Cargando…

Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Introduction Incidental discovery of gallbladder cancer (GBC) on postoperative histopathology or intra-operative suspicion is becoming increasingly frequent since laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the standard of care for gallstone disease. Incidental GBC (IGBC) portends a better survival than pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahul, Rahul, Haldenia, Kulbhushan, Singh, Ashish, Kapoor, Vishwas, Singh, Rajneesh K, Saxena, Rajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949769
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26653
_version_ 1784763672061542400
author Rahul, Rahul
Haldenia, Kulbhushan
Singh, Ashish
Kapoor, Vishwas
Singh, Rajneesh K
Saxena, Rajan
author_facet Rahul, Rahul
Haldenia, Kulbhushan
Singh, Ashish
Kapoor, Vishwas
Singh, Rajneesh K
Saxena, Rajan
author_sort Rahul, Rahul
collection PubMed
description Introduction Incidental discovery of gallbladder cancer (GBC) on postoperative histopathology or intra-operative suspicion is becoming increasingly frequent since laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the standard of care for gallstone disease. Incidental GBC (IGBC) portends a better survival than primarily detected GBC. Various factors affect the outcome of re-resection with the timing of re-intervention an important determinant of survival. Methods All patients of IGBC who underwent curative resection from January 2009 to December 2018 were considered for analysis. Details of demographic profile, index surgery, and operative findings on re-resection, histopathology and follow-up were retrieved from the prospectively maintained database. Patients were evaluated in three groups based on the interval between index cholecystectomy and re-resection: Early (<4 weeks), Intermediate (4-12 weeks) and Late (>12 weeks), using appropriate statistical tests. Results Ninety-one patients were admitted with IGBC during the study period of which 48 underwent re-resection with curative intent. The median age of presentation was 55 years (31-77 years). The median duration of follow-up was 40.6 months (Range: 1.2-130.6 months). Overall and disease-free survival among the above-mentioned three groups was the best in the early group (104 and 102 months) as compared to the intermediate (84 and 83 months) and late groups (75 and 73 months), though the difference failed to achieve statistical significance (p=0.588 and 0.581). On univariate analysis, factors associated with poor outcome were node metastasis, need for common bile duct (CBD) excision and high-grade tumor. However, on multivariate analysis, poor differentiation was the only independent factor affecting survival. Conclusion Early surgery, preferably within four weeks, possibly entails better survival in incidentally detected GBC. The grade of a tumor, however, is the most important determinant of survival in IGBC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9357255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93572552022-08-09 Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Rahul, Rahul Haldenia, Kulbhushan Singh, Ashish Kapoor, Vishwas Singh, Rajneesh K Saxena, Rajan Cureus Gastroenterology Introduction Incidental discovery of gallbladder cancer (GBC) on postoperative histopathology or intra-operative suspicion is becoming increasingly frequent since laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the standard of care for gallstone disease. Incidental GBC (IGBC) portends a better survival than primarily detected GBC. Various factors affect the outcome of re-resection with the timing of re-intervention an important determinant of survival. Methods All patients of IGBC who underwent curative resection from January 2009 to December 2018 were considered for analysis. Details of demographic profile, index surgery, and operative findings on re-resection, histopathology and follow-up were retrieved from the prospectively maintained database. Patients were evaluated in three groups based on the interval between index cholecystectomy and re-resection: Early (<4 weeks), Intermediate (4-12 weeks) and Late (>12 weeks), using appropriate statistical tests. Results Ninety-one patients were admitted with IGBC during the study period of which 48 underwent re-resection with curative intent. The median age of presentation was 55 years (31-77 years). The median duration of follow-up was 40.6 months (Range: 1.2-130.6 months). Overall and disease-free survival among the above-mentioned three groups was the best in the early group (104 and 102 months) as compared to the intermediate (84 and 83 months) and late groups (75 and 73 months), though the difference failed to achieve statistical significance (p=0.588 and 0.581). On univariate analysis, factors associated with poor outcome were node metastasis, need for common bile duct (CBD) excision and high-grade tumor. However, on multivariate analysis, poor differentiation was the only independent factor affecting survival. Conclusion Early surgery, preferably within four weeks, possibly entails better survival in incidentally detected GBC. The grade of a tumor, however, is the most important determinant of survival in IGBC. Cureus 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9357255/ /pubmed/35949769 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26653 Text en Copyright © 2022, Rahul et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology
Rahul, Rahul
Haldenia, Kulbhushan
Singh, Ashish
Kapoor, Vishwas
Singh, Rajneesh K
Saxena, Rajan
Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
title Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
title_full Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
title_short Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
title_sort does timing of completion radical cholecystectomy determine the survival outcome in incidental carcinoma gallbladder: a single-center retrospective analysis
topic Gastroenterology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949769
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26653
work_keys_str_mv AT rahulrahul doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT haldeniakulbhushan doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT singhashish doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT kapoorvishwas doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT singhrajneeshk doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT saxenarajan doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis