Cargando…

Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility

PURPOSE: We examined different methods to reduce the burden of accessing technology for videoconferencing during telerehabilitation for magnification devices for the visually impaired. METHODS: During telerehabilitation studies over the past 5 years, vision rehabilitation providers assessed and gave...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bittner, Ava K., Yoshinaga, Patrick D., Shepherd, John D., Kaminski, John E., Malkin, Alexis G., Chun, Melissa W., Chan, Tiffany L., Deemer, Ashley D., Ross, Nicole C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35917136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.8.4
_version_ 1784763899791278080
author Bittner, Ava K.
Yoshinaga, Patrick D.
Shepherd, John D.
Kaminski, John E.
Malkin, Alexis G.
Chun, Melissa W.
Chan, Tiffany L.
Deemer, Ashley D.
Ross, Nicole C.
author_facet Bittner, Ava K.
Yoshinaga, Patrick D.
Shepherd, John D.
Kaminski, John E.
Malkin, Alexis G.
Chun, Melissa W.
Chan, Tiffany L.
Deemer, Ashley D.
Ross, Nicole C.
author_sort Bittner, Ava K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We examined different methods to reduce the burden of accessing technology for videoconferencing during telerehabilitation for magnification devices for the visually impaired. METHODS: During telerehabilitation studies over the past 5 years, vision rehabilitation providers assessed and gave training to visually impaired participants with newly dispensed magnification devices at home who connected to Zoom videoconferencing via loaner tablets or smartphones with assistance from (phase 1; n = 10) investigators by phone, (phase 2; n = 11) local Lions Club volunteers in participants’ homes, or (phase 3; n = 24) remote access control software in a randomized controlled trial with 13 usual care controls who received in-office training. All participants completed the same post-telerehabilitation phone survey. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of phase 3 subjects indicated they strongly or mostly agreed that the technology did not interfere with the session (96%) compared to phase 1 (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–12.5; P = 0.03) or phase 2 (55%; 95% CI, 1.8–188; P = 0.01). The majority indicated telerehabilitation was as accurate as in person (68%), they were comfortable with telerehabilitation (91%) and interested in a future session (83%), and their magnifier use improved (79%), with no significant differences in these responses between phases (all P > 0.10), including comparisons of participants randomized to telerehabilitation or in-office training in phase 3 who reported similar overall satisfaction levels (P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Participants across all phases reported high levels of acceptance for telerehabilitation, with least interference from technology using remote access control in phase 3. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: With accommodations for accessibility to videoconferencing technology, telerehabilitation for magnification devices can be a feasible, acceptable, and valuable option in countries with resources to support the technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9358294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93582942022-08-10 Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility Bittner, Ava K. Yoshinaga, Patrick D. Shepherd, John D. Kaminski, John E. Malkin, Alexis G. Chun, Melissa W. Chan, Tiffany L. Deemer, Ashley D. Ross, Nicole C. Transl Vis Sci Technol Telemedicine PURPOSE: We examined different methods to reduce the burden of accessing technology for videoconferencing during telerehabilitation for magnification devices for the visually impaired. METHODS: During telerehabilitation studies over the past 5 years, vision rehabilitation providers assessed and gave training to visually impaired participants with newly dispensed magnification devices at home who connected to Zoom videoconferencing via loaner tablets or smartphones with assistance from (phase 1; n = 10) investigators by phone, (phase 2; n = 11) local Lions Club volunteers in participants’ homes, or (phase 3; n = 24) remote access control software in a randomized controlled trial with 13 usual care controls who received in-office training. All participants completed the same post-telerehabilitation phone survey. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of phase 3 subjects indicated they strongly or mostly agreed that the technology did not interfere with the session (96%) compared to phase 1 (60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–12.5; P = 0.03) or phase 2 (55%; 95% CI, 1.8–188; P = 0.01). The majority indicated telerehabilitation was as accurate as in person (68%), they were comfortable with telerehabilitation (91%) and interested in a future session (83%), and their magnifier use improved (79%), with no significant differences in these responses between phases (all P > 0.10), including comparisons of participants randomized to telerehabilitation or in-office training in phase 3 who reported similar overall satisfaction levels (P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Participants across all phases reported high levels of acceptance for telerehabilitation, with least interference from technology using remote access control in phase 3. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: With accommodations for accessibility to videoconferencing technology, telerehabilitation for magnification devices can be a feasible, acceptable, and valuable option in countries with resources to support the technology. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9358294/ /pubmed/35917136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.8.4 Text en Copyright 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Telemedicine
Bittner, Ava K.
Yoshinaga, Patrick D.
Shepherd, John D.
Kaminski, John E.
Malkin, Alexis G.
Chun, Melissa W.
Chan, Tiffany L.
Deemer, Ashley D.
Ross, Nicole C.
Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility
title Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility
title_full Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility
title_fullStr Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility
title_short Acceptability of Telerehabilitation for Magnification Devices for the Visually Impaired Using Various Approaches to Facilitate Accessibility
title_sort acceptability of telerehabilitation for magnification devices for the visually impaired using various approaches to facilitate accessibility
topic Telemedicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35917136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.8.4
work_keys_str_mv AT bittneravak acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT yoshinagapatrickd acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT shepherdjohnd acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT kaminskijohne acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT malkinalexisg acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT chunmelissaw acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT chantiffanyl acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT deemerashleyd acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT rossnicolec acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility
AT acceptabilityoftelerehabilitationformagnificationdevicesforthevisuallyimpairedusingvariousapproachestofacilitateaccessibility