Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) versus other forms of spine surgery. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched up to February 2022. The authors used Review Manager 5.3 to manage the data and perform the review....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.911914 |
_version_ | 1784763812457480192 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Bin Xu, Shuai Guo, Chen Jin, Linyu Liu, Chenjun Liu, Haiying |
author_facet | Zheng, Bin Xu, Shuai Guo, Chen Jin, Linyu Liu, Chenjun Liu, Haiying |
author_sort | Zheng, Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) versus other forms of spine surgery. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched up to February 2022. The authors used Review Manager 5.3 to manage the data and perform the review. RESULTS: After the preliminary selection of 239 studies from electronic databases, the full inclusion criteria were applied; 16 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion. These 16 studies enrolled 1,488 patients: 653 patients in the UBE group, 570 in the microendoscopic discectomy group, 153 in the percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy group, and 70 in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group. UBE was superior to microendoscopic discectomy regarding 1-day Visual Analog Scale(VAS) back pain scores (P < 0.00001). No difference was found between UBE and microendoscopic discectomy regarding 1-day Visual Analog Scale leg pain scores (P = 0.25), long-term VAS back pain scores (P = 0.06), long-term VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.05), Oswestry Disability Index scores (P = 0.09) or complications (P = 0.19). Pooled analysis indicated that UBE was similar to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy regarding 1-day VAS back pain scores (P = 0.71), 1-day VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.37), long-term VAS back pain scores (P = 0.75), long-term VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.41), Oswestry Disability Index scores (P = 0.07) and complications (P = 0.88). One study reported no difference between UBE and posterior lumbar interbody fusion regarding long-term VAS back pain, long-term VAS leg pain, or Oswestry Disability Index scores. CONCLUSIONS: UBE is superior to microendoscopic discectomy to relieve back pain 1 day postoperatively. However, these two procedures are similar regarding 1-day leg pain relief, long-term effects, and safety. UBE and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy are similar regarding 1-day pain relief, long-term effects and safety. More evidence is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UBE versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9357908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93579082022-08-10 Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Zheng, Bin Xu, Shuai Guo, Chen Jin, Linyu Liu, Chenjun Liu, Haiying Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) versus other forms of spine surgery. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched up to February 2022. The authors used Review Manager 5.3 to manage the data and perform the review. RESULTS: After the preliminary selection of 239 studies from electronic databases, the full inclusion criteria were applied; 16 studies were found to be eligible for inclusion. These 16 studies enrolled 1,488 patients: 653 patients in the UBE group, 570 in the microendoscopic discectomy group, 153 in the percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy group, and 70 in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group. UBE was superior to microendoscopic discectomy regarding 1-day Visual Analog Scale(VAS) back pain scores (P < 0.00001). No difference was found between UBE and microendoscopic discectomy regarding 1-day Visual Analog Scale leg pain scores (P = 0.25), long-term VAS back pain scores (P = 0.06), long-term VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.05), Oswestry Disability Index scores (P = 0.09) or complications (P = 0.19). Pooled analysis indicated that UBE was similar to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy regarding 1-day VAS back pain scores (P = 0.71), 1-day VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.37), long-term VAS back pain scores (P = 0.75), long-term VAS leg pain scores (P = 0.41), Oswestry Disability Index scores (P = 0.07) and complications (P = 0.88). One study reported no difference between UBE and posterior lumbar interbody fusion regarding long-term VAS back pain, long-term VAS leg pain, or Oswestry Disability Index scores. CONCLUSIONS: UBE is superior to microendoscopic discectomy to relieve back pain 1 day postoperatively. However, these two procedures are similar regarding 1-day leg pain relief, long-term effects, and safety. UBE and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy are similar regarding 1-day pain relief, long-term effects and safety. More evidence is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UBE versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9357908/ /pubmed/35959116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.911914 Text en © 2022 Zheng, Xu, Guo, Jin, Liu and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Zheng, Bin Xu, Shuai Guo, Chen Jin, Linyu Liu, Chenjun Liu, Haiying Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.911914 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengbin efficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyversusotherspinesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xushuai efficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyversusotherspinesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guochen efficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyversusotherspinesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinlinyu efficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyversusotherspinesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuchenjun efficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyversusotherspinesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuhaiying efficacyandsafetyofunilateralbiportalendoscopyversusotherspinesurgeryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |