Cargando…

Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: Behaviour change interventions targeting changes in physical activity (PA) can benefit by examining the underlying mechanisms that promote change. This study explored the use of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrett, Stephen, Begg, Stephen, O'Halloran, Paul, Breckon, Jeff, Rodda, Kane, Barrett, Gabrielle, Kingsley, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057855
_version_ 1784764034788098048
author Barrett, Stephen
Begg, Stephen
O'Halloran, Paul
Breckon, Jeff
Rodda, Kane
Barrett, Gabrielle
Kingsley, Michael
author_facet Barrett, Stephen
Begg, Stephen
O'Halloran, Paul
Breckon, Jeff
Rodda, Kane
Barrett, Gabrielle
Kingsley, Michael
author_sort Barrett, Stephen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Behaviour change interventions targeting changes in physical activity (PA) can benefit by examining the underlying mechanisms that promote change. This study explored the use of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to code and contextualise the experiences of participants who completed a PA coaching intervention underpinned by motivational interviewing and cognitive–behavioural therapy. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of participants. SETTING: Interviews were conducted in a tertiary hospital in regional Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen participants who completed a PA coaching intervention were interviewed. The participants were recruited into the coaching intervention because they were insufficiently physically active at the time of recruitment. RESULTS: Thirteen (72%) participants were women and the average age of participants was 54 (±5) years. Four participant themes mapped directly onto five components of the COM-B model, and ten of the TDF domains. Increases in PA were influenced by changes in motivation and psychological capability. The autonomy-supportive PA coaching intervention helped to evoke participants’ own reasons (and motives) for change and influenced PA behaviours. Participants reflected on their own social and/or professional strengths, and used these skills to set appropriate PA goals and action plans. The structure of the PA coaching intervention provided clarity on session determinants and a framework from which to set an appropriate agenda. Relational components (eg, non-judgemental listening, collaboration) were continually highlighted as influential for change, and should be considered in future behaviour change intervention design. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the beneficial effect of using theory-informed behaviour change techniques, and delivering them in a style that promotes autonomy and relatedness. The views of participants should be a key consideration in the design and implementation of PA coaching interventions TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619000036112. Post-results analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9358940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93589402022-08-16 Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study Barrett, Stephen Begg, Stephen O'Halloran, Paul Breckon, Jeff Rodda, Kane Barrett, Gabrielle Kingsley, Michael BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: Behaviour change interventions targeting changes in physical activity (PA) can benefit by examining the underlying mechanisms that promote change. This study explored the use of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to code and contextualise the experiences of participants who completed a PA coaching intervention underpinned by motivational interviewing and cognitive–behavioural therapy. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of participants. SETTING: Interviews were conducted in a tertiary hospital in regional Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen participants who completed a PA coaching intervention were interviewed. The participants were recruited into the coaching intervention because they were insufficiently physically active at the time of recruitment. RESULTS: Thirteen (72%) participants were women and the average age of participants was 54 (±5) years. Four participant themes mapped directly onto five components of the COM-B model, and ten of the TDF domains. Increases in PA were influenced by changes in motivation and psychological capability. The autonomy-supportive PA coaching intervention helped to evoke participants’ own reasons (and motives) for change and influenced PA behaviours. Participants reflected on their own social and/or professional strengths, and used these skills to set appropriate PA goals and action plans. The structure of the PA coaching intervention provided clarity on session determinants and a framework from which to set an appropriate agenda. Relational components (eg, non-judgemental listening, collaboration) were continually highlighted as influential for change, and should be considered in future behaviour change intervention design. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the beneficial effect of using theory-informed behaviour change techniques, and delivering them in a style that promotes autonomy and relatedness. The views of participants should be a key consideration in the design and implementation of PA coaching interventions TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619000036112. Post-results analysis. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9358940/ /pubmed/35926990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057855 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Barrett, Stephen
Begg, Stephen
O'Halloran, Paul
Breckon, Jeff
Rodda, Kane
Barrett, Gabrielle
Kingsley, Michael
Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study
title Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study
title_full Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study
title_fullStr Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study
title_short Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study
title_sort factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9358940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057855
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettstephen factorsinfluencingadultswhoparticipateinaphysicalactivitycoachinginterventionatheoreticallyinformedqualitativestudy
AT beggstephen factorsinfluencingadultswhoparticipateinaphysicalactivitycoachinginterventionatheoreticallyinformedqualitativestudy
AT ohalloranpaul factorsinfluencingadultswhoparticipateinaphysicalactivitycoachinginterventionatheoreticallyinformedqualitativestudy
AT breckonjeff factorsinfluencingadultswhoparticipateinaphysicalactivitycoachinginterventionatheoreticallyinformedqualitativestudy
AT roddakane factorsinfluencingadultswhoparticipateinaphysicalactivitycoachinginterventionatheoreticallyinformedqualitativestudy
AT barrettgabrielle factorsinfluencingadultswhoparticipateinaphysicalactivitycoachinginterventionatheoreticallyinformedqualitativestudy
AT kingsleymichael factorsinfluencingadultswhoparticipateinaphysicalactivitycoachinginterventionatheoreticallyinformedqualitativestudy