Cargando…
Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines
Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047 |
_version_ | 1784763427979264000 |
---|---|
author | Marletta, Stefano Pantanowitz, Liron Malvi, Deborah Novelli, Luca Mescoli, Claudia Cardillo, Massimo D'Errico, Antonietta Girolami, Ilaria Eccher, Albino |
author_facet | Marletta, Stefano Pantanowitz, Liron Malvi, Deborah Novelli, Luca Mescoli, Claudia Cardillo, Massimo D'Errico, Antonietta Girolami, Ilaria Eccher, Albino |
author_sort | Marletta, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WSI) to light microscopy (LM) for intraoperative transplantation diagnosis using inexpensive portable devices. A validation study was conducted according to updated guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) utilizing 80 intraoperative transplantation cases. Two pathologists reviewed glass slides with LM and digital slides on two different tablets after a washout period of 4 weeks. Diagnostic concordance and intra-observer agreement were recorded. A total of 45 (56%) cases were suitable for rendering transplant diagnoses and 35 (44%) for assessing cancer risk. Intra-observer agreement was 95.1% for organ suitability and 100% for cancer risk. There were no major discordances that could affect patient transplant management. Digital evaluation of intraoperative transplant specimens using tablets to view whole slide images was non-inferior to LM for primary diagnosis. This suggests that after validating WSI these digital tools can be safely used for remote intraoperative transplantation diagnostic work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9356034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93560342022-08-07 Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines Marletta, Stefano Pantanowitz, Liron Malvi, Deborah Novelli, Luca Mescoli, Claudia Cardillo, Massimo D'Errico, Antonietta Girolami, Ilaria Eccher, Albino Acad Pathol Regular Article Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WSI) to light microscopy (LM) for intraoperative transplantation diagnosis using inexpensive portable devices. A validation study was conducted according to updated guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) utilizing 80 intraoperative transplantation cases. Two pathologists reviewed glass slides with LM and digital slides on two different tablets after a washout period of 4 weeks. Diagnostic concordance and intra-observer agreement were recorded. A total of 45 (56%) cases were suitable for rendering transplant diagnoses and 35 (44%) for assessing cancer risk. Intra-observer agreement was 95.1% for organ suitability and 100% for cancer risk. There were no major discordances that could affect patient transplant management. Digital evaluation of intraoperative transplant specimens using tablets to view whole slide images was non-inferior to LM for primary diagnosis. This suggests that after validating WSI these digital tools can be safely used for remote intraoperative transplantation diagnostic work. Elsevier 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9356034/ /pubmed/35941875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Marletta, Stefano Pantanowitz, Liron Malvi, Deborah Novelli, Luca Mescoli, Claudia Cardillo, Massimo D'Errico, Antonietta Girolami, Ilaria Eccher, Albino Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines |
title | Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines |
title_full | Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines |
title_fullStr | Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines |
title_short | Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines |
title_sort | validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the college of american pathologists guidelines |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marlettastefano validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT pantanowitzliron validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT malvideborah validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT novelliluca validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT mescoliclaudia validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT cardillomassimo validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT derricoantonietta validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT girolamiilaria validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines AT eccheralbino validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines |