Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of 77 TESE treatment cycles in non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome patients

OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to present the clinical outcomes of 76 azoospermic patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome (KS), treated with testicular spermatozoa extraction (TESE) followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using either fresh or cryopreserved testicular spermatoz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barros, Pedro, Cunha, Mariana, Barros, Alberto, Sousa, Mário, Dória, Sofia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34751018
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20210081
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to present the clinical outcomes of 76 azoospermic patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome (KS), treated with testicular spermatozoa extraction (TESE) followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using either fresh or cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients with non-mosaic KS belonging to a special group of cases that besides infertility did not present the classical signs and symptoms of testosterone deficiency. One of the patients repeated the TESE procedure (76 patients, 77 TESE cycles). Sixty of these 76 patients accepted to undergo TESE associated with ovarian stimulation, while 16 patients underwent TESE followed by testicular spermatozoa cryopreservation. Aneuploidy screening of the offspring was performed by Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and by amniotic fluid karyotyping. Statistical analysis used the Chi-Squared Test, Fisher's Exact Test, 2-sided, for rates, and the Independent Samples T-test for equality of means, 2-sided. RESULTS: Testicular spermatozoa were recovered in 31 (40.3%) of the attempts. The patients underwent 47 ICSI cycles, 25 with fresh testicular spermatozoa and 22 with cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa. Fertilization (63.5% vs. 41.6%, p=0.000), implantation (37% vs. 13.2%, p=0.014), clinical pregnancy (60.9% vs. 19%, p=0.005) and live birth (65.2% vs. 23.8%, p=0.006) rates were higher with fresh testicular spermatozoa. Chromosome analysis of the 21 newborns was normal. CONCLUSIONS: The present data adds further information regarding the recovery rate of spermatozoa after TESE and the embryological and clinical outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa, besides reassuring the safety concerning chromosomal transmission of KS from parents to their offspring.