Cargando…
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia
PURPOSE: AcrySof IQ Vivity is a unique non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens with wavefront-shaping X-WAVE technology. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (DFT015) compared with standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (SN60WF), fr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370420 |
_version_ | 1784763575815897088 |
---|---|
author | Bala, Chandra Athanasiov, Paul Holland, Jason Dhariwal, Mukesh Gupta, Amit Rathi, Hemant |
author_facet | Bala, Chandra Athanasiov, Paul Holland, Jason Dhariwal, Mukesh Gupta, Amit Rathi, Hemant |
author_sort | Bala, Chandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: AcrySof IQ Vivity is a unique non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens with wavefront-shaping X-WAVE technology. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (DFT015) compared with standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (SN60WF), from a private health fund perspective in Australia. METHODS: A Markov model was developed using the following health states: well, need for spectacles (near/distance/bifocal/varifocal), very bothersome visual disturbances (glare/haloes/starbursts) – with/without spectacles, and death. Model inputs were sourced from a randomized clinical study (NCT03010254), published literature, prostheses list and clinical opinion. A lifetime horizon (up to 30 years) was considered, and cost and health outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. Model outcomes included incremental cost–effectiveness ratio defined as incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gain. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Bilateral implantation of DFT015 intraocular lens provided quality adjusted life year gain of 0.16 at an incremental cost of AU$307 compared to bilateral SN60WF, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$1908/quality adjusted life year, well below the cost-effectiveness threshold (Range: AU$45,000-AU$75,000) typically used by Medical Services Advisory Committee in Australia. Results were most sensitive to intraocular lens costs, post-operative spectacle dependence, and disutility due to wearing glasses. Robustness of the results was further confirmed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. CONCLUSION: AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens is a highly cost-effective treatment strategy with improved vision-related quality of life outcomes for presbyopic cataract surgery patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9356702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93567022022-08-07 A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia Bala, Chandra Athanasiov, Paul Holland, Jason Dhariwal, Mukesh Gupta, Amit Rathi, Hemant Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: AcrySof IQ Vivity is a unique non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens with wavefront-shaping X-WAVE technology. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens (DFT015) compared with standard aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (SN60WF), from a private health fund perspective in Australia. METHODS: A Markov model was developed using the following health states: well, need for spectacles (near/distance/bifocal/varifocal), very bothersome visual disturbances (glare/haloes/starbursts) – with/without spectacles, and death. Model inputs were sourced from a randomized clinical study (NCT03010254), published literature, prostheses list and clinical opinion. A lifetime horizon (up to 30 years) was considered, and cost and health outcomes were discounted at 5% per annum. Model outcomes included incremental cost–effectiveness ratio defined as incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gain. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: Bilateral implantation of DFT015 intraocular lens provided quality adjusted life year gain of 0.16 at an incremental cost of AU$307 compared to bilateral SN60WF, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AU$1908/quality adjusted life year, well below the cost-effectiveness threshold (Range: AU$45,000-AU$75,000) typically used by Medical Services Advisory Committee in Australia. Results were most sensitive to intraocular lens costs, post-operative spectacle dependence, and disutility due to wearing glasses. Robustness of the results was further confirmed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. CONCLUSION: AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens is a highly cost-effective treatment strategy with improved vision-related quality of life outcomes for presbyopic cataract surgery patients. Dove 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9356702/ /pubmed/35942082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370420 Text en © 2022 Bala et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bala, Chandra Athanasiov, Paul Holland, Jason Dhariwal, Mukesh Gupta, Amit Rathi, Hemant A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia |
title | A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia |
title_full | A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia |
title_fullStr | A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia |
title_short | A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of AcrySof IQ Vivity Intraocular Lens (IOL) from Private Health Fund Perspective in Australia |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of acrysof iq vivity intraocular lens (iol) from private health fund perspective in australia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S370420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balachandra acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT athanasiovpaul acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT hollandjason acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT dhariwalmukesh acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT guptaamit acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT rathihemant acosteffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT balachandra costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT athanasiovpaul costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT hollandjason costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT dhariwalmukesh costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT guptaamit costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia AT rathihemant costeffectivenessanalysisofacrysofiqvivityintraocularlensiolfromprivatehealthfundperspectiveinaustralia |