Cargando…

Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in different gallbladder pathologic conditions. METHODS: All patients who underwent SPLC in our department between October 1, 2017 and March...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casaccia, Marco, Ponzano, Marta, Testa, Tommaso, Martigli, Sofia Paola, Contratto, Cecilia, De Cian, Franco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967963
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00020
_version_ 1784763376105160704
author Casaccia, Marco
Ponzano, Marta
Testa, Tommaso
Martigli, Sofia Paola
Contratto, Cecilia
De Cian, Franco
author_facet Casaccia, Marco
Ponzano, Marta
Testa, Tommaso
Martigli, Sofia Paola
Contratto, Cecilia
De Cian, Franco
author_sort Casaccia, Marco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in different gallbladder pathologic conditions. METHODS: All patients who underwent SPLC in our department between October 1, 2017 and March 31, 2020 were registered consecutively in a prospective database. Patients’ charts were retrospectively divided according to histological diagnosis: normal gallbladder (NG) (n = 13), chronic cholecystitis (CC) (n =47), and acute cholecystitis (AC) (n = 10). The parameters for assessing the procedure outcome included operative time, blood loss, use of additional trocars, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Patient groups were statistically compared. RESULTS: Seventy patients underwent SPLC. Duration of surgery increased from NG (55 ± 22.7 min) to CC (70 ± 33.5 min), and to AC patients (110.5 ± 50.5 min), which is statistically significant (P = .001). Postoperative complication rates were 7.6% in NG patients, 17% in CC, and 30% in AC (P = .442). Length of hospitalization was shorter for NG patients (1.0 ± 0.6 days) versus CC (2.0 ± 1.1 days) and AC patients (2.0 ± 4.7 days), with statistical significance (P = .020). Multivariate analysis found that pathology type and the occurrence of postoperative complications were independent predictors for prolonged operative times and prolonged hospital stay, respectively. CONCLUSION: SPLC is feasible for acute and chronic cholecystitis with good procedural outcomes. Since SPLC technique itself can be sometimes challenging with the existing technology, its application, especially in cases of acute cholecystitis, should be done with caution. Only prospective randomized studies on this approach for acute and chronic gallbladder diseases will assess the complete reliability of this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9355797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93557972022-08-12 Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis Casaccia, Marco Ponzano, Marta Testa, Tommaso Martigli, Sofia Paola Contratto, Cecilia De Cian, Franco JSLS Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis in different gallbladder pathologic conditions. METHODS: All patients who underwent SPLC in our department between October 1, 2017 and March 31, 2020 were registered consecutively in a prospective database. Patients’ charts were retrospectively divided according to histological diagnosis: normal gallbladder (NG) (n = 13), chronic cholecystitis (CC) (n =47), and acute cholecystitis (AC) (n = 10). The parameters for assessing the procedure outcome included operative time, blood loss, use of additional trocars, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Patient groups were statistically compared. RESULTS: Seventy patients underwent SPLC. Duration of surgery increased from NG (55 ± 22.7 min) to CC (70 ± 33.5 min), and to AC patients (110.5 ± 50.5 min), which is statistically significant (P = .001). Postoperative complication rates were 7.6% in NG patients, 17% in CC, and 30% in AC (P = .442). Length of hospitalization was shorter for NG patients (1.0 ± 0.6 days) versus CC (2.0 ± 1.1 days) and AC patients (2.0 ± 4.7 days), with statistical significance (P = .020). Multivariate analysis found that pathology type and the occurrence of postoperative complications were independent predictors for prolonged operative times and prolonged hospital stay, respectively. CONCLUSION: SPLC is feasible for acute and chronic cholecystitis with good procedural outcomes. Since SPLC technique itself can be sometimes challenging with the existing technology, its application, especially in cases of acute cholecystitis, should be done with caution. Only prospective randomized studies on this approach for acute and chronic gallbladder diseases will assess the complete reliability of this technique. The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9355797/ /pubmed/35967963 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00020 Text en © 2022 by SLS, Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/) ), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Research Article
Casaccia, Marco
Ponzano, Marta
Testa, Tommaso
Martigli, Sofia Paola
Contratto, Cecilia
De Cian, Franco
Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis
title Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis
title_full Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis
title_fullStr Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis
title_full_unstemmed Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis
title_short Single-Port Cholecystectomy for Cholecystitis Versus Non-Cholecystitis
title_sort single-port cholecystectomy for cholecystitis versus non-cholecystitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35967963
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00020
work_keys_str_mv AT casacciamarco singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis
AT ponzanomarta singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis
AT testatommaso singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis
AT martiglisofiapaola singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis
AT contrattocecilia singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis
AT decianfranco singleportcholecystectomyforcholecystitisversusnoncholecystitis