Cargando…

Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of migraine is mainly clinical and self-reported, which makes additional examinations unnecessary in most cases. Migraine can be subtyped into chronic (CM) and episodic (EM). Despite the very high prevalence of migraine, there are no evidence-based guidelines for differenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomez-Pilar, Javier, Martínez-Cagigal, Víctor, García-Azorín, David, Gómez, Carlos, Guerrero, Ángel, Hornero, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01465-1
_version_ 1784763055139192832
author Gomez-Pilar, Javier
Martínez-Cagigal, Víctor
García-Azorín, David
Gómez, Carlos
Guerrero, Ángel
Hornero, Roberto
author_facet Gomez-Pilar, Javier
Martínez-Cagigal, Víctor
García-Azorín, David
Gómez, Carlos
Guerrero, Ángel
Hornero, Roberto
author_sort Gomez-Pilar, Javier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of migraine is mainly clinical and self-reported, which makes additional examinations unnecessary in most cases. Migraine can be subtyped into chronic (CM) and episodic (EM). Despite the very high prevalence of migraine, there are no evidence-based guidelines for differentiating between these subtypes other than the number of days of migraine headache per month. Thus, we consider it timely to perform a systematic review to search for physiological evidence from functional activity (as opposed to anatomical structure) for the differentiation between CM and EM, as well as potential functional biomarkers. For this purpose, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and PubMed databases were screened. FINDINGS: Among the 24 studies included in this review, most of them (22) reported statistically significant differences between the groups of CM and EM. This finding is consistent regardless of brain activity acquisition modality, ictal stage, and recording condition for a wide variety of analyses. That speaks for a supramodal and domain-general differences between CM and EM that goes beyond a differentiation based on the days of migraine per month. Together, the reviewed studies demonstrates that electro- and magneto-physiological brain activity (M/EEG), as well as neurovascular and metabolic recordings from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), show characteristic patterns that allow to differentiate between CM and EM groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although a clear brain activity-based biomarker has not yet been identified to distinguish these subtypes of migraine, research is approaching headache specialists to a migraine diagnosis based not only on symptoms and signs reported by patients. Future studies based on M/EEG should pay special attention to the brain activity in medium and fast frequency bands, mainly the beta band. On the other hand, fMRI and PET studies should focus on neural circuits and regions related to pain and emotional processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9354370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93543702022-08-06 Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review Gomez-Pilar, Javier Martínez-Cagigal, Víctor García-Azorín, David Gómez, Carlos Guerrero, Ángel Hornero, Roberto J Headache Pain Review BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of migraine is mainly clinical and self-reported, which makes additional examinations unnecessary in most cases. Migraine can be subtyped into chronic (CM) and episodic (EM). Despite the very high prevalence of migraine, there are no evidence-based guidelines for differentiating between these subtypes other than the number of days of migraine headache per month. Thus, we consider it timely to perform a systematic review to search for physiological evidence from functional activity (as opposed to anatomical structure) for the differentiation between CM and EM, as well as potential functional biomarkers. For this purpose, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and PubMed databases were screened. FINDINGS: Among the 24 studies included in this review, most of them (22) reported statistically significant differences between the groups of CM and EM. This finding is consistent regardless of brain activity acquisition modality, ictal stage, and recording condition for a wide variety of analyses. That speaks for a supramodal and domain-general differences between CM and EM that goes beyond a differentiation based on the days of migraine per month. Together, the reviewed studies demonstrates that electro- and magneto-physiological brain activity (M/EEG), as well as neurovascular and metabolic recordings from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), show characteristic patterns that allow to differentiate between CM and EM groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although a clear brain activity-based biomarker has not yet been identified to distinguish these subtypes of migraine, research is approaching headache specialists to a migraine diagnosis based not only on symptoms and signs reported by patients. Future studies based on M/EEG should pay special attention to the brain activity in medium and fast frequency bands, mainly the beta band. On the other hand, fMRI and PET studies should focus on neural circuits and regions related to pain and emotional processing. Springer Milan 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9354370/ /pubmed/35927625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01465-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Gomez-Pilar, Javier
Martínez-Cagigal, Víctor
García-Azorín, David
Gómez, Carlos
Guerrero, Ángel
Hornero, Roberto
Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review
title Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review
title_full Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review
title_fullStr Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review
title_short Headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by EEG, MRI, PET as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: Evidence from a systematic review
title_sort headache-related circuits and high frequencies evaluated by eeg, mri, pet as potential biomarkers to differentiate chronic and episodic migraine: evidence from a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35927625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01465-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezpilarjavier headacherelatedcircuitsandhighfrequenciesevaluatedbyeegmripetaspotentialbiomarkerstodifferentiatechronicandepisodicmigraineevidencefromasystematicreview
AT martinezcagigalvictor headacherelatedcircuitsandhighfrequenciesevaluatedbyeegmripetaspotentialbiomarkerstodifferentiatechronicandepisodicmigraineevidencefromasystematicreview
AT garciaazorindavid headacherelatedcircuitsandhighfrequenciesevaluatedbyeegmripetaspotentialbiomarkerstodifferentiatechronicandepisodicmigraineevidencefromasystematicreview
AT gomezcarlos headacherelatedcircuitsandhighfrequenciesevaluatedbyeegmripetaspotentialbiomarkerstodifferentiatechronicandepisodicmigraineevidencefromasystematicreview
AT guerreroangel headacherelatedcircuitsandhighfrequenciesevaluatedbyeegmripetaspotentialbiomarkerstodifferentiatechronicandepisodicmigraineevidencefromasystematicreview
AT horneroroberto headacherelatedcircuitsandhighfrequenciesevaluatedbyeegmripetaspotentialbiomarkerstodifferentiatechronicandepisodicmigraineevidencefromasystematicreview