Cargando…

Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching

Objectives : The aim of the present study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index and enamel cracks in bonding and rebonding of brackets to enamel, conditioned with erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser and conventional acid-etching. Material s and Methods: Fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soltanmohamadi Borujeni, Elahe, Chalipa, Javad, Etemadi, Ardavan, Nasiri, Maryam, Kharrazifard, Mohammad Javad, Akhoundi, Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355859/
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v18i14.6139
_version_ 1784763389546856448
author Soltanmohamadi Borujeni, Elahe
Chalipa, Javad
Etemadi, Ardavan
Nasiri, Maryam
Kharrazifard, Mohammad Javad
Akhoundi, Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad
author_facet Soltanmohamadi Borujeni, Elahe
Chalipa, Javad
Etemadi, Ardavan
Nasiri, Maryam
Kharrazifard, Mohammad Javad
Akhoundi, Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad
author_sort Soltanmohamadi Borujeni, Elahe
collection PubMed
description Objectives : The aim of the present study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index and enamel cracks in bonding and rebonding of brackets to enamel, conditioned with erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser and conventional acid-etching. Material s and Methods: Fifty-two bovine lower incisors were randomly divided into four groups consisting of group 1 (acid-conditioning in both bondings), group 2 (acid-conditioning in first and laser-conditioning in second bonding), group 3 (laser-conditioning in first- and acid-conditioning in second bonding), and group 4 (laser-conditioning in both bondings). After bracket placement, the samples were thermocycled and tested for SBS in both bonding procedures. Adhesive remnant index scores and enamel cracks were also determined. Tukey's test and one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis (P<0.05). Results: Mean SBS in the first bonding was 23.59MPa in groups 1 and 2, and 6.9MPa in groups 3 and 4. (P<0.001). The acid-etched teeth had a significantly lower SBS in rebonding, regardless of the reconditioning method (P<0.001). The SBS of the teeth conditioned with Er:YAG laser in the first bonding did not show significant changes in rebonding, although mean SBS was higher compared to the first bonding (P=0.675). Bonding most often failed at the enamel-adhesive interface and enamel cracks were observed in a few teeth. Conclusion: The method of primary enamel preparation can affect SBS in rebonding. Based on our results, the mean SBS of Er:YAG-conditioned groups was clinically acceptable in bonding and rebonding, although it was lower compared to the acid-etched samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9355859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93558592022-08-12 Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching Soltanmohamadi Borujeni, Elahe Chalipa, Javad Etemadi, Ardavan Nasiri, Maryam Kharrazifard, Mohammad Javad Akhoundi, Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad Front Dent Original Article Objectives : The aim of the present study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS), adhesive remnant index and enamel cracks in bonding and rebonding of brackets to enamel, conditioned with erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser and conventional acid-etching. Material s and Methods: Fifty-two bovine lower incisors were randomly divided into four groups consisting of group 1 (acid-conditioning in both bondings), group 2 (acid-conditioning in first and laser-conditioning in second bonding), group 3 (laser-conditioning in first- and acid-conditioning in second bonding), and group 4 (laser-conditioning in both bondings). After bracket placement, the samples were thermocycled and tested for SBS in both bonding procedures. Adhesive remnant index scores and enamel cracks were also determined. Tukey's test and one-way analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis (P<0.05). Results: Mean SBS in the first bonding was 23.59MPa in groups 1 and 2, and 6.9MPa in groups 3 and 4. (P<0.001). The acid-etched teeth had a significantly lower SBS in rebonding, regardless of the reconditioning method (P<0.001). The SBS of the teeth conditioned with Er:YAG laser in the first bonding did not show significant changes in rebonding, although mean SBS was higher compared to the first bonding (P=0.675). Bonding most often failed at the enamel-adhesive interface and enamel cracks were observed in a few teeth. Conclusion: The method of primary enamel preparation can affect SBS in rebonding. Based on our results, the mean SBS of Er:YAG-conditioned groups was clinically acceptable in bonding and rebonding, although it was lower compared to the acid-etched samples. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9355859/ http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v18i14.6139 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Soltanmohamadi Borujeni, Elahe
Chalipa, Javad
Etemadi, Ardavan
Nasiri, Maryam
Kharrazifard, Mohammad Javad
Akhoundi, Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching
title Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching
title_full Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching
title_fullStr Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching
title_short Comparison of Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Remnant Index and Enamel Cracks in Bonding and Rebonding of Stainless Steel Brackets to Enamel Surface Conditioned with Er:YAG Laser versus Conventional Acid Etching
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index and enamel cracks in bonding and rebonding of stainless steel brackets to enamel surface conditioned with er:yag laser versus conventional acid etching
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355859/
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/fid.v18i14.6139
work_keys_str_mv AT soltanmohamadiborujenielahe comparisonofshearbondstrengthadhesiveremnantindexandenamelcracksinbondingandrebondingofstainlesssteelbracketstoenamelsurfaceconditionedwitheryaglaserversusconventionalacidetching
AT chalipajavad comparisonofshearbondstrengthadhesiveremnantindexandenamelcracksinbondingandrebondingofstainlesssteelbracketstoenamelsurfaceconditionedwitheryaglaserversusconventionalacidetching
AT etemadiardavan comparisonofshearbondstrengthadhesiveremnantindexandenamelcracksinbondingandrebondingofstainlesssteelbracketstoenamelsurfaceconditionedwitheryaglaserversusconventionalacidetching
AT nasirimaryam comparisonofshearbondstrengthadhesiveremnantindexandenamelcracksinbondingandrebondingofstainlesssteelbracketstoenamelsurfaceconditionedwitheryaglaserversusconventionalacidetching
AT kharrazifardmohammadjavad comparisonofshearbondstrengthadhesiveremnantindexandenamelcracksinbondingandrebondingofstainlesssteelbracketstoenamelsurfaceconditionedwitheryaglaserversusconventionalacidetching
AT akhoundimohammadsadeghahmad comparisonofshearbondstrengthadhesiveremnantindexandenamelcracksinbondingandrebondingofstainlesssteelbracketstoenamelsurfaceconditionedwitheryaglaserversusconventionalacidetching