Cargando…

Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment

PURPOSE: For an integrated care programme to be successful, preferences of the stakeholders involved should be aligned. The aim of this study is to investigate to which extent outcomes beyond health are valued and to study the heterogeneity of preferences of those involved in integrated care. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoedemakers, Maaike, Karimi, Milad, Jonker, Marcel, Tsiachristas, Apostolos, Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03147-6
_version_ 1784763632492478464
author Hoedemakers, Maaike
Karimi, Milad
Jonker, Marcel
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen
author_facet Hoedemakers, Maaike
Karimi, Milad
Jonker, Marcel
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen
author_sort Hoedemakers, Maaike
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: For an integrated care programme to be successful, preferences of the stakeholders involved should be aligned. The aim of this study is to investigate to which extent outcomes beyond health are valued and to study the heterogeneity of preferences of those involved in integrated care. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit preferences for eight Triple Aim outcomes, i.e., physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships & participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centeredness, continuity of care and total health and social care costs. Stakeholders were recruited among Dutch persons with multi-morbidity, informal caregivers, professionals, payers, and policymakers. A Bayesian mixed-logit model was used to analyse the data. Subsequently, a latent class analysis was performed to identify stakeholders with similar preferences. RESULTS: 739 stakeholders completed the DCE. Enjoyment of life was perceived as the most important outcome (relative importance: 0.221) across stakeholders, while total health and social care costs were perceived as least important (0.063). The latent class analysis identified four classes. The first class (19.9%) put most weight on experience with care outcomes. The second class (39%) favoured enjoyment of life. The third class (18%) focused relatively more on physical health. The fourth class (24%) had the least consistent preferences. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted the heterogeneity in views of stakeholders in integrated care on what is important in health(care) for persons with multi-morbidity. To accurately value integrated care a variety of outcomes beyond health–e.g., enjoyment of life and experience with care–should be taken into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03147-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9356934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93569342022-08-08 Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment Hoedemakers, Maaike Karimi, Milad Jonker, Marcel Tsiachristas, Apostolos Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: For an integrated care programme to be successful, preferences of the stakeholders involved should be aligned. The aim of this study is to investigate to which extent outcomes beyond health are valued and to study the heterogeneity of preferences of those involved in integrated care. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit preferences for eight Triple Aim outcomes, i.e., physical functioning, psychological well-being, social relationships & participation, enjoyment of life, resilience, person-centeredness, continuity of care and total health and social care costs. Stakeholders were recruited among Dutch persons with multi-morbidity, informal caregivers, professionals, payers, and policymakers. A Bayesian mixed-logit model was used to analyse the data. Subsequently, a latent class analysis was performed to identify stakeholders with similar preferences. RESULTS: 739 stakeholders completed the DCE. Enjoyment of life was perceived as the most important outcome (relative importance: 0.221) across stakeholders, while total health and social care costs were perceived as least important (0.063). The latent class analysis identified four classes. The first class (19.9%) put most weight on experience with care outcomes. The second class (39%) favoured enjoyment of life. The third class (18%) focused relatively more on physical health. The fourth class (24%) had the least consistent preferences. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted the heterogeneity in views of stakeholders in integrated care on what is important in health(care) for persons with multi-morbidity. To accurately value integrated care a variety of outcomes beyond health–e.g., enjoyment of life and experience with care–should be taken into account. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03147-6. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9356934/ /pubmed/35585287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03147-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hoedemakers, Maaike
Karimi, Milad
Jonker, Marcel
Tsiachristas, Apostolos
Rutten-van Mölken, Maureen
Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment
title Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment
title_full Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment
title_fullStr Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment
title_short Heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment
title_sort heterogeneity in preferences for outcomes of integrated care for persons with multiple chronic diseases: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03147-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hoedemakersmaaike heterogeneityinpreferencesforoutcomesofintegratedcareforpersonswithmultiplechronicdiseasesalatentclassanalysisofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT karimimilad heterogeneityinpreferencesforoutcomesofintegratedcareforpersonswithmultiplechronicdiseasesalatentclassanalysisofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT jonkermarcel heterogeneityinpreferencesforoutcomesofintegratedcareforpersonswithmultiplechronicdiseasesalatentclassanalysisofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT tsiachristasapostolos heterogeneityinpreferencesforoutcomesofintegratedcareforpersonswithmultiplechronicdiseasesalatentclassanalysisofadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT ruttenvanmolkenmaureen heterogeneityinpreferencesforoutcomesofintegratedcareforpersonswithmultiplechronicdiseasesalatentclassanalysisofadiscretechoiceexperiment