Cargando…

Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status

BACKGROUND: Genotype status of glioma have important significance to clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there are few studies on the prediction of multiple genotype status in glioma by method of multi-sequence radiomics. The purpose of the study is to compare the performance of clinical f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Jinlong, Ren, Jialiang, Niu, Guangming, Liu, Aishi, Wu, Qiong, Xie, Shenghui, Ma, Xueying, Li, Bo, Wang, Peng, Shen, Jing, Wu, Jianlin, Gao, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35931979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8
_version_ 1784763053632389120
author He, Jinlong
Ren, Jialiang
Niu, Guangming
Liu, Aishi
Wu, Qiong
Xie, Shenghui
Ma, Xueying
Li, Bo
Wang, Peng
Shen, Jing
Wu, Jianlin
Gao, Yang
author_facet He, Jinlong
Ren, Jialiang
Niu, Guangming
Liu, Aishi
Wu, Qiong
Xie, Shenghui
Ma, Xueying
Li, Bo
Wang, Peng
Shen, Jing
Wu, Jianlin
Gao, Yang
author_sort He, Jinlong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genotype status of glioma have important significance to clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there are few studies on the prediction of multiple genotype status in glioma by method of multi-sequence radiomics. The purpose of the study is to compare the performance of clinical features (age, sex, WHO grade, MRI morphological features etc.), radiomics features from multi MR sequence (T2WI, T1WI, DWI, ADC, CE-MRI (contrast enhancement)), and a combined multiple features model in predicting biomarker status (IDH, MGMT, TERT, 1p/19q of glioma. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 81 glioma patients confirmed by histology were enrolled in this study. Five MRI sequences were used for radiomic feature extraction. Finally, 107 features were extracted from each sequence on Pyradiomics software, separately. These included 18 first-order metrics, such as the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis etc., 14 shape features and second-order metrics including 24 grey level run length matrix (GLCM), 16 grey level run length matrix (GLRLM), 16 grey level size zone matrix (GLSZM), 5 neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), and 14 grey level dependence matrix (GLDM). Then, Univariate analysis and LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model were used to data dimension reduction, feature selection, and radiomics signature building. Significant features (p < 0.05 by multivariate logistic regression were retained to establish clinical model, T1WI model, T2WI model, T1 + C (T1WI contrast enhancement model, DWI model and ADC model, multi sequence model. Clinical features were combined with multi sequence model to establish a combined model. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: The combined model showed the better performance in some groups of genotype status among some models (IDH AUC = 0.93, MGMT AUC = 0.88, TERT AUC = 0.76). Multi sequence model performed better than single sequence model in IDH, MGMT, TERT. There was no significant difference among the models in predicting 1p/19q status. Decision curve analysis showed combined model has higher clinical benefit than multi sequence model. CONCLUSION: Multi sequence model is an effective method to identify the genotype status of cerebral glioma. Combined with clinical models can better distinguish genotype status of glioma. KEY POINTS: The combined model showed the higher performance compare with other models in predicting genotype status of IDH, MGMT, TERT. Multi sequence model showed a better predictive model than that of a single sequence model. Compared with other models, the combined model and multi sequence model show no advantage in prediction of 1p/19q status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9354364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93543642022-08-06 Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status He, Jinlong Ren, Jialiang Niu, Guangming Liu, Aishi Wu, Qiong Xie, Shenghui Ma, Xueying Li, Bo Wang, Peng Shen, Jing Wu, Jianlin Gao, Yang BMC Med Imaging Research BACKGROUND: Genotype status of glioma have important significance to clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there are few studies on the prediction of multiple genotype status in glioma by method of multi-sequence radiomics. The purpose of the study is to compare the performance of clinical features (age, sex, WHO grade, MRI morphological features etc.), radiomics features from multi MR sequence (T2WI, T1WI, DWI, ADC, CE-MRI (contrast enhancement)), and a combined multiple features model in predicting biomarker status (IDH, MGMT, TERT, 1p/19q of glioma. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 81 glioma patients confirmed by histology were enrolled in this study. Five MRI sequences were used for radiomic feature extraction. Finally, 107 features were extracted from each sequence on Pyradiomics software, separately. These included 18 first-order metrics, such as the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis etc., 14 shape features and second-order metrics including 24 grey level run length matrix (GLCM), 16 grey level run length matrix (GLRLM), 16 grey level size zone matrix (GLSZM), 5 neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), and 14 grey level dependence matrix (GLDM). Then, Univariate analysis and LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model were used to data dimension reduction, feature selection, and radiomics signature building. Significant features (p < 0.05 by multivariate logistic regression were retained to establish clinical model, T1WI model, T2WI model, T1 + C (T1WI contrast enhancement model, DWI model and ADC model, multi sequence model. Clinical features were combined with multi sequence model to establish a combined model. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: The combined model showed the better performance in some groups of genotype status among some models (IDH AUC = 0.93, MGMT AUC = 0.88, TERT AUC = 0.76). Multi sequence model performed better than single sequence model in IDH, MGMT, TERT. There was no significant difference among the models in predicting 1p/19q status. Decision curve analysis showed combined model has higher clinical benefit than multi sequence model. CONCLUSION: Multi sequence model is an effective method to identify the genotype status of cerebral glioma. Combined with clinical models can better distinguish genotype status of glioma. KEY POINTS: The combined model showed the higher performance compare with other models in predicting genotype status of IDH, MGMT, TERT. Multi sequence model showed a better predictive model than that of a single sequence model. Compared with other models, the combined model and multi sequence model show no advantage in prediction of 1p/19q status. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8. BioMed Central 2022-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9354364/ /pubmed/35931979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
He, Jinlong
Ren, Jialiang
Niu, Guangming
Liu, Aishi
Wu, Qiong
Xie, Shenghui
Ma, Xueying
Li, Bo
Wang, Peng
Shen, Jing
Wu, Jianlin
Gao, Yang
Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
title Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
title_full Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
title_fullStr Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
title_short Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
title_sort multiparametric mr radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35931979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00865-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hejinlong multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT renjialiang multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT niuguangming multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT liuaishi multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT wuqiong multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT xieshenghui multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT maxueying multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT libo multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT wangpeng multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT shenjing multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT wujianlin multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus
AT gaoyang multiparametricmrradiomicsinbraingliomamodelscomparationtopredictbiomarkerstatus