Cargando…

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia

PURPOSE: AcrySof IQ Vivity is a unique non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens with wavefront-shaping X-WAVE technology. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (DFT015) compared with standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (SN60WF), fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bala, Chandra, Athanasiov, Paul, Holland, Jason, Dhariwal, Mukesh, Gupta, Amit, Rathi, Hemant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942082
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370420
_version_ 1784763575815897088
author Bala, Chandra
Athanasiov, Paul
Holland, Jason
Dhariwal, Mukesh
Gupta, Amit
Rathi, Hemant
author_facet Bala, Chandra
Athanasiov, Paul
Holland, Jason
Dhariwal, Mukesh
Gupta, Amit
Rathi, Hemant
author_sort Bala, Chandra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: AcrySof IQ Vivity is a unique non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens with wavefront-shaping X-WAVE technology. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (DFT015) compared with standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (SN60WF), from a private health fund perspective in Australia. METHODS: A Markov model was developed using the following health states: well, need for spectacles (near/distance/bifocal/varifocal), very bothersome visual disturbances (glare/haloes/starbursts) – with/without spectacles, and death. Model inputs were sourced from a randomized clinical study (NCT03010254), published literature, prostheses list and clinical opinion. A lifetime horizon (up to 30 years) was considered, and cost and health outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. Model outcomes included incremental cost–effectiveness ratio defined as incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gain. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Bilateral implantation of DFT015 intraocular lens provided quality adjusted life year gain of 0.16 at an incremental cost of AU$307 compared to bilateral SN60WF, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$1908/quality adjusted life year, well below the cost-effectiveness threshold (Range: AU$45,000-AU$75,000) typically used by Medical Services Advisory Committee in Australia. Results were most sensitive to intraocular lens costs, post-operative spectacle dependence, and disutility due to wearing glasses. Robustness of the results was further confirmed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. CONCLUSION: AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens is a highly cost-effective treatment strategy with improved vision-related quality of life outcomes for presbyopic cataract surgery patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9356702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93567022022-08-07 A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia Bala, Chandra Athanasiov, Paul Holland, Jason Dhariwal, Mukesh Gupta, Amit Rathi, Hemant Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: AcrySof IQ Vivity is a unique non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens with wavefront-shaping X-WAVE technology. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (DFT015) compared with standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (SN60WF), from a private health fund perspective in Australia. METHODS: A Markov model was developed using the following health states: well, need for spectacles (near/distance/bifocal/varifocal), very bothersome visual disturbances (glare/haloes/starbursts) – with/without spectacles, and death. Model inputs were sourced from a randomized clinical study (NCT03010254), published literature, prostheses list and clinical opinion. A lifetime horizon (up to 30 years) was considered, and cost and health outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. Model outcomes included incremental cost–effectiveness ratio defined as incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gain. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Bilateral implantation of DFT015 intraocular lens provided quality adjusted life year gain of 0.16 at an incremental cost of AU$307 compared to bilateral SN60WF, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$1908/quality adjusted life year, well below the cost-effectiveness threshold (Range: AU$45,000-AU$75,000) typically used by Medical Services Advisory Committee in Australia. Results were most sensitive to intraocular lens costs, post-operative spectacle dependence, and disutility due to wearing glasses. Robustness of the results was further confirmed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. CONCLUSION: AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens is a highly cost-effective treatment strategy with improved vision-related quality of life outcomes for presbyopic cataract surgery patients. Dove 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9356702/ /pubmed/35942082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370420 Text en © 2022 Bala et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bala, Chandra
Athanasiov, Paul
Holland, Jason
Dhariwal, Mukesh
Gupta, Amit
Rathi, Hemant
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia
title A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia
title_full A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia
title_fullStr A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia
title_full_unstemmed A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia
title_short A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of acrysof iq vivity intraocular lens (iol) from private health fund perspective in australia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942082
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370420
work_keys_str_mv AT balachandra acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT athanasiovpaul acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT hollandjason acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT dhariwalmukesh acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT guptaamit acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT rathihemant acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT balachandra costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT athanasiovpaul costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT hollandjason costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT dhariwalmukesh costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT guptaamit costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia
AT rathihemant costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia