Cargando…

Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review

BACKGROUND: To measure the specific effectiveness of a given treatment in a randomised controlled trial, the intervention and control groups have to be similar in all factors not distinctive to the experimental treatment. The similarity of these non-specific factors can be defined as an equality ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giandomenico, D.’Alessandro, Nuria, Ruffini, Alessandro, Aquino, Matteo, Galli, Mattia, Innocenti, Marco, Tramontano, Francesco, Cerritelli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8
_version_ 1784764024427118592
author Giandomenico, D.’Alessandro
Nuria, Ruffini
Alessandro, Aquino
Matteo, Galli
Mattia, Innocenti
Marco, Tramontano
Francesco, Cerritelli
author_facet Giandomenico, D.’Alessandro
Nuria, Ruffini
Alessandro, Aquino
Matteo, Galli
Mattia, Innocenti
Marco, Tramontano
Francesco, Cerritelli
author_sort Giandomenico, D.’Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To measure the specific effectiveness of a given treatment in a randomised controlled trial, the intervention and control groups have to be similar in all factors not distinctive to the experimental treatment. The similarity of these non-specific factors can be defined as an equality assumption. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the equality assumptions in manual therapy trials. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified through the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, Scholar Google, clinicaltrial.gov, the Cochrane Library, chiloras/MANTIS, PubMed Europe, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Sciencedirect. Studies investigating the effect of any manual intervention compared to at least one type of manual control were included. Data extraction and qualitative assessment were carried out independently by four reviewers, and the summary of results was reported following the PRISMA statement. RESULT: Out of 108,903 retrieved studies, 311, enrolling a total of 17,308 patients, were included and divided into eight manual therapy trials categories. Equality assumption elements were grouped in three macro areas: patient-related, context-related and practitioner-related items. Results showed good quality in the reporting of context-related equality assumption items, potentially because largely included in pre-existent guidelines. There was a general lack of attention to the patient- and practitioner-related equality assumption items. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the similarity between experimental and sham interventions is limited, affecting, therefore, the strength of the evidence. Based on the results, methodological aspects for planning future trials were discussed and recommendations to control for equality assumption were provided. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9358888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93588882022-08-10 Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review Giandomenico, D.’Alessandro Nuria, Ruffini Alessandro, Aquino Matteo, Galli Mattia, Innocenti Marco, Tramontano Francesco, Cerritelli BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: To measure the specific effectiveness of a given treatment in a randomised controlled trial, the intervention and control groups have to be similar in all factors not distinctive to the experimental treatment. The similarity of these non-specific factors can be defined as an equality assumption. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the equality assumptions in manual therapy trials. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified through the following databases: EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, Scholar Google, clinicaltrial.gov, the Cochrane Library, chiloras/MANTIS, PubMed Europe, Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Sciencedirect. Studies investigating the effect of any manual intervention compared to at least one type of manual control were included. Data extraction and qualitative assessment were carried out independently by four reviewers, and the summary of results was reported following the PRISMA statement. RESULT: Out of 108,903 retrieved studies, 311, enrolling a total of 17,308 patients, were included and divided into eight manual therapy trials categories. Equality assumption elements were grouped in three macro areas: patient-related, context-related and practitioner-related items. Results showed good quality in the reporting of context-related equality assumption items, potentially because largely included in pre-existent guidelines. There was a general lack of attention to the patient- and practitioner-related equality assumption items. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the similarity between experimental and sham interventions is limited, affecting, therefore, the strength of the evidence. Based on the results, methodological aspects for planning future trials were discussed and recommendations to control for equality assumption were provided. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8. BioMed Central 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9358888/ /pubmed/35941533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Giandomenico, D.’Alessandro
Nuria, Ruffini
Alessandro, Aquino
Matteo, Galli
Mattia, Innocenti
Marco, Tramontano
Francesco, Cerritelli
Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
title Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
title_full Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
title_fullStr Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
title_full_unstemmed Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
title_short Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
title_sort differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35941533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8
work_keys_str_mv AT giandomenicodalessandro differencesbetweenexperimentalandplaceboarmsinmanualtherapytrialsamethodologicalreview
AT nuriaruffini differencesbetweenexperimentalandplaceboarmsinmanualtherapytrialsamethodologicalreview
AT alessandroaquino differencesbetweenexperimentalandplaceboarmsinmanualtherapytrialsamethodologicalreview
AT matteogalli differencesbetweenexperimentalandplaceboarmsinmanualtherapytrialsamethodologicalreview
AT mattiainnocenti differencesbetweenexperimentalandplaceboarmsinmanualtherapytrialsamethodologicalreview
AT marcotramontano differencesbetweenexperimentalandplaceboarmsinmanualtherapytrialsamethodologicalreview
AT francescocerritelli differencesbetweenexperimentalandplaceboarmsinmanualtherapytrialsamethodologicalreview