Cargando…

Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery. METHODS: Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacqmin, Dustin J., Miller, Jessica R., Barraclough, Brendan A., Labby, Zacariah E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13728
_version_ 1784764050354208768
author Jacqmin, Dustin J.
Miller, Jessica R.
Barraclough, Brendan A.
Labby, Zacariah E.
author_facet Jacqmin, Dustin J.
Miller, Jessica R.
Barraclough, Brendan A.
Labby, Zacariah E.
author_sort Jacqmin, Dustin J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery. METHODS: Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure good detector performance. These tests included energy dependence, short‐term repeatability, dose‐response linearity, angular dependence, temperature dependence, and dose rate dependence. Next, scan settings and calibration of the W2 were optimized to ensure high quality data acquisition. Profiles of small fields shaped by cones and multi‐leaf collimator (MLCs) were measured using the W2 and IBA RAZOR diode in a scanning water tank. Output factors for cones (4–17.5 mm) and MLC fields (1, 2, 3 cm) were acquired with both detectors. Finally, the dose at isocenter for seven radiosurgery plans was measured with the W2 detector. RESULTS: W2 exhibited acceptable warm‐up behavior, short‐term reproducibility, axial angular dependence, dose‐rate linearity, and dose linearity. The detector exhibits a dependence upon energy, polar angle, and temperature. Scanning measurements taken with the W2 and RAZOR were in good agreement, with full‐width half‐maximum and penumbra widths agreeing to within 0.1 mm. The output factors measured by the W2 and RAZOR exhibited a maximum difference of 1.8%. For the seven point‐dose measurements of radiosurgery plans, the W2 agreed well with our treatment planning system with a maximum deviation of 2.2%. The Čerenkov light ratio calibration method did not significantly impact the measurement of relative profiles, output factors, or point dose measurements. CONCLUSION: The W2 demonstrated dosimetric characteristics that are suitable for radiosurgery field measurements. The detector agreed well with the RAZOR diode for output factors and scanned profiles and showed good agreement with the treatment planning system in measurements of clinical treatment plans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9359019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-93590192022-08-10 Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields Jacqmin, Dustin J. Miller, Jessica R. Barraclough, Brendan A. Labby, Zacariah E. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery. METHODS: Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure good detector performance. These tests included energy dependence, short‐term repeatability, dose‐response linearity, angular dependence, temperature dependence, and dose rate dependence. Next, scan settings and calibration of the W2 were optimized to ensure high quality data acquisition. Profiles of small fields shaped by cones and multi‐leaf collimator (MLCs) were measured using the W2 and IBA RAZOR diode in a scanning water tank. Output factors for cones (4–17.5 mm) and MLC fields (1, 2, 3 cm) were acquired with both detectors. Finally, the dose at isocenter for seven radiosurgery plans was measured with the W2 detector. RESULTS: W2 exhibited acceptable warm‐up behavior, short‐term reproducibility, axial angular dependence, dose‐rate linearity, and dose linearity. The detector exhibits a dependence upon energy, polar angle, and temperature. Scanning measurements taken with the W2 and RAZOR were in good agreement, with full‐width half‐maximum and penumbra widths agreeing to within 0.1 mm. The output factors measured by the W2 and RAZOR exhibited a maximum difference of 1.8%. For the seven point‐dose measurements of radiosurgery plans, the W2 agreed well with our treatment planning system with a maximum deviation of 2.2%. The Čerenkov light ratio calibration method did not significantly impact the measurement of relative profiles, output factors, or point dose measurements. CONCLUSION: The W2 demonstrated dosimetric characteristics that are suitable for radiosurgery field measurements. The detector agreed well with the RAZOR diode for output factors and scanned profiles and showed good agreement with the treatment planning system in measurements of clinical treatment plans. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9359019/ /pubmed/35861648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13728 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Jacqmin, Dustin J.
Miller, Jessica R.
Barraclough, Brendan A.
Labby, Zacariah E.
Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields
title Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields
title_full Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields
title_fullStr Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields
title_full_unstemmed Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields
title_short Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields
title_sort commissioning an exradin w2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13728
work_keys_str_mv AT jacqmindustinj commissioninganexradinw2plasticscintillationdetectorforclinicaluseinsmallradiationfields
AT millerjessicar commissioninganexradinw2plasticscintillationdetectorforclinicaluseinsmallradiationfields
AT barracloughbrendana commissioninganexradinw2plasticscintillationdetectorforclinicaluseinsmallradiationfields
AT labbyzacariahe commissioninganexradinw2plasticscintillationdetectorforclinicaluseinsmallradiationfields