Cargando…
Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients
BACKGROUND: Concomitant replacement of the aortic root and aortic valve is a widely used treatment strategy in elective patients with aortic valve stenosis and root aneurysm. It is also a strategy frequently employed in patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), involving the aortic root....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958530 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/acs-2022-bav-67 |
_version_ | 1784763825693655040 |
---|---|
author | Haunschild, Josephina Dietze, Zara van Kampen, Antonia Magomedov, Khadzhimurad Misfeld, Martin Leontyev, Sergey Borger, Michael A. Etz, Christian D. |
author_facet | Haunschild, Josephina Dietze, Zara van Kampen, Antonia Magomedov, Khadzhimurad Misfeld, Martin Leontyev, Sergey Borger, Michael A. Etz, Christian D. |
author_sort | Haunschild, Josephina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Concomitant replacement of the aortic root and aortic valve is a widely used treatment strategy in elective patients with aortic valve stenosis and root aneurysm. It is also a strategy frequently employed in patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), involving the aortic root. Although more patients have undergone valve sparing procedures over the past decades, the classic ‘modified Bentall technique’ remains a valid option, particularly for patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We aimed to compare the results of elective and emergency modified Bentall procedures in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing either elective or emergency modified Bentall procedures between 2000 and 2018 and identified 827 elective cases (44% BAV) and 258 emergency cases (15% BAV). Analysis of intra- and postoperative outcomes and early mortality was performed. Due to inequality of the groups, a matching analysis was performed. RESULTS: We found BAV patients to be significantly younger (elective: 58±18 vs. 65±14, P<0.001; emergency: 49±17 vs. 62±19, P<0.001) and healthier at time of surgery. In the AADA cohort, malperfusion rate was not different between bicuspid and tricuspid patients, however bicuspid AADA patients presented more often with an entry in the aortic root. After matching, procedure times and early outcomes did not differ between the groups, except for significantly higher rates of respiratory failure in elective TAV patients (10% vs. 5%, P=0.033). The 30-day mortality was 2% in elective cases and 22% in emergency AADA surgery. A subgroup analysis of elective patients with aortic diameter <55 mm also showed excellent outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for preoperative inequalities, no differences in early mortality and outcomes were found between bicuspid and tricuspid patients receiving elective or emergency modified Bentall surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9357961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93579612022-08-10 Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients Haunschild, Josephina Dietze, Zara van Kampen, Antonia Magomedov, Khadzhimurad Misfeld, Martin Leontyev, Sergey Borger, Michael A. Etz, Christian D. Ann Cardiothorac Surg Featured Article BACKGROUND: Concomitant replacement of the aortic root and aortic valve is a widely used treatment strategy in elective patients with aortic valve stenosis and root aneurysm. It is also a strategy frequently employed in patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), involving the aortic root. Although more patients have undergone valve sparing procedures over the past decades, the classic ‘modified Bentall technique’ remains a valid option, particularly for patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). We aimed to compare the results of elective and emergency modified Bentall procedures in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our database for patients undergoing either elective or emergency modified Bentall procedures between 2000 and 2018 and identified 827 elective cases (44% BAV) and 258 emergency cases (15% BAV). Analysis of intra- and postoperative outcomes and early mortality was performed. Due to inequality of the groups, a matching analysis was performed. RESULTS: We found BAV patients to be significantly younger (elective: 58±18 vs. 65±14, P<0.001; emergency: 49±17 vs. 62±19, P<0.001) and healthier at time of surgery. In the AADA cohort, malperfusion rate was not different between bicuspid and tricuspid patients, however bicuspid AADA patients presented more often with an entry in the aortic root. After matching, procedure times and early outcomes did not differ between the groups, except for significantly higher rates of respiratory failure in elective TAV patients (10% vs. 5%, P=0.033). The 30-day mortality was 2% in elective cases and 22% in emergency AADA surgery. A subgroup analysis of elective patients with aortic diameter <55 mm also showed excellent outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for preoperative inequalities, no differences in early mortality and outcomes were found between bicuspid and tricuspid patients receiving elective or emergency modified Bentall surgery. AME Publishing Company 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9357961/ /pubmed/35958530 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/acs-2022-bav-67 Text en 2022 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Featured Article Haunschild, Josephina Dietze, Zara van Kampen, Antonia Magomedov, Khadzhimurad Misfeld, Martin Leontyev, Sergey Borger, Michael A. Etz, Christian D. Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients |
title | Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients |
title_full | Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients |
title_fullStr | Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients |
title_short | Aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients |
title_sort | aortic root replacement in bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve patients |
topic | Featured Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9357961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35958530 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/acs-2022-bav-67 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haunschildjosephina aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients AT dietzezara aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients AT vankampenantonia aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients AT magomedovkhadzhimurad aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients AT misfeldmartin aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients AT leontyevsergey aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients AT borgermichaela aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients AT etzchristiand aorticrootreplacementinbicuspidversustricuspidaorticvalvepatients |