Cargando…

The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test

PURPOSE: To elucidate how aging would affect the extent of semantic context use and the reliance on semantic context measured with the Repeat–Recall Test (RRT). METHODS: A younger adult group (YA) aged between 18 and 25 and an older adult group (OA) aged between 50 and 65 were recruited. Participant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Jiayu, Zhang, Zhikai, Sun, Baoxuan, Liu, Haotian, Wei, Chaogang, Liu, Yuhe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35936762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.924193
_version_ 1784763156955922432
author Sun, Jiayu
Zhang, Zhikai
Sun, Baoxuan
Liu, Haotian
Wei, Chaogang
Liu, Yuhe
author_facet Sun, Jiayu
Zhang, Zhikai
Sun, Baoxuan
Liu, Haotian
Wei, Chaogang
Liu, Yuhe
author_sort Sun, Jiayu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To elucidate how aging would affect the extent of semantic context use and the reliance on semantic context measured with the Repeat–Recall Test (RRT). METHODS: A younger adult group (YA) aged between 18 and 25 and an older adult group (OA) aged between 50 and 65 were recruited. Participants from both the groups performed RRT: sentence repeat and delayed recall tasks, and subjective listening effort and noise tolerable time, under two noise types and seven signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Performance–Intensity curves were fitted. The performance in SRT50 and SRT75 was predicted. RESULTS: For the repeat task, the OA group used more semantic context and relied more on semantic context than the YA group. For the recall task, OA used less semantic context but relied more on context than the YA group. Age did not affect the subjective listening effort but significantly affected noise tolerable time. Participants in both age groups could use more context in SRT75 than SRT50 on four tasks of RRT. Under the same SRT, however, the YA group could use more context in repeat and recall tasks than the OA group. CONCLUSION: Age affected the use and reliance of semantic context. Even though the OA group used more context in speech recognition, they failed in speech information maintenance (recall) even with the help of semantic context. The OA group relied more on context while performing repeat and recall tasks. The amount of context used was also influenced by SRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9354826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93548262022-08-06 The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test Sun, Jiayu Zhang, Zhikai Sun, Baoxuan Liu, Haotian Wei, Chaogang Liu, Yuhe Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience PURPOSE: To elucidate how aging would affect the extent of semantic context use and the reliance on semantic context measured with the Repeat–Recall Test (RRT). METHODS: A younger adult group (YA) aged between 18 and 25 and an older adult group (OA) aged between 50 and 65 were recruited. Participants from both the groups performed RRT: sentence repeat and delayed recall tasks, and subjective listening effort and noise tolerable time, under two noise types and seven signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Performance–Intensity curves were fitted. The performance in SRT50 and SRT75 was predicted. RESULTS: For the repeat task, the OA group used more semantic context and relied more on semantic context than the YA group. For the recall task, OA used less semantic context but relied more on context than the YA group. Age did not affect the subjective listening effort but significantly affected noise tolerable time. Participants in both age groups could use more context in SRT75 than SRT50 on four tasks of RRT. Under the same SRT, however, the YA group could use more context in repeat and recall tasks than the OA group. CONCLUSION: Age affected the use and reliance of semantic context. Even though the OA group used more context in speech recognition, they failed in speech information maintenance (recall) even with the help of semantic context. The OA group relied more on context while performing repeat and recall tasks. The amount of context used was also influenced by SRT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9354826/ /pubmed/35936762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.924193 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Zhang, Sun, Liu, Wei and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sun, Jiayu
Zhang, Zhikai
Sun, Baoxuan
Liu, Haotian
Wei, Chaogang
Liu, Yuhe
The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test
title The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test
title_full The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test
title_fullStr The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test
title_full_unstemmed The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test
title_short The effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: A behavioral experiment with Repeat–Recall Test
title_sort effect of aging on context use and reliance on context in speech: a behavioral experiment with repeat–recall test
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9354826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35936762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.924193
work_keys_str_mv AT sunjiayu theeffectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT zhangzhikai theeffectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT sunbaoxuan theeffectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT liuhaotian theeffectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT weichaogang theeffectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT liuyuhe theeffectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT sunjiayu effectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT zhangzhikai effectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT sunbaoxuan effectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT liuhaotian effectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT weichaogang effectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest
AT liuyuhe effectofagingoncontextuseandrelianceoncontextinspeechabehavioralexperimentwithrepeatrecalltest