Cargando…

Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the 3rd leading cause of death from cancer and the 5th most common cancer worldwide. The detection rate of GC among Tibetans is significantly higher than that in Han Chinese, probably due to differences in their living habits, dietary structure, and environment. Despite such a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhondrup, Rinchen, Zhang, XiaoKang, Feng, Xuemei, Lobsang, Dhondrup, Hua, Qincuo, Liu, Junli, Cuo, Ying, Zhuoma, Sangji, Duojie, Geri, Duojie Caidan, Suonan, Gyal, Samdrup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8266544
_version_ 1784763764750417920
author Dhondrup, Rinchen
Zhang, XiaoKang
Feng, Xuemei
Lobsang, Dhondrup
Hua, Qincuo
Liu, Junli
Cuo, Ying
Zhuoma, Sangji
Duojie, Geri
Duojie Caidan, Suonan
Gyal, Samdrup
author_facet Dhondrup, Rinchen
Zhang, XiaoKang
Feng, Xuemei
Lobsang, Dhondrup
Hua, Qincuo
Liu, Junli
Cuo, Ying
Zhuoma, Sangji
Duojie, Geri
Duojie Caidan, Suonan
Gyal, Samdrup
author_sort Dhondrup, Rinchen
collection PubMed
description Gastric cancer (GC) is the 3rd leading cause of death from cancer and the 5th most common cancer worldwide. The detection rate of GC among Tibetans is significantly higher than that in Han Chinese, probably due to differences in their living habits, dietary structure, and environment. Despite such a high disease burden, the epidemiology of gastric cancer has not been studied in this population. Molecular markers are required to aid the diagnosis and treatment of GC. In this study, we collected gastric tissue samples from patients in Tibet with chronic nonatrophic gastritis (CNAG) (n = 6), chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) (n = 7), gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) (n = 4), and GC (n = 5). The proteins in each group were analyzed using coupled label-free mass spectrometry. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment, and protein interaction networks were used to analyze the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) among groups. DEPs were quantified in comparisons of GC versus CNAG (223), GC versus GIN (100), and GIN versus CNAG (341). GO and KEGG analyses showed that the DEPs were mainly associated with immunity (GC versus CNAG) and cancer proliferation and metastasis (GC versus GIN, and GIN versus CNAG). Furthermore, the expression levels of cell proliferation and cytoskeleton-related proteins increased consistently during cancer development, such as ITGA4, DDC, and CPT1A; thus, they are potential diagnostic markers. These results obtained by proteomics analysis could improve our understanding of cancer biology in GC and provide a rich resource for data mining and discovering potential immunotherapy targets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9357686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93576862022-08-10 Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer Dhondrup, Rinchen Zhang, XiaoKang Feng, Xuemei Lobsang, Dhondrup Hua, Qincuo Liu, Junli Cuo, Ying Zhuoma, Sangji Duojie, Geri Duojie Caidan, Suonan Gyal, Samdrup Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Gastric cancer (GC) is the 3rd leading cause of death from cancer and the 5th most common cancer worldwide. The detection rate of GC among Tibetans is significantly higher than that in Han Chinese, probably due to differences in their living habits, dietary structure, and environment. Despite such a high disease burden, the epidemiology of gastric cancer has not been studied in this population. Molecular markers are required to aid the diagnosis and treatment of GC. In this study, we collected gastric tissue samples from patients in Tibet with chronic nonatrophic gastritis (CNAG) (n = 6), chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) (n = 7), gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) (n = 4), and GC (n = 5). The proteins in each group were analyzed using coupled label-free mass spectrometry. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment, and protein interaction networks were used to analyze the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) among groups. DEPs were quantified in comparisons of GC versus CNAG (223), GC versus GIN (100), and GIN versus CNAG (341). GO and KEGG analyses showed that the DEPs were mainly associated with immunity (GC versus CNAG) and cancer proliferation and metastasis (GC versus GIN, and GIN versus CNAG). Furthermore, the expression levels of cell proliferation and cytoskeleton-related proteins increased consistently during cancer development, such as ITGA4, DDC, and CPT1A; thus, they are potential diagnostic markers. These results obtained by proteomics analysis could improve our understanding of cancer biology in GC and provide a rich resource for data mining and discovering potential immunotherapy targets. Hindawi 2022-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9357686/ /pubmed/35958927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8266544 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rinchen Dhondrup et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dhondrup, Rinchen
Zhang, XiaoKang
Feng, Xuemei
Lobsang, Dhondrup
Hua, Qincuo
Liu, Junli
Cuo, Ying
Zhuoma, Sangji
Duojie, Geri
Duojie Caidan, Suonan
Gyal, Samdrup
Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer
title Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer
title_full Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer
title_short Proteomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Differences in the Development of Gastric Cancer
title_sort proteomic analysis reveals molecular differences in the development of gastric cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8266544
work_keys_str_mv AT dhondruprinchen proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT zhangxiaokang proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT fengxuemei proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT lobsangdhondrup proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT huaqincuo proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT liujunli proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT cuoying proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT zhuomasangji proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT duojiegeri proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT duojiecaidansuonan proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer
AT gyalsamdrup proteomicanalysisrevealsmoleculardifferencesinthedevelopmentofgastriccancer