Cargando…
Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6
BACKGROUND: RaySearch (AB, Stockholm) has released a module for CyberKnife (CK) planning within its RayStation (RS) treatment planning system (TPS). PURPOSE: To create and validate beam models of fixed, Iris, and multileaf collimators (MLC) of the CK M6 for Monte Carlo (MC) and collapsed cone (CC) a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35856911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13732 |
_version_ | 1784764053099380736 |
---|---|
author | Gondré, Maude Conrad, Mireille Vallet, Véronique Bourhis, Jean Bochud, François Moeckli, Raphaël |
author_facet | Gondré, Maude Conrad, Mireille Vallet, Véronique Bourhis, Jean Bochud, François Moeckli, Raphaël |
author_sort | Gondré, Maude |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: RaySearch (AB, Stockholm) has released a module for CyberKnife (CK) planning within its RayStation (RS) treatment planning system (TPS). PURPOSE: To create and validate beam models of fixed, Iris, and multileaf collimators (MLC) of the CK M6 for Monte Carlo (MC) and collapsed cone (CC) algorithms in the RS TPS. METHODS: Measurements needed for the creation of the beam models were performed in a water tank with a stereotactic PTW 60018 diode. Both CC and MC models were optimized in RS by minimizing the differences between the measured and computed profiles and percentage depth doses. The models were then validated by comparing dose from the plans created in RS with both single and multiple beams in different phantom conditions with the corresponding measured dose. Irregular field shapes and off‐axis beams were also tested for the MLC. Validation measurements were performed using an A1SL ionization chamber, EBT3 Gafchromic films, and a PTW 1000 SRS detector. Finally, patient‐specific QAs with gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm were performed for each model. RESULTS: The models were created in a straightforward manner with efficient tools available in RS. The differences between computed and measured doses were within ±1% for most of the configurations tested and reached a maximum of 3.2% for measurements at a depth of 19.5‐cm. With respect to all collimators and algorithms, the maximum averaged dose difference was 0.8% when considering absolute dose measurements on the central axis. The patient‐specific QAs led to a mean result of 98% of points fulfilling gamma criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We created both CC and MC models for fixed, Iris, and MLC collimators in RS. The dose differences for all collimators and algorithms were within ±1%, except for depths larger than 9 cm. This allowed us to validate both models for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9359029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-93590292022-08-10 Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6 Gondré, Maude Conrad, Mireille Vallet, Véronique Bourhis, Jean Bochud, François Moeckli, Raphaël J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics BACKGROUND: RaySearch (AB, Stockholm) has released a module for CyberKnife (CK) planning within its RayStation (RS) treatment planning system (TPS). PURPOSE: To create and validate beam models of fixed, Iris, and multileaf collimators (MLC) of the CK M6 for Monte Carlo (MC) and collapsed cone (CC) algorithms in the RS TPS. METHODS: Measurements needed for the creation of the beam models were performed in a water tank with a stereotactic PTW 60018 diode. Both CC and MC models were optimized in RS by minimizing the differences between the measured and computed profiles and percentage depth doses. The models were then validated by comparing dose from the plans created in RS with both single and multiple beams in different phantom conditions with the corresponding measured dose. Irregular field shapes and off‐axis beams were also tested for the MLC. Validation measurements were performed using an A1SL ionization chamber, EBT3 Gafchromic films, and a PTW 1000 SRS detector. Finally, patient‐specific QAs with gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm were performed for each model. RESULTS: The models were created in a straightforward manner with efficient tools available in RS. The differences between computed and measured doses were within ±1% for most of the configurations tested and reached a maximum of 3.2% for measurements at a depth of 19.5‐cm. With respect to all collimators and algorithms, the maximum averaged dose difference was 0.8% when considering absolute dose measurements on the central axis. The patient‐specific QAs led to a mean result of 98% of points fulfilling gamma criteria. CONCLUSIONS: We created both CC and MC models for fixed, Iris, and MLC collimators in RS. The dose differences for all collimators and algorithms were within ±1%, except for depths larger than 9 cm. This allowed us to validate both models for clinical use. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9359029/ /pubmed/35856911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13732 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Gondré, Maude Conrad, Mireille Vallet, Véronique Bourhis, Jean Bochud, François Moeckli, Raphaël Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6 |
title | Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6 |
title_full | Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6 |
title_fullStr | Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6 |
title_full_unstemmed | Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6 |
title_short | Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6 |
title_sort | commissioning and validation of raystation treatment planning system for cyberknife m6 |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9359029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35856911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gondremaude commissioningandvalidationofraystationtreatmentplanningsystemforcyberknifem6 AT conradmireille commissioningandvalidationofraystationtreatmentplanningsystemforcyberknifem6 AT valletveronique commissioningandvalidationofraystationtreatmentplanningsystemforcyberknifem6 AT bourhisjean commissioningandvalidationofraystationtreatmentplanningsystemforcyberknifem6 AT bochudfrancois commissioningandvalidationofraystationtreatmentplanningsystemforcyberknifem6 AT moeckliraphael commissioningandvalidationofraystationtreatmentplanningsystemforcyberknifem6 |