Cargando…
Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer
Gastric cancer (GC) is the 3rd leading cause of death from cancer and the 5th most common cancer worldwide. The detection rate of GC among Tibetans is significantly higher than that in Han Chinese, probably due to differences in their living habits, dietary structure, and environment. Despite such a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8266544 |
_version_ | 1784763764750417920 |
---|---|
author | Dhondrup, Rinchen Zhang, XiaoKang Feng, Xuemei Lobsang, Dhondrup Hua, Qincuo Liu, Junli Cuo, Ying Zhuoma, Sangji Duojie, Geri Duojie Caidan, Suonan Gyal, Samdrup |
author_facet | Dhondrup, Rinchen Zhang, XiaoKang Feng, Xuemei Lobsang, Dhondrup Hua, Qincuo Liu, Junli Cuo, Ying Zhuoma, Sangji Duojie, Geri Duojie Caidan, Suonan Gyal, Samdrup |
author_sort | Dhondrup, Rinchen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gastric cancer (GC) is the 3rd leading cause of death from cancer and the 5th most common cancer worldwide. The detection rate of GC among Tibetans is significantly higher than that in Han Chinese, probably due to differences in their living habits, dietary structure, and environment. Despite such a high disease burden, the epidemiology of gastric cancer has not been studied in this population. Molecular markers are required to aid the diagnosis and treatment of GC. In this study, we collected gastric tissue samples from patients in Tibet with chronic nonatrophic gastritis (CNAG) (n = 6), chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) (n = 7), gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) (n = 4), and GC (n = 5). The proteins in each group were analyzed using coupled label-free mass spectrometry. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment, and protein interaction networks were used to analyze the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) among groups. DEPs were quantified in comparisons of GC versus CNAG (223), GC versus GIN (100), and GIN versus CNAG (341). GO and KEGG analyses showed that the DEPs were mainly associated with immunity (GC versus CNAG) and cancer proliferation and metastasis (GC versus GIN, and GIN versus CNAG). Furthermore, the expression levels of cell proliferation and cytoskeleton-related proteins increased consistently during cancer development, such as ITGA4, DDC, and CPT1A; thus, they are potential diagnostic markers. These results obtained by proteomics analysis could improve our understanding of cancer biology in GC and provide a rich resource for data mining and discovering potential immunotherapy targets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9357686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93576862022-08-10 Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer Dhondrup, Rinchen Zhang, XiaoKang Feng, Xuemei Lobsang, Dhondrup Hua, Qincuo Liu, Junli Cuo, Ying Zhuoma, Sangji Duojie, Geri Duojie Caidan, Suonan Gyal, Samdrup Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Gastric cancer (GC) is the 3rd leading cause of death from cancer and the 5th most common cancer worldwide. The detection rate of GC among Tibetans is significantly higher than that in Han Chinese, probably due to differences in their living habits, dietary structure, and environment. Despite such a high disease burden, the epidemiology of gastric cancer has not been studied in this population. Molecular markers are required to aid the diagnosis and treatment of GC. In this study, we collected gastric tissue samples from patients in Tibet with chronic nonatrophic gastritis (CNAG) (n = 6), chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) (n = 7), gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) (n = 4), and GC (n = 5). The proteins in each group were analyzed using coupled label-free mass spectrometry. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment, and protein interaction networks were used to analyze the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) among groups. DEPs were quantified in comparisons of GC versus CNAG (223), GC versus GIN (100), and GIN versus CNAG (341). GO and KEGG analyses showed that the DEPs were mainly associated with immunity (GC versus CNAG) and cancer proliferation and metastasis (GC versus GIN, and GIN versus CNAG). Furthermore, the expression levels of cell proliferation and cytoskeleton-related proteins increased consistently during cancer development, such as ITGA4, DDC, and CPT1A; thus, they are potential diagnostic markers. These results obtained by proteomics analysis could improve our understanding of cancer biology in GC and provide a rich resource for data mining and discovering potential immunotherapy targets. Hindawi 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9357686/ /pubmed/35958927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8266544 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rinchen Dhondrup et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dhondrup, Rinchen Zhang, XiaoKang Feng, Xuemei Lobsang, Dhondrup Hua, Qincuo Liu, Junli Cuo, Ying Zhuoma, Sangji Duojie, Geri Duojie Caidan, Suonan Gyal, Samdrup Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer |
title | Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer |
title_full | Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer |
title_fullStr | Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer |
title_short | Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer |
title_sort | proteomic analysis reveals molecular differences in the development of gastric cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8266544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhondruprinchen proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT zhangxiaokang proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT fengxuemei proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT lobsangdhondrup proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT huaqincuo proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT liujunli proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT cuoying proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT zhuomasangji proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT duojiegeri proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT duojiecaidansuonan proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer AT gyalsamdrup proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer |