Cargando…

The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors

INTRODUCTION: This study presents a novel molecular parameter potentially co‐defining tumor biology—the total tumor suppressor gene (TSG) count at chromosomal loci harboring genes rearranged in fusion‐defined tumors. It belongs to the family of molecular parameters created using a black‐box approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosaieby, Elaheh, Martínek, Petr, Ondič, Ondrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1994
_version_ 1784763542122004480
author Mosaieby, Elaheh
Martínek, Petr
Ondič, Ondrej
author_facet Mosaieby, Elaheh
Martínek, Petr
Ondič, Ondrej
author_sort Mosaieby, Elaheh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study presents a novel molecular parameter potentially co‐defining tumor biology—the total tumor suppressor gene (TSG) count at chromosomal loci harboring genes rearranged in fusion‐defined tumors. It belongs to the family of molecular parameters created using a black‐box approach. METHOD: It is based on a public curated Texas TSG database. Its data are regrouped based on individual genes loci using another public database (Genecards). The total TSG count for NTRK (NTRK1; OMIM: 191315; NTRK2; OMIM: 600456; NTRK3; OMIM: 191316), NRG1 (OMIM: 142445), and RET (OMIM: 164761) rearranged tumors in patients treated with a theranostic approach is calculated using the results of recently published studies. RESULTS: Altogether 138 loci containing at least three TSGs are identified. These include 21 “extremely hot” spots, with 10 to 28 TSGs mapping to a given locus. However, the study falls short of finding a correlation between tumor regression or patient survival and the TSG count owing to a low number of cases meeting the study criteria. CONCLUSION: The total TSG count alone cannot predict the biology of translocation‐defined tumors. The addition of other parameters, including microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutation burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and copy number heterogeneity (CNH), might be helpful. Thus a multi‐modal data integration is advocated. We believe that large scale studies should evaluate the significance and value of the total TSG count.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9356546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93565462022-08-09 The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors Mosaieby, Elaheh Martínek, Petr Ondič, Ondrej Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles INTRODUCTION: This study presents a novel molecular parameter potentially co‐defining tumor biology—the total tumor suppressor gene (TSG) count at chromosomal loci harboring genes rearranged in fusion‐defined tumors. It belongs to the family of molecular parameters created using a black‐box approach. METHOD: It is based on a public curated Texas TSG database. Its data are regrouped based on individual genes loci using another public database (Genecards). The total TSG count for NTRK (NTRK1; OMIM: 191315; NTRK2; OMIM: 600456; NTRK3; OMIM: 191316), NRG1 (OMIM: 142445), and RET (OMIM: 164761) rearranged tumors in patients treated with a theranostic approach is calculated using the results of recently published studies. RESULTS: Altogether 138 loci containing at least three TSGs are identified. These include 21 “extremely hot” spots, with 10 to 28 TSGs mapping to a given locus. However, the study falls short of finding a correlation between tumor regression or patient survival and the TSG count owing to a low number of cases meeting the study criteria. CONCLUSION: The total TSG count alone cannot predict the biology of translocation‐defined tumors. The addition of other parameters, including microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor mutation burden (TMB), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), and copy number heterogeneity (CNH), might be helpful. Thus a multi‐modal data integration is advocated. We believe that large scale studies should evaluate the significance and value of the total TSG count. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9356546/ /pubmed/35621010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1994 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Mosaieby, Elaheh
Martínek, Petr
Ondič, Ondrej
The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors
title The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors
title_full The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors
title_fullStr The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors
title_full_unstemmed The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors
title_short The significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors
title_sort significance of the fusion partner gene genomic neighborhood analysis in translocation‐defined tumors
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1994
work_keys_str_mv AT mosaiebyelaheh thesignificanceofthefusionpartnergenegenomicneighborhoodanalysisintranslocationdefinedtumors
AT martinekpetr thesignificanceofthefusionpartnergenegenomicneighborhoodanalysisintranslocationdefinedtumors
AT ondicondrej thesignificanceofthefusionpartnergenegenomicneighborhoodanalysisintranslocationdefinedtumors
AT mosaiebyelaheh significanceofthefusionpartnergenegenomicneighborhoodanalysisintranslocationdefinedtumors
AT martinekpetr significanceofthefusionpartnergenegenomicneighborhoodanalysisintranslocationdefinedtumors
AT ondicondrej significanceofthefusionpartnergenegenomicneighborhoodanalysisintranslocationdefinedtumors