Cargando…
Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in different gallbladder pathologic conditions. METHODS: All patients who underwent SPLC in our department between October 1, 2017 and March...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967963 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00020 |
_version_ | 1784763376105160704 |
---|---|
author | Casaccia, Marco Ponzano, Marta Testa, Tommaso Martigli, Sofia Paola Contratto, Cecilia De Cian, Franco |
author_facet | Casaccia, Marco Ponzano, Marta Testa, Tommaso Martigli, Sofia Paola Contratto, Cecilia De Cian, Franco |
author_sort | Casaccia, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in different gallbladder pathologic conditions. METHODS: All patients who underwent SPLC in our department between October 1, 2017 and March 31, 2020 were registered consecutively in a prospective database. Patients’ charts were retrospectively divided according to histological diagnosis: normal gallbladder (NG) (n = 13), chronic cholecystitis (CC) (n =47), and acute cholecystitis (AC) (n = 10). The parameters for assessing the procedure outcome included operative time, blood loss, use of additional trocars, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Patient groups were statistically compared. RESULTS: Seventy patients underwent SPLC. Duration of surgery increased from NG (55 ± 22.7 min) to CC (70 ± 33.5 min), and to AC patients (110.5 ± 50.5 min), which is statistically significant (P = .001). Postoperative complication rates were 7.6% in NG patients, 17% in CC, and 30% in AC (P = .442). Length of hospitalization was shorter for NG patients (1.0 ± 0.6 days) versus CC (2.0 ± 1.1 days) and AC patients (2.0 ± 4.7 days), with statistical significance (P = .020). Multivariate analysis found that pathology type and the occurrence of postoperative complications were independent predictors for prolonged operative times and prolonged hospital stay, respectively. CONCLUSION: SPLC is feasible for acute and chronic cholecystitis with good procedural outcomes. Since SPLC technique itself can be sometimes challenging with the existing technology, its application, especially in cases of acute cholecystitis, should be done with caution. Only prospective randomized studies on this approach for acute and chronic gallbladder diseases will assess the complete reliability of this technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9355797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93557972022-08-12 Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis Casaccia, Marco Ponzano, Marta Testa, Tommaso Martigli, Sofia Paola Contratto, Cecilia De Cian, Franco JSLS Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in different gallbladder pathologic conditions. METHODS: All patients who underwent SPLC in our department between October 1, 2017 and March 31, 2020 were registered consecutively in a prospective database. Patients’ charts were retrospectively divided according to histological diagnosis: normal gallbladder (NG) (n = 13), chronic cholecystitis (CC) (n =47), and acute cholecystitis (AC) (n = 10). The parameters for assessing the procedure outcome included operative time, blood loss, use of additional trocars, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Patient groups were statistically compared. RESULTS: Seventy patients underwent SPLC. Duration of surgery increased from NG (55 ± 22.7 min) to CC (70 ± 33.5 min), and to AC patients (110.5 ± 50.5 min), which is statistically significant (P = .001). Postoperative complication rates were 7.6% in NG patients, 17% in CC, and 30% in AC (P = .442). Length of hospitalization was shorter for NG patients (1.0 ± 0.6 days) versus CC (2.0 ± 1.1 days) and AC patients (2.0 ± 4.7 days), with statistical significance (P = .020). Multivariate analysis found that pathology type and the occurrence of postoperative complications were independent predictors for prolonged operative times and prolonged hospital stay, respectively. CONCLUSION: SPLC is feasible for acute and chronic cholecystitis with good procedural outcomes. Since SPLC technique itself can be sometimes challenging with the existing technology, its application, especially in cases of acute cholecystitis, should be done with caution. Only prospective randomized studies on this approach for acute and chronic gallbladder diseases will assess the complete reliability of this technique. The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9355797/ /pubmed/35967963 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00020 Text en © 2022 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/) ), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Casaccia, Marco Ponzano, Marta Testa, Tommaso Martigli, Sofia Paola Contratto, Cecilia De Cian, Franco Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis |
title | Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis |
title_full | Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis |
title_fullStr | Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis |
title_short | Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis |
title_sort | single-port cholecystectomy for cholecystitis versus non-cholecystitis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967963 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT casacciamarco singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis AT ponzanomarta singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis AT testatommaso singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis AT martiglisofiapaola singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis AT contrattocecilia singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis AT decianfranco singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis |