Cargando…
The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of standardized objective and reliable assessment tools for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) imaging offers a non-invasive method to identify peripheral neuropathy markers, namely Meissner’s corpuscles (MC)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac106 |
_version_ | 1784763381004107776 |
---|---|
author | Ramnarine, Sabrina R Dougherty, Patrick M Rolke, Roman Williams, Linda J Alessi-Fox, Christi Coleman, Andrew J Longo, Caterina Colvin, Lesley A Fallon, Marie T |
author_facet | Ramnarine, Sabrina R Dougherty, Patrick M Rolke, Roman Williams, Linda J Alessi-Fox, Christi Coleman, Andrew J Longo, Caterina Colvin, Lesley A Fallon, Marie T |
author_sort | Ramnarine, Sabrina R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a lack of standardized objective and reliable assessment tools for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) imaging offers a non-invasive method to identify peripheral neuropathy markers, namely Meissner’s corpuscles (MC). This study investigated the feasibility and value of RCM in CIPN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Reflectance confocal microscopy was performed on the fingertip to evaluate MC density in 45 healthy controls and 9 patients with cancer (prior, during, and post-chemotherapy). Quantification was completed by 2 reviewers (one blinded), with maximum MC count/3 × 3 mm image reported. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST; thermal and mechanical detection thresholds), Grooved pegboard test, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS) were conducted for comparison. RESULTS: In controls (25 females, 20 males; 24-81 years), females exhibited greater mean MC density compared with males (49.9 ± 7.1 vs 30.9 ± 4.2 MC/3 × 3 mm; P = .03). Differences existed across age by decade (P < .0001). Meissner’s corpuscle density was correlated with mechanical detection (ρ = −0.51), warm detection (ρ = −0.47), cold pain (ρ = 0.49) thresholds (P < .01); and completion time on the Grooved pegboard test in both hands (P ≤ .02). At baseline, patients had reduced MC density vs age and gender-matched controls (P = .03). Longitudinal assessment of MC density revealed significant relationships with QST and PROMS. Inter-rater reliability of MC count showed an intraclass correlation of 0.96 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the clinical utility of RCM in CIPN as it provides meaningful markers of sensory nerve dysfunction. Novel, prospective assessment demonstrated the ability to detect subclinical deficits in patients at risk of CIPN and potential to monitor neuropathy progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9355818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93558182022-08-09 The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study Ramnarine, Sabrina R Dougherty, Patrick M Rolke, Roman Williams, Linda J Alessi-Fox, Christi Coleman, Andrew J Longo, Caterina Colvin, Lesley A Fallon, Marie T Oncologist Symptom Management and Supportive Care BACKGROUND: There is a lack of standardized objective and reliable assessment tools for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) imaging offers a non-invasive method to identify peripheral neuropathy markers, namely Meissner’s corpuscles (MC). This study investigated the feasibility and value of RCM in CIPN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Reflectance confocal microscopy was performed on the fingertip to evaluate MC density in 45 healthy controls and 9 patients with cancer (prior, during, and post-chemotherapy). Quantification was completed by 2 reviewers (one blinded), with maximum MC count/3 × 3 mm image reported. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST; thermal and mechanical detection thresholds), Grooved pegboard test, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMS) were conducted for comparison. RESULTS: In controls (25 females, 20 males; 24-81 years), females exhibited greater mean MC density compared with males (49.9 ± 7.1 vs 30.9 ± 4.2 MC/3 × 3 mm; P = .03). Differences existed across age by decade (P < .0001). Meissner’s corpuscle density was correlated with mechanical detection (ρ = −0.51), warm detection (ρ = −0.47), cold pain (ρ = 0.49) thresholds (P < .01); and completion time on the Grooved pegboard test in both hands (P ≤ .02). At baseline, patients had reduced MC density vs age and gender-matched controls (P = .03). Longitudinal assessment of MC density revealed significant relationships with QST and PROMS. Inter-rater reliability of MC count showed an intraclass correlation of 0.96 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the clinical utility of RCM in CIPN as it provides meaningful markers of sensory nerve dysfunction. Novel, prospective assessment demonstrated the ability to detect subclinical deficits in patients at risk of CIPN and potential to monitor neuropathy progression. Oxford University Press 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9355818/ /pubmed/35706109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac106 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Symptom Management and Supportive Care Ramnarine, Sabrina R Dougherty, Patrick M Rolke, Roman Williams, Linda J Alessi-Fox, Christi Coleman, Andrew J Longo, Caterina Colvin, Lesley A Fallon, Marie T The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study |
title | The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study |
title_full | The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study |
title_short | The Value of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy as an Assessment Tool in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | value of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy as an assessment tool in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a pilot study |
topic | Symptom Management and Supportive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramnarinesabrinar thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT doughertypatrickm thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT rolkeroman thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT williamslindaj thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT alessifoxchristi thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT colemanandrewj thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT longocaterina thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT colvinlesleya thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT fallonmariet thevalueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT ramnarinesabrinar valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT doughertypatrickm valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT rolkeroman valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT williamslindaj valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT alessifoxchristi valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT colemanandrewj valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT longocaterina valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT colvinlesleya valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy AT fallonmariet valueofinvivoreflectanceconfocalmicroscopyasanassessmenttoolinchemotherapyinducedperipheralneuropathyapilotstudy |