Cargando…
Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury
Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the hippocampus is proposed for enhancement of memory impaired by injury or disease. Many pre-clinical DBS paradigms can be addressed in epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial monitoring for seizure localization, since they already have electrodes implan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.933401 |
_version_ | 1784764004708646912 |
---|---|
author | Roeder, Brent M. Riley, Mitchell R. She, Xiwei Dakos, Alexander S. Robinson, Brian S. Moore, Bryan J. Couture, Daniel E. Laxton, Adrian W. Popli, Gautam Munger Clary, Heidi M. Sam, Maria Heck, Christi Nune, George Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Shaw, Susan Gong, Hui Marmarelis, Vasilis Z. Berger, Theodore W. Deadwyler, Sam A. Song, Dong Hampson, Robert E. |
author_facet | Roeder, Brent M. Riley, Mitchell R. She, Xiwei Dakos, Alexander S. Robinson, Brian S. Moore, Bryan J. Couture, Daniel E. Laxton, Adrian W. Popli, Gautam Munger Clary, Heidi M. Sam, Maria Heck, Christi Nune, George Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Shaw, Susan Gong, Hui Marmarelis, Vasilis Z. Berger, Theodore W. Deadwyler, Sam A. Song, Dong Hampson, Robert E. |
author_sort | Roeder, Brent M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the hippocampus is proposed for enhancement of memory impaired by injury or disease. Many pre-clinical DBS paradigms can be addressed in epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial monitoring for seizure localization, since they already have electrodes implanted in brain areas of interest. Even though epilepsy is usually not a memory disorder targeted by DBS, the studies can nevertheless model other memory-impacting disorders, such as Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Methods: Human patients undergoing Phase II invasive monitoring for intractable epilepsy were implanted with depth electrodes capable of recording neurophysiological signals. Subjects performed a delayed-match-to-sample (DMS) memory task while hippocampal ensembles from CA1 and CA3 cell layers were recorded to estimate a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) model of CA3-to-CA1 neural encoding and a memory decoding model (MDM) to decode memory information from CA3 and CA1 neuronal signals. After model estimation, subjects again performed the DMS task while either MIMO-based or MDM-based patterned stimulation was delivered to CA1 electrode sites during the encoding phase of the DMS trials. Each subject was sorted (post hoc) by prior experience of repeated and/or mild-to-moderate brain injury (RMBI), TBI, or no history (control) and scored for percentage successful delayed recognition (DR) recall on stimulated vs. non-stimulated DMS trials. The subject’s medical history was unknown to the experimenters until after individual subject memory retention results were scored. Results: When examined compared to control subjects, both TBI and RMBI subjects showed increased memory retention in response to both MIMO and MDM-based hippocampal stimulation. Furthermore, effects of stimulation were also greater in subjects who were evaluated as having pre-existing mild-to-moderate memory impairment. Conclusion: These results show that hippocampal stimulation for memory facilitation was more beneficial for subjects who had previously suffered a brain injury (other than epilepsy), compared to control (epilepsy) subjects who had not suffered a brain injury. This study demonstrates that the epilepsy/intracranial recording model can be extended to test the ability of DBS to restore memory function in subjects who previously suffered a brain injury other than epilepsy, and support further investigation into the beneficial effect of DBS in TBI patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9358788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93587882022-08-10 Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury Roeder, Brent M. Riley, Mitchell R. She, Xiwei Dakos, Alexander S. Robinson, Brian S. Moore, Bryan J. Couture, Daniel E. Laxton, Adrian W. Popli, Gautam Munger Clary, Heidi M. Sam, Maria Heck, Christi Nune, George Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Shaw, Susan Gong, Hui Marmarelis, Vasilis Z. Berger, Theodore W. Deadwyler, Sam A. Song, Dong Hampson, Robert E. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the hippocampus is proposed for enhancement of memory impaired by injury or disease. Many pre-clinical DBS paradigms can be addressed in epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial monitoring for seizure localization, since they already have electrodes implanted in brain areas of interest. Even though epilepsy is usually not a memory disorder targeted by DBS, the studies can nevertheless model other memory-impacting disorders, such as Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Methods: Human patients undergoing Phase II invasive monitoring for intractable epilepsy were implanted with depth electrodes capable of recording neurophysiological signals. Subjects performed a delayed-match-to-sample (DMS) memory task while hippocampal ensembles from CA1 and CA3 cell layers were recorded to estimate a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) model of CA3-to-CA1 neural encoding and a memory decoding model (MDM) to decode memory information from CA3 and CA1 neuronal signals. After model estimation, subjects again performed the DMS task while either MIMO-based or MDM-based patterned stimulation was delivered to CA1 electrode sites during the encoding phase of the DMS trials. Each subject was sorted (post hoc) by prior experience of repeated and/or mild-to-moderate brain injury (RMBI), TBI, or no history (control) and scored for percentage successful delayed recognition (DR) recall on stimulated vs. non-stimulated DMS trials. The subject’s medical history was unknown to the experimenters until after individual subject memory retention results were scored. Results: When examined compared to control subjects, both TBI and RMBI subjects showed increased memory retention in response to both MIMO and MDM-based hippocampal stimulation. Furthermore, effects of stimulation were also greater in subjects who were evaluated as having pre-existing mild-to-moderate memory impairment. Conclusion: These results show that hippocampal stimulation for memory facilitation was more beneficial for subjects who had previously suffered a brain injury (other than epilepsy), compared to control (epilepsy) subjects who had not suffered a brain injury. This study demonstrates that the epilepsy/intracranial recording model can be extended to test the ability of DBS to restore memory function in subjects who previously suffered a brain injury other than epilepsy, and support further investigation into the beneficial effect of DBS in TBI patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9358788/ /pubmed/35959242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.933401 Text en Copyright © 2022 Roeder, Riley, She, Dakos, Robinson, Moore, Couture, Laxton, Popli, Munger Clary, Sam, Heck, Nune, Lee, Liu, Shaw, Gong, Marmarelis, Berger, Deadwyler, Song and Hampson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Roeder, Brent M. Riley, Mitchell R. She, Xiwei Dakos, Alexander S. Robinson, Brian S. Moore, Bryan J. Couture, Daniel E. Laxton, Adrian W. Popli, Gautam Munger Clary, Heidi M. Sam, Maria Heck, Christi Nune, George Lee, Brian Liu, Charles Shaw, Susan Gong, Hui Marmarelis, Vasilis Z. Berger, Theodore W. Deadwyler, Sam A. Song, Dong Hampson, Robert E. Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury |
title | Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury |
title_full | Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury |
title_fullStr | Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury |
title_full_unstemmed | Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury |
title_short | Patterned Hippocampal Stimulation Facilitates Memory in Patients With a History of Head Impact and/or Brain Injury |
title_sort | patterned hippocampal stimulation facilitates memory in patients with a history of head impact and/or brain injury |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35959242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.933401 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roederbrentm patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT rileymitchellr patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT shexiwei patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT dakosalexanders patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT robinsonbrians patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT moorebryanj patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT couturedaniele patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT laxtonadrianw patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT popligautam patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT mungerclaryheidim patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT sammaria patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT heckchristi patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT nunegeorge patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT leebrian patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT liucharles patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT shawsusan patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT gonghui patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT marmarelisvasilisz patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT bergertheodorew patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT deadwylersama patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT songdong patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury AT hampsonroberte patternedhippocampalstimulationfacilitatesmemoryinpatientswithahistoryofheadimpactandorbraininjury |