Cargando…

Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines

Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marletta, Stefano, Pantanowitz, Liron, Malvi, Deborah, Novelli, Luca, Mescoli, Claudia, Cardillo, Massimo, D'Errico, Antonietta, Girolami, Ilaria, Eccher, Albino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047
_version_ 1784763427979264000
author Marletta, Stefano
Pantanowitz, Liron
Malvi, Deborah
Novelli, Luca
Mescoli, Claudia
Cardillo, Massimo
D'Errico, Antonietta
Girolami, Ilaria
Eccher, Albino
author_facet Marletta, Stefano
Pantanowitz, Liron
Malvi, Deborah
Novelli, Luca
Mescoli, Claudia
Cardillo, Massimo
D'Errico, Antonietta
Girolami, Ilaria
Eccher, Albino
author_sort Marletta, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WSI) to light microscopy (LM) for intraoperative transplantation diagnosis using inexpensive portable devices. A validation study was conducted according to updated guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) utilizing 80 intraoperative transplantation cases. Two pathologists reviewed glass slides with LM and digital slides on two different tablets after a washout period of 4 weeks. Diagnostic concordance and intra-observer agreement were recorded. A total of 45 (56%) cases were suitable for rendering transplant diagnoses and 35 (44%) for assessing cancer risk. Intra-observer agreement was 95.1% for organ suitability and 100% for cancer risk. There were no major discordances that could affect patient transplant management. Digital evaluation of intraoperative transplant specimens using tablets to view whole slide images was non-inferior to LM for primary diagnosis. This suggests that after validating WSI these digital tools can be safely used for remote intraoperative transplantation diagnostic work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9356034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93560342022-08-07 Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines Marletta, Stefano Pantanowitz, Liron Malvi, Deborah Novelli, Luca Mescoli, Claudia Cardillo, Massimo D'Errico, Antonietta Girolami, Ilaria Eccher, Albino Acad Pathol Regular Article Despite increased use of digital pathology, its application in the transplantation setting remains limited. One of the restraints is related to concerns that this technology is inadequate for supporting diagnostic work. In this study, we sought to establish non inferiority of whole slide imaging (WSI) to light microscopy (LM) for intraoperative transplantation diagnosis using inexpensive portable devices. A validation study was conducted according to updated guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP) utilizing 80 intraoperative transplantation cases. Two pathologists reviewed glass slides with LM and digital slides on two different tablets after a washout period of 4 weeks. Diagnostic concordance and intra-observer agreement were recorded. A total of 45 (56%) cases were suitable for rendering transplant diagnoses and 35 (44%) for assessing cancer risk. Intra-observer agreement was 95.1% for organ suitability and 100% for cancer risk. There were no major discordances that could affect patient transplant management. Digital evaluation of intraoperative transplant specimens using tablets to view whole slide images was non-inferior to LM for primary diagnosis. This suggests that after validating WSI these digital tools can be safely used for remote intraoperative transplantation diagnostic work. Elsevier 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9356034/ /pubmed/35941875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Marletta, Stefano
Pantanowitz, Liron
Malvi, Deborah
Novelli, Luca
Mescoli, Claudia
Cardillo, Massimo
D'Errico, Antonietta
Girolami, Ilaria
Eccher, Albino
Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines
title Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines
title_full Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines
title_fullStr Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines
title_short Validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the College of American Pathologists Guidelines
title_sort validation of portable tablets for transplant pathology diagnosis according to the college of american pathologists guidelines
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100047
work_keys_str_mv AT marlettastefano validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT pantanowitzliron validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT malvideborah validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT novelliluca validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT mescoliclaudia validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT cardillomassimo validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT derricoantonietta validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT girolamiilaria validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines
AT eccheralbino validationofportabletabletsfortransplantpathologydiagnosisaccordingtothecollegeofamericanpathologistsguidelines