Cargando…

Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation

BACKGROUND: Defibrillation guidelines recommend avoiding patient contact during shock delivery. However, hands-on defibrillation (compressions during shock) and manual pressure augmentation (MPA – pushing on the defibrillator pads during shock) may lead to improved clinical outcomes. There are limit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephens, Andrew F., Šeman, Michael, Nehme, Ziad, Voskoboinik, Aleksandr, Smith, Karen, Gregory, Shaun D., Stub, Dion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100284
_version_ 1784763480660770816
author Stephens, Andrew F.
Šeman, Michael
Nehme, Ziad
Voskoboinik, Aleksandr
Smith, Karen
Gregory, Shaun D.
Stub, Dion
author_facet Stephens, Andrew F.
Šeman, Michael
Nehme, Ziad
Voskoboinik, Aleksandr
Smith, Karen
Gregory, Shaun D.
Stub, Dion
author_sort Stephens, Andrew F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Defibrillation guidelines recommend avoiding patient contact during shock delivery. However, hands-on defibrillation (compressions during shock) and manual pressure augmentation (MPA – pushing on the defibrillator pads during shock) may lead to improved clinical outcomes. There are limited data addressing the protection provided by personal protective equipment (PPE) during hands-on defibrillation and MPA. This study investigated the hand-to-hand and hand-to-knee leakage current experienced by a simulated kneeling provider wearing different PPE. METHODS: A defibrillator was used in experiments on a pork shoulder, investigating three different hands-on positions: closed fist on defibrillator pads; open palm on pads with inadvertent finger contact (overhang); and open palm on the chest. Evaluated PPE included single and double gloves (nitrile and latex) and rescuer cargo trousers in wet and dry conditions (N = 126 experiments). RESULTS: Mean hand-to-hand leakage currents in MPA without PPE was 0.41 mA (0.2–0.74 mA) and with PPE was 0.2 mA (0.08–0.58 mA). For experiments involving finger or palm contact on the chest, wearing any PPE resulted in a >99% reduction in mean leakage currents from an average 354.58 mA (258.96–446.22 mA) to an average 0.48 mA (0.16–1.56 mA). Rescuer trousers were insulative in dry conditions even without gloves (0.2–1.2 mA). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the tested clinical examination gloves markedly reduced leakage current to the rescuer and that the lowest levels of leakage current occurred during MPA attributed to the electrical insulation of the pads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9356271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93562712022-08-07 Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation Stephens, Andrew F. Šeman, Michael Nehme, Ziad Voskoboinik, Aleksandr Smith, Karen Gregory, Shaun D. Stub, Dion Resusc Plus Experimental Paper BACKGROUND: Defibrillation guidelines recommend avoiding patient contact during shock delivery. However, hands-on defibrillation (compressions during shock) and manual pressure augmentation (MPA – pushing on the defibrillator pads during shock) may lead to improved clinical outcomes. There are limited data addressing the protection provided by personal protective equipment (PPE) during hands-on defibrillation and MPA. This study investigated the hand-to-hand and hand-to-knee leakage current experienced by a simulated kneeling provider wearing different PPE. METHODS: A defibrillator was used in experiments on a pork shoulder, investigating three different hands-on positions: closed fist on defibrillator pads; open palm on pads with inadvertent finger contact (overhang); and open palm on the chest. Evaluated PPE included single and double gloves (nitrile and latex) and rescuer cargo trousers in wet and dry conditions (N = 126 experiments). RESULTS: Mean hand-to-hand leakage currents in MPA without PPE was 0.41 mA (0.2–0.74 mA) and with PPE was 0.2 mA (0.08–0.58 mA). For experiments involving finger or palm contact on the chest, wearing any PPE resulted in a >99% reduction in mean leakage currents from an average 354.58 mA (258.96–446.22 mA) to an average 0.48 mA (0.16–1.56 mA). Rescuer trousers were insulative in dry conditions even without gloves (0.2–1.2 mA). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the tested clinical examination gloves markedly reduced leakage current to the rescuer and that the lowest levels of leakage current occurred during MPA attributed to the electrical insulation of the pads. Elsevier 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9356271/ /pubmed/35942482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100284 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Experimental Paper
Stephens, Andrew F.
Šeman, Michael
Nehme, Ziad
Voskoboinik, Aleksandr
Smith, Karen
Gregory, Shaun D.
Stub, Dion
Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
title Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
title_full Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
title_fullStr Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
title_short Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
title_sort ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
topic Experimental Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100284
work_keys_str_mv AT stephensandrewf exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation
AT semanmichael exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation
AT nehmeziad exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation
AT voskoboinikaleksandr exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation
AT smithkaren exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation
AT gregoryshaund exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation
AT stubdion exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation