Cargando…

Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems

Bacteria have adaptive immunity against viruses (phages) in the form of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Currently, 6 types of CRISPR-Cas systems are known and the molecular study of three of these has revealed important molecular differences. It is unknown if and how these molecular differences change th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chabas, Hélène, Müller, Viktor, Bonhoeffer, Sebastian, Regoes, Roland R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010329
_version_ 1784763244776259584
author Chabas, Hélène
Müller, Viktor
Bonhoeffer, Sebastian
Regoes, Roland R.
author_facet Chabas, Hélène
Müller, Viktor
Bonhoeffer, Sebastian
Regoes, Roland R.
author_sort Chabas, Hélène
collection PubMed
description Bacteria have adaptive immunity against viruses (phages) in the form of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Currently, 6 types of CRISPR-Cas systems are known and the molecular study of three of these has revealed important molecular differences. It is unknown if and how these molecular differences change the outcome of phage infection and the evolutionary pressure the CRISPR-Cas systems faces. To determine the importance of these molecular differences, we model a phage outbreak entering a population defending exclusively with a type I/II or a type III CRISPR-Cas system. We show that for type III CRISPR-Cas systems, rapid phage extinction is driven by the probability to acquire at least one resistance spacer. However, for type I/II CRISPR-Cas systems, rapid phage extinction is characterized by an a threshold-like behaviour: any acquisition probability below this threshold leads to phage survival whereas any acquisition probability above it, results in phage extinction. We also show that in the absence of autoimmunity, high acquisition rates evolve. However, when CRISPR-Cas systems are prone to autoimmunity, intermediate levels of acquisition are optimal during a phage outbreak. As we predict an optimal probability of spacer acquisition 2 factors of magnitude above the one that has been measured, we discuss the origin of such a discrepancy. Finally, we show that in a biologically relevant parameter range, a type III CRISPR-Cas system can outcompete a type I/II CRISPR-Cas system with a slightly higher probability of acquisition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9355216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93552162022-08-06 Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems Chabas, Hélène Müller, Viktor Bonhoeffer, Sebastian Regoes, Roland R. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Bacteria have adaptive immunity against viruses (phages) in the form of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. Currently, 6 types of CRISPR-Cas systems are known and the molecular study of three of these has revealed important molecular differences. It is unknown if and how these molecular differences change the outcome of phage infection and the evolutionary pressure the CRISPR-Cas systems faces. To determine the importance of these molecular differences, we model a phage outbreak entering a population defending exclusively with a type I/II or a type III CRISPR-Cas system. We show that for type III CRISPR-Cas systems, rapid phage extinction is driven by the probability to acquire at least one resistance spacer. However, for type I/II CRISPR-Cas systems, rapid phage extinction is characterized by an a threshold-like behaviour: any acquisition probability below this threshold leads to phage survival whereas any acquisition probability above it, results in phage extinction. We also show that in the absence of autoimmunity, high acquisition rates evolve. However, when CRISPR-Cas systems are prone to autoimmunity, intermediate levels of acquisition are optimal during a phage outbreak. As we predict an optimal probability of spacer acquisition 2 factors of magnitude above the one that has been measured, we discuss the origin of such a discrepancy. Finally, we show that in a biologically relevant parameter range, a type III CRISPR-Cas system can outcompete a type I/II CRISPR-Cas system with a slightly higher probability of acquisition. Public Library of Science 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9355216/ /pubmed/35881633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010329 Text en © 2022 Chabas et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chabas, Hélène
Müller, Viktor
Bonhoeffer, Sebastian
Regoes, Roland R.
Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems
title Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems
title_full Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems
title_fullStr Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems
title_short Epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of CRISPR-Cas systems
title_sort epidemiological and evolutionary consequences of different types of crispr-cas systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010329
work_keys_str_mv AT chabashelene epidemiologicalandevolutionaryconsequencesofdifferenttypesofcrisprcassystems
AT mullerviktor epidemiologicalandevolutionaryconsequencesofdifferenttypesofcrisprcassystems
AT bonhoeffersebastian epidemiologicalandevolutionaryconsequencesofdifferenttypesofcrisprcassystems
AT regoesrolandr epidemiologicalandevolutionaryconsequencesofdifferenttypesofcrisprcassystems