Cargando…
Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
Introduction Incidental discovery of gallbladder cancer (GBC) on postoperative histopathology or intra-operative suspicion is becoming increasingly frequent since laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the standard of care for gallstone disease. Incidental GBC (IGBC) portends a better survival than pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949769 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26653 |
_version_ | 1784763672061542400 |
---|---|
author | Rahul, Rahul Haldenia, Kulbhushan Singh, Ashish Kapoor, Vishwas Singh, Rajneesh K Saxena, Rajan |
author_facet | Rahul, Rahul Haldenia, Kulbhushan Singh, Ashish Kapoor, Vishwas Singh, Rajneesh K Saxena, Rajan |
author_sort | Rahul, Rahul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Incidental discovery of gallbladder cancer (GBC) on postoperative histopathology or intra-operative suspicion is becoming increasingly frequent since laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the standard of care for gallstone disease. Incidental GBC (IGBC) portends a better survival than primarily detected GBC. Various factors affect the outcome of re-resection with the timing of re-intervention an important determinant of survival. Methods All patients of IGBC who underwent curative resection from January 2009 to December 2018 were considered for analysis. Details of demographic profile, index surgery, and operative findings on re-resection, histopathology and follow-up were retrieved from the prospectively maintained database. Patients were evaluated in three groups based on the interval between index cholecystectomy and re-resection: Early (<4 weeks), Intermediate (4-12 weeks) and Late (>12 weeks), using appropriate statistical tests. Results Ninety-one patients were admitted with IGBC during the study period of which 48 underwent re-resection with curative intent. The median age of presentation was 55 years (31-77 years). The median duration of follow-up was 40.6 months (Range: 1.2-130.6 months). Overall and disease-free survival among the above-mentioned three groups was the best in the early group (104 and 102 months) as compared to the intermediate (84 and 83 months) and late groups (75 and 73 months), though the difference failed to achieve statistical significance (p=0.588 and 0.581). On univariate analysis, factors associated with poor outcome were node metastasis, need for common bile duct (CBD) excision and high-grade tumor. However, on multivariate analysis, poor differentiation was the only independent factor affecting survival. Conclusion Early surgery, preferably within four weeks, possibly entails better survival in incidentally detected GBC. The grade of a tumor, however, is the most important determinant of survival in IGBC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9357255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93572552022-08-09 Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Rahul, Rahul Haldenia, Kulbhushan Singh, Ashish Kapoor, Vishwas Singh, Rajneesh K Saxena, Rajan Cureus Gastroenterology Introduction Incidental discovery of gallbladder cancer (GBC) on postoperative histopathology or intra-operative suspicion is becoming increasingly frequent since laparoscopic cholecystectomy became the standard of care for gallstone disease. Incidental GBC (IGBC) portends a better survival than primarily detected GBC. Various factors affect the outcome of re-resection with the timing of re-intervention an important determinant of survival. Methods All patients of IGBC who underwent curative resection from January 2009 to December 2018 were considered for analysis. Details of demographic profile, index surgery, and operative findings on re-resection, histopathology and follow-up were retrieved from the prospectively maintained database. Patients were evaluated in three groups based on the interval between index cholecystectomy and re-resection: Early (<4 weeks), Intermediate (4-12 weeks) and Late (>12 weeks), using appropriate statistical tests. Results Ninety-one patients were admitted with IGBC during the study period of which 48 underwent re-resection with curative intent. The median age of presentation was 55 years (31-77 years). The median duration of follow-up was 40.6 months (Range: 1.2-130.6 months). Overall and disease-free survival among the above-mentioned three groups was the best in the early group (104 and 102 months) as compared to the intermediate (84 and 83 months) and late groups (75 and 73 months), though the difference failed to achieve statistical significance (p=0.588 and 0.581). On univariate analysis, factors associated with poor outcome were node metastasis, need for common bile duct (CBD) excision and high-grade tumor. However, on multivariate analysis, poor differentiation was the only independent factor affecting survival. Conclusion Early surgery, preferably within four weeks, possibly entails better survival in incidentally detected GBC. The grade of a tumor, however, is the most important determinant of survival in IGBC. Cureus 2022-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9357255/ /pubmed/35949769 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26653 Text en Copyright © 2022, Rahul et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology Rahul, Rahul Haldenia, Kulbhushan Singh, Ashish Kapoor, Vishwas Singh, Rajneesh K Saxena, Rajan Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis |
title | Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis |
title_full | Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis |
title_fullStr | Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis |
title_short | Does Timing of Completion Radical Cholecystectomy Determine the Survival Outcome in Incidental Carcinoma Gallbladder: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis |
title_sort | does timing of completion radical cholecystectomy determine the survival outcome in incidental carcinoma gallbladder: a single-center retrospective analysis |
topic | Gastroenterology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949769 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahulrahul doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis AT haldeniakulbhushan doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis AT singhashish doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis AT kapoorvishwas doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis AT singhrajneeshk doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis AT saxenarajan doestimingofcompletionradicalcholecystectomydeterminethesurvivaloutcomeinincidentalcarcinomagallbladderasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis |