Cargando…
Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation
BACKGROUND: Defibrillation guidelines recommend avoiding patient contact during shock delivery. However, hands-on defibrillation (compressions during shock) and manual pressure augmentation (MPA – pushing on the defibrillator pads during shock) may lead to improved clinical outcomes. There are limit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100284 |
_version_ | 1784763480660770816 |
---|---|
author | Stephens, Andrew F. Šeman, Michael Nehme, Ziad Voskoboinik, Aleksandr Smith, Karen Gregory, Shaun D. Stub, Dion |
author_facet | Stephens, Andrew F. Šeman, Michael Nehme, Ziad Voskoboinik, Aleksandr Smith, Karen Gregory, Shaun D. Stub, Dion |
author_sort | Stephens, Andrew F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Defibrillation guidelines recommend avoiding patient contact during shock delivery. However, hands-on defibrillation (compressions during shock) and manual pressure augmentation (MPA – pushing on the defibrillator pads during shock) may lead to improved clinical outcomes. There are limited data addressing the protection provided by personal protective equipment (PPE) during hands-on defibrillation and MPA. This study investigated the hand-to-hand and hand-to-knee leakage current experienced by a simulated kneeling provider wearing different PPE. METHODS: A defibrillator was used in experiments on a pork shoulder, investigating three different hands-on positions: closed fist on defibrillator pads; open palm on pads with inadvertent finger contact (overhang); and open palm on the chest. Evaluated PPE included single and double gloves (nitrile and latex) and rescuer cargo trousers in wet and dry conditions (N = 126 experiments). RESULTS: Mean hand-to-hand leakage currents in MPA without PPE was 0.41 mA (0.2–0.74 mA) and with PPE was 0.2 mA (0.08–0.58 mA). For experiments involving finger or palm contact on the chest, wearing any PPE resulted in a >99% reduction in mean leakage currents from an average 354.58 mA (258.96–446.22 mA) to an average 0.48 mA (0.16–1.56 mA). Rescuer trousers were insulative in dry conditions even without gloves (0.2–1.2 mA). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the tested clinical examination gloves markedly reduced leakage current to the rescuer and that the lowest levels of leakage current occurred during MPA attributed to the electrical insulation of the pads. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9356271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93562712022-08-07 Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation Stephens, Andrew F. Šeman, Michael Nehme, Ziad Voskoboinik, Aleksandr Smith, Karen Gregory, Shaun D. Stub, Dion Resusc Plus Experimental Paper BACKGROUND: Defibrillation guidelines recommend avoiding patient contact during shock delivery. However, hands-on defibrillation (compressions during shock) and manual pressure augmentation (MPA – pushing on the defibrillator pads during shock) may lead to improved clinical outcomes. There are limited data addressing the protection provided by personal protective equipment (PPE) during hands-on defibrillation and MPA. This study investigated the hand-to-hand and hand-to-knee leakage current experienced by a simulated kneeling provider wearing different PPE. METHODS: A defibrillator was used in experiments on a pork shoulder, investigating three different hands-on positions: closed fist on defibrillator pads; open palm on pads with inadvertent finger contact (overhang); and open palm on the chest. Evaluated PPE included single and double gloves (nitrile and latex) and rescuer cargo trousers in wet and dry conditions (N = 126 experiments). RESULTS: Mean hand-to-hand leakage currents in MPA without PPE was 0.41 mA (0.2–0.74 mA) and with PPE was 0.2 mA (0.08–0.58 mA). For experiments involving finger or palm contact on the chest, wearing any PPE resulted in a >99% reduction in mean leakage currents from an average 354.58 mA (258.96–446.22 mA) to an average 0.48 mA (0.16–1.56 mA). Rescuer trousers were insulative in dry conditions even without gloves (0.2–1.2 mA). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the tested clinical examination gloves markedly reduced leakage current to the rescuer and that the lowest levels of leakage current occurred during MPA attributed to the electrical insulation of the pads. Elsevier 2022-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9356271/ /pubmed/35942482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100284 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Experimental Paper Stephens, Andrew F. Šeman, Michael Nehme, Ziad Voskoboinik, Aleksandr Smith, Karen Gregory, Shaun D. Stub, Dion Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation |
title | Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation |
title_full | Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation |
title_fullStr | Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation |
title_short | Ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation |
title_sort | ex vivo evaluation of personal protective equipment in hands-on defibrillation |
topic | Experimental Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stephensandrewf exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation AT semanmichael exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation AT nehmeziad exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation AT voskoboinikaleksandr exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation AT smithkaren exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation AT gregoryshaund exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation AT stubdion exvivoevaluationofpersonalprotectiveequipmentinhandsondefibrillation |