Cargando…

Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study

PURPOSE: Using real-world evidence, this study aimed to identify elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who would benefit from chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 1714 elderly NPC patients between April 2007 and December 2017 were identified. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yan-Ling, Yang, Kai-Bin, Huang, Ying, Shi, Jing-Rong, He, Qing-Shui, Chen, Lei, Li, Wen-Fei, Huang, Xiao-Dan, Lin, Li, Chen, Yu-Pei, Mao, Yan-Ping, Tang, Ling-Long, Ma, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02095-2
_version_ 1784764012330745856
author Wu, Yan-Ling
Yang, Kai-Bin
Huang, Ying
Shi, Jing-Rong
He, Qing-Shui
Chen, Lei
Li, Wen-Fei
Huang, Xiao-Dan
Lin, Li
Chen, Yu-Pei
Mao, Yan-Ping
Tang, Ling-Long
Ma, Jun
author_facet Wu, Yan-Ling
Yang, Kai-Bin
Huang, Ying
Shi, Jing-Rong
He, Qing-Shui
Chen, Lei
Li, Wen-Fei
Huang, Xiao-Dan
Lin, Li
Chen, Yu-Pei
Mao, Yan-Ping
Tang, Ling-Long
Ma, Jun
author_sort Wu, Yan-Ling
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Using real-world evidence, this study aimed to identify elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who would benefit from chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 1714 elderly NPC patients between April 2007 and December 2017 were identified. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to generate risk-stratified outcomes. Prognostic factors were performed for individual comparisons of different risk groups to assess chemotherapy benefits. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59.3 (0.39–170.09) months. Epstein Barr virus (EBV) DNA and T stage were included in the RPA-generated risk stratification, categorizing patients into a good-prognosis group (EBV DNA ≤ 4000 copies/mL & T1–2), and a poor-prognosis group (EBV DNA ≤ 4000 copies/mL & T3–4 and EBV DNA > 4000 copies/mL & any T). Overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the good-prognosis group compared with the training set (HR = 0.309, 95% CI 0.184–0.517; P < 0.001), and validated in the testing set (HR = 0.276, 95% CI 0.113–0.670; P = 0.002). In the poor-prognosis group, a significantly improved OS for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with RT alone was observed (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.88; P = 0.003). Patients who received induction chemotherapy (IC) + concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT had a significantly improved OS compared with RT alone (IC + CCRT vs. RT alone: P = 0.002; CCRT vs. RT alone: P = 0.008) but not in the IC + RT group (P = 0.306). The 5-year OS for CRT versus RT-alone with ACE-27 scores of 0, 1 and 2 were 76.0% versus 70.0% (P = 0.014), 80.5% versus 68.2% (P = 0.150) and 58.5% versus 62.2% (P = 0.490), respectively; for those aged 60–64, 65–70 and ≥ 70 years old they were 80.9% versus 75.9% (P = 0.068), 73.3% versus 63.4% (P = 0.270) and 64.8% versus 67.1% (P = 0.820), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For elderly NPC patients a simple screening cutoff for chemotherapy beneficiaries might be EBV DNA < 4000 copies/ml & T3–4 and EBV DNA ≥ 4000 copies/ml & any T, but not for those > 70 years old and with an ACE-27 score > 1. IC + CCRT and CCRT were effective forms of chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02095-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9358823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93588232022-08-10 Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study Wu, Yan-Ling Yang, Kai-Bin Huang, Ying Shi, Jing-Rong He, Qing-Shui Chen, Lei Li, Wen-Fei Huang, Xiao-Dan Lin, Li Chen, Yu-Pei Mao, Yan-Ping Tang, Ling-Long Ma, Jun Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: Using real-world evidence, this study aimed to identify elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who would benefit from chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 1714 elderly NPC patients between April 2007 and December 2017 were identified. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to generate risk-stratified outcomes. Prognostic factors were performed for individual comparisons of different risk groups to assess chemotherapy benefits. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59.3 (0.39–170.09) months. Epstein Barr virus (EBV) DNA and T stage were included in the RPA-generated risk stratification, categorizing patients into a good-prognosis group (EBV DNA ≤ 4000 copies/mL & T1–2), and a poor-prognosis group (EBV DNA ≤ 4000 copies/mL & T3–4 and EBV DNA > 4000 copies/mL & any T). Overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in the good-prognosis group compared with the training set (HR = 0.309, 95% CI 0.184–0.517; P < 0.001), and validated in the testing set (HR = 0.276, 95% CI 0.113–0.670; P = 0.002). In the poor-prognosis group, a significantly improved OS for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with RT alone was observed (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.88; P = 0.003). Patients who received induction chemotherapy (IC) + concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and CCRT had a significantly improved OS compared with RT alone (IC + CCRT vs. RT alone: P = 0.002; CCRT vs. RT alone: P = 0.008) but not in the IC + RT group (P = 0.306). The 5-year OS for CRT versus RT-alone with ACE-27 scores of 0, 1 and 2 were 76.0% versus 70.0% (P = 0.014), 80.5% versus 68.2% (P = 0.150) and 58.5% versus 62.2% (P = 0.490), respectively; for those aged 60–64, 65–70 and ≥ 70 years old they were 80.9% versus 75.9% (P = 0.068), 73.3% versus 63.4% (P = 0.270) and 64.8% versus 67.1% (P = 0.820), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For elderly NPC patients a simple screening cutoff for chemotherapy beneficiaries might be EBV DNA < 4000 copies/ml & T3–4 and EBV DNA ≥ 4000 copies/ml & any T, but not for those > 70 years old and with an ACE-27 score > 1. IC + CCRT and CCRT were effective forms of chemotherapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02095-2. BioMed Central 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9358823/ /pubmed/35941674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02095-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wu, Yan-Ling
Yang, Kai-Bin
Huang, Ying
Shi, Jing-Rong
He, Qing-Shui
Chen, Lei
Li, Wen-Fei
Huang, Xiao-Dan
Lin, Li
Chen, Yu-Pei
Mao, Yan-Ping
Tang, Ling-Long
Ma, Jun
Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study
title Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study
title_full Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study
title_fullStr Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study
title_full_unstemmed Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study
title_short Selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a large real-world study
title_sort selection and validation of chemotherapy beneficiaries among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (npc) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (imrt): a large real-world study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02095-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyanling selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT yangkaibin selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT huangying selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT shijingrong selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT heqingshui selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT chenlei selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT liwenfei selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT huangxiaodan selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT linli selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT chenyupei selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT maoyanping selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT tanglinglong selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy
AT majun selectionandvalidationofchemotherapybeneficiariesamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomanpcpatientstreatedwithintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtalargerealworldstudy