Cargando…
Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models?
Genomics has greatly increased the understanding of the study of breast cancer (BC) and has shaped the concept of intra-tumor heterogeneity, currently recognized as a propelling force for cancer progression. In this context, knowledge and understanding of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has somehow l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.044 |
_version_ | 1784763399556562944 |
---|---|
author | Cioce, Mario Sacconi, Andrea Donzelli, Sara Bonomo, Claudia Perracchio, Letizia Carosi, Mariantonia Telera, Stefano Fazio, Vito Michele Botti, Claudio Strano, Sabrina Blandino, Giovanni |
author_facet | Cioce, Mario Sacconi, Andrea Donzelli, Sara Bonomo, Claudia Perracchio, Letizia Carosi, Mariantonia Telera, Stefano Fazio, Vito Michele Botti, Claudio Strano, Sabrina Blandino, Giovanni |
author_sort | Cioce, Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomics has greatly increased the understanding of the study of breast cancer (BC) and has shaped the concept of intra-tumor heterogeneity, currently recognized as a propelling force for cancer progression. In this context, knowledge and understanding of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has somehow lagged behind that of primary breast cancer. This may be explained by the relative scarcity of matched mBC samples, however it is possible that the mutation spectrum obtained from primary BC does not capture the full complexity of the metastatic disease. Here, we provide a few examples supporting this possibility, from public databases. We evoke the need to perform an integrated multi-OMICS characterization of mBC, to obtain a broad understanding of this complex disease, whose evolution cannot be explained solely by genomics. Pertinent to this, we suggest that rather an infrequent use of Patient-Derived –Tumor-Organoids (PDTOs) may be influenced by assuming that the metastatic conditions of PDTOs growth (mPDTOs) should be similar to those of the tissue of origin. We challenge this view by suggesting that the use of “target-organ inspired” growth conditions for mPDTOs, may better fit the emerging knowledge of metastatic disease. Thus, the integrated use of multi-OMICS and of clinically relevant mPDTOs may allow a further understanding of such disease and foster therapeutically relevant advances. We believe that our points may be valid for other solid cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9355905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93559052022-08-17 Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models? Cioce, Mario Sacconi, Andrea Donzelli, Sara Bonomo, Claudia Perracchio, Letizia Carosi, Mariantonia Telera, Stefano Fazio, Vito Michele Botti, Claudio Strano, Sabrina Blandino, Giovanni Comput Struct Biotechnol J Review Article Genomics has greatly increased the understanding of the study of breast cancer (BC) and has shaped the concept of intra-tumor heterogeneity, currently recognized as a propelling force for cancer progression. In this context, knowledge and understanding of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has somehow lagged behind that of primary breast cancer. This may be explained by the relative scarcity of matched mBC samples, however it is possible that the mutation spectrum obtained from primary BC does not capture the full complexity of the metastatic disease. Here, we provide a few examples supporting this possibility, from public databases. We evoke the need to perform an integrated multi-OMICS characterization of mBC, to obtain a broad understanding of this complex disease, whose evolution cannot be explained solely by genomics. Pertinent to this, we suggest that rather an infrequent use of Patient-Derived –Tumor-Organoids (PDTOs) may be influenced by assuming that the metastatic conditions of PDTOs growth (mPDTOs) should be similar to those of the tissue of origin. We challenge this view by suggesting that the use of “target-organ inspired” growth conditions for mPDTOs, may better fit the emerging knowledge of metastatic disease. Thus, the integrated use of multi-OMICS and of clinically relevant mPDTOs may allow a further understanding of such disease and foster therapeutically relevant advances. We believe that our points may be valid for other solid cancers. Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology 2022-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9355905/ /pubmed/35983233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.044 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Cioce, Mario Sacconi, Andrea Donzelli, Sara Bonomo, Claudia Perracchio, Letizia Carosi, Mariantonia Telera, Stefano Fazio, Vito Michele Botti, Claudio Strano, Sabrina Blandino, Giovanni Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models? |
title | Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models? |
title_full | Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models? |
title_fullStr | Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models? |
title_full_unstemmed | Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models? |
title_short | Breast cancer metastasis: Is it a matter of OMICS and proper ex-vivo models? |
title_sort | breast cancer metastasis: is it a matter of omics and proper ex-vivo models? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9355905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ciocemario breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT sacconiandrea breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT donzellisara breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT bonomoclaudia breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT perracchioletizia breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT carosimariantonia breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT telerastefano breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT faziovitomichele breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT botticlaudio breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT stranosabrina breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels AT blandinogiovanni breastcancermetastasisisitamatterofomicsandproperexvivomodels |