients confirmed by histology were enrolled in this study. Five MRI sequences were used for radiomic feature extraction. Finally, 107 features were extracted from each sequence on Pyradiomics software, separately. These included 18 first-order metrics, such as the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis etc., 14 shape features and second-order metrics including 24 grey level run length matrix (GLCM), 16 grey level run length matrix (GLRLM), 16 grey level size zone matrix (GLSZM), 5 neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), and 14 grey level dependence matrix (GLDM). Then, Univariate analysis and LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model were used to data dimension reduction, feature selection, and radiomics signature building. Significant features (p < 0.05 by multivariate logistic regression were retained to establish clinical model, T1WI model, T2WI model, T1 + C (T1WI contrast enhancement model, DWI model and ADC model, multi sequence model. Clinical features were combined with multi sequence model to establish a combined model. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: The combined model showed the better performance in some groups of genotype status among some models (IDH AUC = 0.93, MGMT AUC = 0.88, TERT AUC = 0.76). Multi sequence model performed better than single sequence model in IDH, MGMT, TERT. There was no significant difference among the models in predicting 1p/19q status. Decision curve analysis showed combined model has higher clinical benefit than multi sequence model. CONCLUSION: Multi sequence model is an effective method to identify the genotype status of cerebral glioma. Combined with clinical models can better distinguish genotype status of glioma. KEY POINTS: The combined model showed the higher performance compare with other models in predicting genotype status of IDH, MGMT, TERT. Multi sequence model showed a better predictive model than that of a single sequence model. Compared with other models, the combined model and multi sequence model show no advantage in prediction of 1p/19q status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8. BioMed Central 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9354364/ /pubmed/35931979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research He, Jinlong Ren, Jialiang Niu, Guangming Liu, Aishi Wu, Qiong Xie, Shenghui Ma, Xueying Li, Bo Wang, Peng Shen, Jing Wu, Jianlin Gao, Yang Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status |
title | Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status |
title_full | Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status |
title_fullStr | Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status |
title_short | Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status |
title_sort | multiparametric mr radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35931979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hejinlong multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT renjialiang multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT niuguangming multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT liuaishi multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT wuqiong multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT xieshenghui multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT maxueying multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT libo multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT wangpeng multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT shenjing multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT wujianlin multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus AT gaoyang multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus |