Cargando…

Assessing the practicality of using a single knowledge‐based planning model for multiple linac vendors

PURPOSE: Knowledge‐based planning (KBP) has been shown to be an effective tool in quality control for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy treatment planning and generating high‐quality plans. Previous studies have evaluated its ability to create consistent plans across institutions and between pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Douglas, Raphael J., Olanrewaju, Adenike, Zhang, Lifei, Beadle, Beth M., Court, Laurence E.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:	Radiation Oncology Physics
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35791594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13704

Ejemplares similares

Knowledge‐based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
por: Cao, Wenhua, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Automation of radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer
por: Huang, Kai, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Fast generation of lung SBRT plans with a knowledge‐based planning model on ring‐mounted Halcyon Linac
por: Visak, Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Customizable landmark‐based field aperture design for automated whole‐brain radiotherapy treatment planning
por: Xiao, Yao, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning for Craniospinal Irradiation With a New O-ring Linac
por: Matsumoto, Kenji, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Hazard testing to reduce risk in the development of automated planning tools
por: Nealon, Kelly A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning
por: Zhang, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Measurement validation of treatment planning for a MR‐Linac
por: Chen, Xinfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Frequency of errors in the transfer of treatment parameters from the treatment planning system to the oncology information system in a multi‐vendor environment
por: Donahue, William P., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Initial dosimetric evaluation of SmartArc – a novel VMAT treatment planning module implemented in a multi‐vendor delivery chain
por: Feygelman, Vladimir, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Independent validation of machine performance check for the Halcyon and TrueBeam linacs for daily quality assurance
por: Li, Yuting, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Identifying the optimal deep learning architecture and parameters for automatic beam aperture definition in 3D radiotherapy
por: Gay, Skylar S., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Automated treatment planning of prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with focal boosting on a fast‐rotating O‐ring linac: Plan quality comparison with C‐arm linacs
por: De Roover, Robin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reproducibility of patient setup in the seated treatment position: A novel treatment chair design
por: McCarroll, Rachel E., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Interinstitutional beam model portability study in a mixed vendor environment
por: Frigo, Sean P., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Independent monitor unit verification for dynamic flattened beam plans on the Halcyon linac
por: Kubo, Kazuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rounded leaf end modeling in Pinnacle VMAT treatment planning for fixed jaw linacs
por: Young, Lori A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of Unity 1.5 T MR‐linac plan quality in patients with prostate cancer
por: Tanaka, Shohei, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Validation of the clinical applicability of knowledge‐based planning models in single‐isocenter volumetric‐modulated arc therapy for multiple brain metastases
por: Kishi, Noriko, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Automatic contouring QA method using a deep learning–based autocontouring system
por: Rhee, Dong Joo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy plan optimisation methods for a 1.5 T MR‐Linac
por: Chuter, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Prostate SBRT using O‐Ring Halcyon Linac — Plan quality, delivery efficiency, and accuracy
por: Pokhrel, Damodar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Automated field‐in‐field whole brain radiotherapy planning
por: Huang, Kai, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Analysis of esophageal‐sparing treatment plans for patients with high‐grade esophagitis
por: Niedzielski, Joshua S., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Statistical process control to monitor use of a web‐based autoplanning tool
por: Mehrens, Hunter, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Remote dosimetric auditing of clinical trials: The need for vendor specific models to convert images to dose
por: Miri, Narges, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of dosimetric impact of intra‐fractional setup discrepancy between multiple‐ and single‐isocenter approaches in linac‐based stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases
por: Tsui, Sylvia S. W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Dosimetric study of the plan quality and dose to organs at risk on tangential breast treatments using the Halcyon linac
por: Flores‐Martinez, Everardo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Experimental evaluation of the accuracy of skin dose calculation for a commercial treatment planning system
por: Court, Laurence E., et al.
Publicado: (2008)

The development of a 4D treatment planning methodology to simulate the tracking of central lung tumors in an MRI‐linac
por: Al‐Ward, Shahad M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Field‐in‐field breast planning for a jawless, double‐stack MLC LINAC using flattening‐filter‐free beams
por: Morris, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quality assessment of automatically planned O‐Ring linac SBRT plans for pelvic lymph node metastases, finding the optimal minimum target size by comparison with robotic SBRT
por: Hernández, Katerine Viviana Díaz, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

An interactive plan and model evolution method for knowledge‐based pelvic VMAT planning
por: Wang, Meijiao, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Optimizing efficiency and safety in external beam radiotherapy using automated plan check (APC) tool and six sigma methodology
por: Liu, Shi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of varying air cavity on planning dosimetry for rectum patients treated on a 1.5 T hybrid MR‐linac system
por: Godoy Scripes, Paola, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A measure of SRS/SRT plan quality: Quantitative limits for intermediate dose spill (R50%) in linac‐based delivery
por: Desai, Dharmin D., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The effect of integrating knowledge‐based planning with multicriteria optimization in treatment planning for prostate SBRT
por: Jayarathna, Sandun, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Portal dosimetry correction method for validation of single isocenter VMAT plans for multiple brain metastases
por: Lalonde, Ronald J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Dosimetric potential of knowledge‐based planning model trained with HyperArc plans for brain metastases
por: Sagawa, Tomohiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

On the use of single‐isocenter VMAT plans for SBRT treatment of synchronous multiple lung lesions: Plan quality, treatment efficiency, and early clinical outcomes
por: Pokhrel, Damodar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_u7drgt7puq4e54gd1n01mbt9pj