Cargando…

The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings

INTRODUCTION: It can be challenging for dermatologists to keep abreast of the growing evidence from published indirect comparisons (ICs) of treatments for psoriasis. The objective of this analysis was to summarise comparative clinical efficacy and safety findings from ICs of systemic biologics for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Augustin, Matthias, Schuster, Christopher, Mert, Can, Nast, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00765-3
_version_ 1784763744754073600
author Augustin, Matthias
Schuster, Christopher
Mert, Can
Nast, Alexander
author_facet Augustin, Matthias
Schuster, Christopher
Mert, Can
Nast, Alexander
author_sort Augustin, Matthias
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It can be challenging for dermatologists to keep abreast of the growing evidence from published indirect comparisons (ICs) of treatments for psoriasis. The objective of this analysis was to summarise comparative clinical efficacy and safety findings from ICs of systemic biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and to identify factors potentially affecting efficacy outcomes and their possible implications for clinical decision making. METHODS: An umbrella review of short- and long-term efficacy and safety findings from 26 ICs visually compared 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI90) treatment rankings and three safety outcome rankings side by side. Pearson’s correlation coefficients measured the strength of the association between each pair of ICs on the basis of identified factors that could potentially affect efficacy findings. RESULTS: Some consistency in short-term PASI90 efficacy rankings was observed for certain drugs, although rankings for most drugs varied by IC. Factors potentially affecting efficacy outcomes included the use of different methodologies for head-to-head comparison and statistical analyses, and variation in drugs and classes included treatment dosing and duration, outcome definitions and effect measures reported between ICs. Considerable variation in these factors was found across all 26 ICs. Comparative safety information of value to physicians was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences were identified between ICs in factors that could potentially affect efficacy outcomes. Treatment rankings must be interpreted alongside actual differences in IC outcomes to allow conclusions on clinical relevance. Drugs within a class cannot be considered of equal efficacy: therapies should be considered individually rather than by class. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00765-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9357597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93575972022-08-10 The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings Augustin, Matthias Schuster, Christopher Mert, Can Nast, Alexander Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Review INTRODUCTION: It can be challenging for dermatologists to keep abreast of the growing evidence from published indirect comparisons (ICs) of treatments for psoriasis. The objective of this analysis was to summarise comparative clinical efficacy and safety findings from ICs of systemic biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and to identify factors potentially affecting efficacy outcomes and their possible implications for clinical decision making. METHODS: An umbrella review of short- and long-term efficacy and safety findings from 26 ICs visually compared 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI90) treatment rankings and three safety outcome rankings side by side. Pearson’s correlation coefficients measured the strength of the association between each pair of ICs on the basis of identified factors that could potentially affect efficacy findings. RESULTS: Some consistency in short-term PASI90 efficacy rankings was observed for certain drugs, although rankings for most drugs varied by IC. Factors potentially affecting efficacy outcomes included the use of different methodologies for head-to-head comparison and statistical analyses, and variation in drugs and classes included treatment dosing and duration, outcome definitions and effect measures reported between ICs. Considerable variation in these factors was found across all 26 ICs. Comparative safety information of value to physicians was limited. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences were identified between ICs in factors that could potentially affect efficacy outcomes. Treatment rankings must be interpreted alongside actual differences in IC outcomes to allow conclusions on clinical relevance. Drugs within a class cannot be considered of equal efficacy: therapies should be considered individually rather than by class. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00765-3. Springer Healthcare 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9357597/ /pubmed/35834062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00765-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Augustin, Matthias
Schuster, Christopher
Mert, Can
Nast, Alexander
The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings
title The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings
title_full The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings
title_fullStr The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings
title_short The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings
title_sort value of indirect comparisons of systemic biologics for psoriasis: interpretation of efficacy findings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35834062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-022-00765-3
work_keys_str_mv AT augustinmatthias thevalueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings
AT schusterchristopher thevalueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings
AT mertcan thevalueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings
AT nastalexander thevalueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings
AT augustinmatthias valueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings
AT schusterchristopher valueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings
AT mertcan valueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings
AT nastalexander valueofindirectcomparisonsofsystemicbiologicsforpsoriasisinterpretationofefficacyfindings