Cargando…

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cigarette smoking in China is high and the utilization of smoking cessation clinics is very low. Multicomponent smoking cessation interventions involving community and hospital collaboration have the potential to increase the smoking cessation rate. However, the cost-ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Tingting, Jin, Qianying, Li, Xingming, Bai, Xinyuan, Qiao, Kun, Gu, Mingyu, Wang, Yao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.853438
_version_ 1784763096302092288
author Qin, Tingting
Jin, Qianying
Li, Xingming
Bai, Xinyuan
Qiao, Kun
Gu, Mingyu
Wang, Yao
author_facet Qin, Tingting
Jin, Qianying
Li, Xingming
Bai, Xinyuan
Qiao, Kun
Gu, Mingyu
Wang, Yao
author_sort Qin, Tingting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cigarette smoking in China is high and the utilization of smoking cessation clinics is very low. Multicomponent smoking cessation interventions involving community and hospital collaboration have the potential to increase the smoking cessation rate. However, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention model is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a smoking cessation intervention trial in 19 community health service centers in Beijing, China. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a societal perspective to compare three strategies of smoking cessation: no intervention (NI), pharmacological intervention (PI), and comprehensive intervention (CI) (PI plus online health promotion). A Markov model, with a time horizon of 20 years, was used to simulate the natural progression of estimated 10,000 male smokers. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to obtain data on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by using the five-level EuroQol-5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore parameters of uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: A total of 680 participants were included in this study, including 283 in the PI group and 397 in the CI group. After 6 months of follow-up, the smoking cessation rate reached 30.0% in the CI group and 21.2% in the PI group. Using the Markov model, compared with the NI group, the intervention strategies of the PI group and the CI group were found to be cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $535.62/QALY and $366.19/QALY, respectively. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the CI strategy was always the most cost-effective intervention. CONCLUSION: CI for smoking cessation, based in hospital and community in China, is more cost-effective than PI alone. Therefore, this smoking cessation model should be considered to be implemented in healthcare settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9354545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93545452022-08-06 A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration Qin, Tingting Jin, Qianying Li, Xingming Bai, Xinyuan Qiao, Kun Gu, Mingyu Wang, Yao Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cigarette smoking in China is high and the utilization of smoking cessation clinics is very low. Multicomponent smoking cessation interventions involving community and hospital collaboration have the potential to increase the smoking cessation rate. However, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention model is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a smoking cessation intervention trial in 19 community health service centers in Beijing, China. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from a societal perspective to compare three strategies of smoking cessation: no intervention (NI), pharmacological intervention (PI), and comprehensive intervention (CI) (PI plus online health promotion). A Markov model, with a time horizon of 20 years, was used to simulate the natural progression of estimated 10,000 male smokers. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to obtain data on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by using the five-level EuroQol-5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to explore parameters of uncertainty in the model. RESULTS: A total of 680 participants were included in this study, including 283 in the PI group and 397 in the CI group. After 6 months of follow-up, the smoking cessation rate reached 30.0% in the CI group and 21.2% in the PI group. Using the Markov model, compared with the NI group, the intervention strategies of the PI group and the CI group were found to be cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $535.62/QALY and $366.19/QALY, respectively. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the CI strategy was always the most cost-effective intervention. CONCLUSION: CI for smoking cessation, based in hospital and community in China, is more cost-effective than PI alone. Therefore, this smoking cessation model should be considered to be implemented in healthcare settings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9354545/ /pubmed/35937255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.853438 Text en Copyright © 2022 Qin, Jin, Li, Bai, Qiao, Gu and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Qin, Tingting
Jin, Qianying
Li, Xingming
Bai, Xinyuan
Qiao, Kun
Gu, Mingyu
Wang, Yao
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration
title A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration
title_full A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration
title_fullStr A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration
title_full_unstemmed A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration
title_short A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of comprehensive smoking-cessation interventions based on the community and hospital collaboration
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35937255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.853438
work_keys_str_mv AT qintingting acosteffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT jinqianying acosteffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT lixingming acosteffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT baixinyuan acosteffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT qiaokun acosteffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT gumingyu acosteffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT wangyao acosteffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT qintingting costeffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT jinqianying costeffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT lixingming costeffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT baixinyuan costeffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT qiaokun costeffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT gumingyu costeffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration
AT wangyao costeffectivenessanalysisofcomprehensivesmokingcessationinterventionsbasedonthecommunityandhospitalcollaboration